Dear Editor: Gov’t must clamp down on police refusal to use bodycams, especially in current climate

“[…] When police officers disobey direct orders from superiors to wear body cameras, it is a serious breach of protocol and accountability.

“[…] Police hierarchy should disclose when and why officers fail to wear body cams, especially during use-of-force incidents…”

The following Letter to the Editor on the importance of body cameras by law enforcement officers, particularly in the ‘stand your ground’ era, was submitted to Wired868 by Orson Rogers of Belmont:

A police officer with bodycamera.
(via Axion.)

When police officers disobey direct orders from superiors to wear body cameras, it is a serious breach of protocol and accountability.

I believe that appropriate actions should be taken to address the misconduct.

This may include internal disciplinary measures such as a written warning or reprimand for first-time or minor offences, suspension or loss of pay for repeated or willful noncompliance, and termination for persistent refusal, especially if linked to incidents of misconduct or excessive force.

Photo: A TTPS exercise in inner-Port of Spain.
(via Newsday.co.tt)

Now that we have a new “stand your ground” government in place and a new minister of security, is it too much to expect a clear enforcement policy where departments must have clearly written policies on body cam usage?

This would include outlined consequences for violations, and officers should sign acknowledgements of these policies during training and periodically thereafter.

The issue of public transparency is paramount, and police hierarchy should disclose when and why officers fail to wear body cams, especially during use-of-force incidents.

Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar (right) and Attorney General John Jeremie.
Photo: Office of the President.

And civilian review boards or oversight commissions should be empowered to investigate noncompliance. Transparency in the process boosts public trust.

Ultimately, noncompliance should never be tolerated, as it undermines transparency, accountability, and public trust—three pillars of ethical policing.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Why current criminals make me miss the ‘fowl tief’

“[…] The old Caribbean fowl thief occupied a strange cultural category. He (mainly men were the culprits) was a criminal, Read more

Dear Editor: $3,000 vs $87,847—pension gap between citizens and parliamentarians is outrageous

I write on behalf of the thousands of working men and women of Trinidad and Tobago who spent their entire Read more

Dear Editor: In wake of maxi strike, can we forget politics and talk rapid rail again?

Monday morning, 5:45am, Curepe junction. Three maxis pass me—full. Fourth stops. Driver leans out: “Only Sa Wa.” I begged to Read more

Warner: “Inequality in T&T is no longer subtle—we’re entering dangerous territory”

“[…] Trinidadians and Tobagonians are resilient people. But what citizens rarely tolerate for long is inconsistency. Once people begin believing Read more

Demming: SLAPP-ing away our rights; T&T must address lawsuits meant to silence citizens

Silence is not peace. It is the beginning of social decline. Too many of us are witnessing lawsuits used not Read more

Dear Editor: HDC contract scandal proves Gov’t must routinely release procurement data

“[…] As we navigate 2026, we find ourselves facing a rather curious paradox: the very mechanism designed to illuminate public Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: Why Children’s Authority MUST intervene, with 13-year-old singing about alcohol and taking backshots

A 13-year-old girl singing Tight and Pretty with sexually explicit lyrics is a child protection …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.