“[…] Curiously, the United National Congress was similarly quiet in the days following the PNM political meeting that was held in Arima on 24 May.
“[…] One would be safe to assume that were there an attack of any kind that night on the Member for Siparia, it would have been met with an immediate and full-throated rebuttal.
“[…] It was only after the news broke of Mrs Persad-Bissessar’s deprecating ‘slave master name’ comments from that night, that the gears of the UNC machinery ground into action…”
The following Letter to the Editor on Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s reference to MP Camille Robinson-Regis’ ‘slave master’ name was submitted to Wired868 by George Elias of Cascade:
Addressing someone by their full name has become a common practice in polite society. As far as I am aware, it is done both for the sake of clarity as well as for emphasis. In my own personal experience, I have never once seen or heard of it being done as part of an effort to debase or embarrass another person.
Ironically, a good example of this ‘practice’ can be seen in the opposition benches of Parliament where, for the longest time now, they have taken to referring to the Honourable Prime Minister by his full name: Keith Christopher Rowley. Personally, I have found that practice to be less odious than the Opposition’s collective habit of omitting the ‘Dr’ from the Prime Minister’s name when they refer to him.
In the years during which the Opposition has maintained that ‘low’ standard, I have never once observed a member of the ruling party rushing to the defence of the Prime Minister.
Curiously, the United National Congress was similarly quiet in the days following the PNM political meeting that was held in Arima on 24 May.
As one would recall, it was at that time that the Member of Parliament for Arouca/Maloney, the Honourable Camille Robinson-Regis, ‘called out’ the former prime minister for her party’s apparent lack of action on the now notorious ‘Sabga Report’ of 1997.
In the nine days that immediately followed, both the United National Congress and the Sanatan Dharma Maha Saba (SDMS) had much to say publicly about the content of Mrs Robinson-Regis’ contribution from that night. It should be noted, however, that none of their responses focused on her repeated use of Mrs Persad-Bissessar’s full name, let alone mentioned it in passing. Not one single hue or cry was offered up.
One would be safe to assume that were there an attack of any kind that night on the Member for Siparia, it would have been met with an immediate and full-throated rebuttal. Or at the very least, a chorus of exaggerated offence—much like the one we have witnessed since she alighted from the podium last Thursday night (nine days later), having caused great pain to half the national population.
In fact, it was only after the news broke of Mrs Persad-Bissessar’s deprecating ‘slave master name’ comments from that night that the gears of the UNC machinery ground into action.
And one need not be too politically savvy to recognise ‘spin’ when spin is so glaringly brought to bear on a situation of such patent and reckless incompetence.
There is no justification or explanation that can ease the blow of what has been said. The descendants of slaves have every right to be celebrated and elevated for their past, not made to feel debased by it. They should instead be taught to take pride in the fact that they are the survivors of one of the most disgraceful, repressive and inhuman chapters of our shared history.
Slavery should never be used as a tool to chasten or debase. What Mrs Persad-Bissessar said on 2 June, whether intentional or not, only serves to do just that. It is as inexcusable as it is abhorrent. And it ought to be rejected by all the citizens of this Republic—regardless of race, religion or political affiliation.
In addressing this newest scandal, this ‘MiddleName-Gate’, there is simply no middle ground; you are either on the right or wrong side of this moment in history.
I therefore call on the Opposition Leader and her apologists to ‘get down from there’ and to apologise, without reservation. Now!
Does Kamla have a problem with “blank” people?
Man, it sure looks like Kamla has an issue with “blank” people.
Yes!! especially when they cannot be used as props in an attempt to fool those gullible enough to think otherwise. Imagine you so proud of your ‘heritage and ancestry’ and someone simply repeating your name could irritate you to the point of getting so distasteful. Her response wasn’t just racist but nasty to the point of speaking about the purchase of fertility drugs on a gov’t issued credit card etc. The same leader who have her supporters march up and down the country over the last couple months protesting about the treatment of women in this country. This is from a woman who in her tenure as PM indulged in all manner of recklessness and indiscretions that this country is still reeling from seven years later. Are we for real??
Such a pity that no one will send a pro-UNC letter to the Editor of wired868.com!
Or is it that the editorial policy is to be aligned with the PNM?
The editorial policy certainly favours impartiality, prioritising presentation of ALL sides above presentation of any one side.
No surprise, then, that “no one will send a pro-UNC letter to the Editor of wired868.com.” In the face of such a clear policy, what would be the point?
Funny enough, we published a letter from UNC Senator Anil Roberts just last week that was very well circulated. Is it that you are writing letters that are not being published? Maybe you should read Anil’s letter, read over this one and then read what you sent and look for the difference between your submissions and theirs.