Dear Editor: It’s illegal, under OSHA, to force employees to pay for PCR tests

“Many employers are trying to force workers who have not been vaccinated to take a PCR test… Of course, the expectation is that workers will pay for this—and at anything up to $1,400 a test, it is hardly worth going to work. 

“You’re not going to work to pay the rent, but to pay the lab!”

The following Letter to the Editor on the legality of employers insisting that employees pay for their own PCR tests before reporting to work was submitted to Wired868 by Dave Smith of the National Workers Union (NWU):

Many employers are trying to force workers who have not been vaccinated to take a PCR test. Some employers want every month, but others are demanding every two weeks.

Of course, the expectation is that workers will pay for this—and at anything up to $1,400 a test, it is hardly worth going to work. You’re not going to work to pay the rent, but to pay the lab!

The argument that many employers are putting up is that this is for the safety of the work environment.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, employers DO have a legal responsibility to provide a safe working environment. To quote the Act:

‘It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the safety, health and welfare at work of all his employees.’

Okay so far. But one of the problems with a selective reading of the law is that you are tempted to conveniently miss things that are not in your favour.

Have a look at section 12 of the OSH Act:

‘12. (1) No employer shall levy or permit to be levied on any employee of his in respect of anything done or provided in pursuance of any specific requirement of this Act, except in respect of—

(a) foodstuffs and other items served in a canteen;

(b) things lost or damaged wilfully or through the negligence of the employee; and

(c) protective clothing and devices where the employee is employed for one month or less.

(2) Amount levied under subsection (1)(c) shall not be in excess of one-half of the value of the protective clothing or device.’

Section 37 of the Act is even more explicit. It states:

‘(1) Where, after the commencement of this Act, a person seeks employment, or is already employed, in an industrial establishment, he may be required by the employer to undergo a medical examination as a pre-condition of permanent employment, or to determine fitness for work, except in such shops or places of work as the Minister may, by Order, exempt.

(2) The cost of the medical examination shall be borne by the employer.’

So, if PCR tests are required by the employer to fulfill the obligations under OSH legislation, then it seems they and not the worker must pay for it.

Editor’s Note: Click HERE to read an appeal by PNM National Women’s League chair Camille Robinson-Regis to the women of Trinidad and Tobago to vaccinate their households.

More from Wired868

Dear Editor: The sell-out of Rocky Point; the problem with Aboud’s Tobago deal

“[…] (John Aboud’s Superior Hotels) consistently refused to adjust the project’s scale, design, or mitigation strategies, demonstrating a profound lack Read more

Dear Editor: T&T must take waste management seriously; it’s a public health and environmental hazard

A recent comment from a visiting sailor has stayed with me in a way that is both embarrassing and deeply Read more

Dr Harris: Valuing workers is only way to avoid brain drain and retain T&T’s best assets

“[…] In his 1971 book The Mechanics of Independence, ANR Robinson wrote that: ‘As financial rewards are lower in the Read more

When moral authority meets historical reality: the problem with Ramdeen’s religious defence

“[…] Consider slavery. The transatlantic slave trade was not opposed by scripture—it was justified by it. Genesis 9:25–27 legitimised enslavement Read more

Roses without thorns—the hollow trumpet of selective morality should be T&T’s real concern

There is a troubling pattern in our public life: moral leaders who sound their trumpets loudly, yet hollowly choosing the Read more

Dr Lutchman: “What they call will is but an echo in an empty hall”—addressing addiction

“[…] The midbrain doesn’t know the difference between a hit of cocaine and the ‘win’ of a social spotlight or Read more

Letters to the Editor

Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com.
Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation.
We don’t publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.