Union: How is Royal Castle providing food without workers? Fast-food chain gets 24 hours to explain


“[…] If in fact [Royal Castle] has proceeded with procuring alternative means to provide its food to the public while bypassing its workers and their union, these would constitute serious breaches of the collective agreement and violations of the law. 

“These could include illegally outsourcing or subcontracting labour, failing to recognise and treat with the union, and even illegal retrenchment.

“Royal Castle workers earn barely above the minimum wage, and are already some of the country’s most disadvantaged and vulnerable workers…”

Photo: The Royal Castle logo.
(via Royal Castle)

The following statement on Royal Castle’s ‘Grab and Go’ meals was issued to Wired868 by the Amalgamated Workers Union:


Royal Castle, the nation’s first locally-owned fast-food chain, has been temporarily closed since 16 May, in accordance with national coronavirus public health regulations and the state of emergency. All daily-rated staff workers who prepare, cook and assemble meals, and operate cash registers, have been sent home without pay since then.

However, according to recent published reports in print and social media, Royal Castle is providing food for sale to the public via other means—including a ‘Grab and Go’ prepackaged option announced on the C3 Centre’s Facebook page in April, and at the Fresh Street supermarket in D’abadie. 

Such food is clearly being provided without the input of its regular workforce, and these measures were never discussed with nor consented to by the Amalgamated Workers Union, which represents Royal Castle’s daily-paid workers nationwide.

Following the extension of public health restrictions announced on 22 May, the union wrote Royal Castle on 26 May to engage the company on how it would treat with the very same workers who have contributed to the survival of the chain during the entire, unprecedented pandemic period. 

Photo: Royal Castle conduct business in July 2020.
(via Royal Castle)

The union also specifically sought clarification on the means by which the company is providing Grab and Go meals to the public without the input of its union workforce or without any prior consultation with the workers’ official representatives.

The company’s reply was: ‘A response will be forwarded to you in due course.’

That is not acceptable—either under a pandemic, a state of emergency, or at any time.

While the union acknowledges the importance to the public of comfort food options under pandemic conditions, we cannot forget the important national interest served by keeping workers at work where possible. Like any other employer in Trinidad and Tobago, Royal Castle Limited falls under the jurisdiction of the law—including the Industrial Relations Act, our Constitution, and prior decisions of the Industrial Court—as well as international fair labour standards. 

Further, the company is a unionised workplace, with clear duties imposed upon both company and union to respect and abide by the registered collective agreement between the parties, and to consult and negotiate in good faith on matters affecting the terms and conditions of employment of its workers in our bargaining unit.

If in fact the company has proceeded with procuring alternative means to provide its food to the public while bypassing its workers and their union, these would constitute serious breaches of the collective agreement and violations of the law. These could include illegally outsourcing or subcontracting labour, failing to recognise and treat with the union, and even illegal retrenchment.

Photo: The Royal Castle franchise is one of the country’s most popular fast food restaurants.
(via Royal Castle)

Royal Castle workers earn barely above the minimum wage, and are already some of the country’s most disadvantaged and vulnerable workers. The AWU is therefore calling on Royal Castle to publicly clarify, within the next 24 hours, how it is providing the public with food under the Royal Castle label while its workers are forced to suffer a pandemic at home, without pay. 

If the union does not receive a timely response, we will have no choice but to seek the Industrial Court’s immediate intervention in the protection of our members’, and the nation’s, interests.

The union further calls on all employers and workers to unite, in these difficult times—in a spirt of disciplined cooperation in following the government’s public health and emergency guidelines—to ensure that we can all return to safety and normalcy without sacrificing our most precious and hard-fought rights of fairness, justice and equity in the workplace.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Why was Thomas-Felix moved? Industrial Court owes T&T transparency

From the onset I wish to indicate that I hold no brief for either the outgoing office holder or the Read more

Dear Editor: 1% ordering what they can’t eat by weakening Industrial Court

“[…] What do the employers and the one percent want? The objective is to maximise their profits by minimising their Read more

Dear editor: Gobar! How will raising minimum wage cause inflation, when it’s already here?!

“The Minister of Tourism, Randall Mitchell, has said that increasing the minimum wage will cause inflation... This is a ton Read more

Noble: How the neo-liberal myth of ‘Me, Myself and I’ poisoned T&T society

Our teachers’ day of ‘rest and reflection’ is entirely unsurprising. It is the natural outcome of events that began in Read more

Kangalee: Why Private Security Industry Bill will cement exploitation of workers—and why you should care

“[…] One year later, the 1995 minimum wage order removed the provisions for sick leave, vacation leave and the provision Read more

Kangalee: Claim that workers can sacrifice wage increases for job security is a ‘Nansi story’!

“[…] During the Petrotrin shutdown saga, the OWTU actually offered to take a 15% wage cut in order to save Read more

About Letters to the Editor

Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com. Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation. We don't publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.

Check Also

Dear Editor: Why was Thomas-Felix moved? Industrial Court owes T&T transparency

From the onset I wish to indicate that I hold no brief for either the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.