Crowne: AG Al-Rawi curiously wrong in characterising ‘doxing Devant’

“Doxing, according to the AG, ‘is when you go out of your way to crash a system using certain truths’ which is ‘akin to a cybercrime’. With the greatest of respect, this is untrue. This is not what doxing is.

“[…] In fact both the Interim Report and Report of the Joint Select Committee on the Cybercrime Bill 2017—which the AG himself chaired—defined doxing as ‘the practice of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent’. Therefore it is even more surprising that the AG would define the term in such an odd manner.”

The following Letter to the Editor on Attorney General Faris Al-Rawi’s description of doxing—in reference to the behaviour of former UNC Senator Devant Maharaj—was submitted to Wired868 by barrister and attorney-at-law, Dr Emir Crowne:

Photo: Former UNC Senator Devant Maharaj.
(Copyright I95.5fm)

Devant Maharaj has come into the spotlight recently for releasing the otherwise private phone numbers of public officials. Once those numbers have been published, various public officials have reported being inundated with messages, death threats and salacious imagery.

Over the weekend the Honourable Attorney General indicated that Mr Maharaj was ‘doxing’. Doxing, according to the AG, “is when you go out of your way to crash a system using certain truths” which is “akin to a cybercrime.”

With the greatest of respect, this is untrue. This is not what doxing is.

Doxing is the use of the Internet to find and/or publish information about an individual. The information could be public, public but difficult to find, or private. Doxing can be malicious, or for benevolent purposes like social activism and news reporting.

In fact both the Interim Report and Report of the Joint Select Committee on the Cybercrime Bill 2017—which the AG himself chaired—defined doxing as “the practice of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.” Therefore it is even more surprising that the AG would define the term in such an odd manner.

The AG’s suggestion that doxing is “akin to a cybercrime.” That statement is also curious since both the Interim Report and the Report of the Joint Select Committee on the Cybercrime Bill 2017 were inconclusive on this point.

Photo: Attorney general Faris Al-Rawi.

Both reports simply noted stakeholder concern as to whether section 18 (1) of the Cybercrime Bill encompassed doxing would criminalise a “person who uses a computer system to communicate with the intention to cause harm to another person.”

To suggest that doxing is “akin to a cybercrime” despite such legislative ambiguity might be a worrying glimpse into the purported reach of the Government’s proposed cybercrime legislation.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Demonising Independent senators is a dangerous attack on T&T’s democracy

I am not a politician. I’m certainly not a senator. I am just a citizen who pays attention. So, when Read more

A Tribute to The Mighty Sparrow: The Birdie sings no more!

Today, Trinidad and Tobago, and indeed the Caribbean, bids farewell to a true cultural giant. With the passing of Dr Read more

Dear Editor: How long will T&T allow TTPS to insult our intelligence over non-use of bodycams?

“[…] It is nothing short of amazing how this current political directorate can go from conceptualization of 30 ‘police post’ Read more

Dear Editor: Neglect under PNM, betrayal under UNC—workers still on 2010 and 2013 salaries

Thirteen years have passed since health care workers, Lake Asphalt employees and other workers last received a salary adjustment. In Read more

Devant Maharaj: ‘The last non-UNC ballot was counted; now the PM’s mask is off…’

“[…] To the ‘UNC family’ she offers the old tired hymn: lagoons, cane fields, salt and rice, ponds and springs—the Read more

Dr Farrell: The Crisis at the CCJ—what is to be done?

“[…] The media release by the heads of judiciaries—that seemed to focus on the leak of the emails and breach Read more

Check Also

St Rose: Safeguarding process cannot be determined by complainant; TTFA responds to concerns

“[…] The safeguarding process belongs to the protection of the child and the proper management …

2 comments

  1. “To suggest that doxing is “akin to a cybercrime” despite such legislative ambiguity might be a worrying glimpse into the purported reach of the Government’s proposed cybercrime legislation.”

    …and, no less tellingly, into the workings of the mind of any person responsible for such a suggestion.

  2. Seems right on par with the sedition reference with respect to the same phone numbers leak. Even Senator Palpatine would blush at these developments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.