Devant Maharaj: Dictators are not victims—why I support Gov’t stance on Cuba embargo

“[…] Trinidad and Tobago’s vote on 28 October 2026 against the UN resolution on the Cuba embargo was not a betrayal of principle. It was the first time in more than 30 years that this country refused to lend its name to a resolution that treats a military dictatorship as the injured party…”

The following Letter to the Editor, which addresses the Kamla Persad-Bissessar-led Government’s support of a US embargo on Cuba, was submitted to Wired868 by former UNC minister Dr Devant Maharaj:

Photo: A group of 216 Cuban health workers participate in an event at Jose Marti International Airport in Havana, Cuba before leaving for South Africa on 25 April 2020, to help in that country’s fight against Covid-19.
Trinidad and Tobago is among multiple Caribbean countries that benefitted directly from Cuban medical expertise.
(Copyright EPA-EFE/ Ernesto Mastrascusa.)

I have not supported the Kamla Persad-Bissessar government on many things. However, on the position of Cuba, I fully support.

Trinidad and Tobago’s vote on 28 October 2026 against the UN resolution on the Cuba embargo was not a betrayal of principle. It was the first time in more than 30 years that this country refused to lend its name to a resolution that treats a military dictatorship as the injured party.

The Government has said it supports the Cuban people and rejects the system that rules them. That is the only position consistent with freedom.

The official opposition has condemned the vote. Former Prime Minister Keith Rowley called it “shameful” and accused the Government of selling the country’s dignity to curry favour.

US president Donald Trump (centre, seated) had an enthusiastic ally in Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar (second from right) at the Shield of the Americas Summit in Doral, Florida in March 2026.
Photo: UNC.

Former Foreign and Caricom Affairs Minister Dr Amery Browne went further, branding it “disgraceful”, claiming it contradicts the UN Charter and international law, does not represent the views of the people of Trinidad and Tobago, and aligns the country with the “starvation of millions”.

He also said the vote confirms Trinidad and Tobago as a “vassal fringe state” that has farmed out its foreign policy. These are strong words. They are also familiar. They treat the Cuban regime as a victim of external pressure rather than the author of its own people’s hardship.

They ignore that Cubans cannot freely leave, that independent journalism is punished, and that the economy collapses under one-party rule even when oil or remittances arrive. None of those who now defend Havana has offered to trade their passport for a Cuban one. The silence is the argument.

A woman peers out of a modest house in Cuba.

The same regional leaders who now issue statements about Cuba once watched other Caribbean dictatorships and limited themselves to talk. Maurice Bishop’s Grenada ran a one-party state until a US force removed it.

Forbes Burnham’s Guyana under cooperative socialism produced repression and economic failure while neighbor’s offered little concern. Joaquín Balaguer’s long rule in the Dominican Republic was marked by violence and control, yet Caricom statements rarely moved beyond ritual. Haiti’s suffering continues in full view.

Regional governments speak from the safety of their own democracies and then return to business as usual. Authoritarianism is condemned only when it is convenient and distant.

Photo: Late Trinidad and Tobago prime minister Basdeo Panday (right) shares a joke with then Cuba president Fidel Castro during the closing ceremony of a CARIFORUM meeting in 1998.
(Copyright AFP 2014/ Roberto Schmidt.)

Communism and military rule have failed wherever they have been tried. They produce fear, exit, and economic collapse. The Cuban people live under one-party rule that the regime itself has sustained for more than six decades. The embargo is secondary to that system.

Voting against a resolution that ignores this fact is not hostility to Cubans. It is refusal to pretend that their hardship is caused only by external pressure.

The Government’s position is clear: support the people, reject the dictatorship. Critics who defend Havana while refusing to live under it have already answered their own argument.

More from Wired868
St Louis: How do we support Cubans through invoking decades of hardships on their citizens?

I support democracy, human rights, political freedom and the right of the Cuban people to determine their own future. Those Read more

He played his role with authenticity, courage, dignity and conviction—tribute to Brother Valentino, The People’s Calypsonian

Once again, the calypso fraternity and the nation of Trinidad and Tobago have been plunged into mourning with the passing Read more

Dear Editor: Demonising Independent senators is a dangerous attack on T&T’s democracy

I am not a politician. I’m certainly not a senator. I am just a citizen who pays attention. So, when Read more

A Tribute to The Mighty Sparrow: The Birdie sings no more!

Today, Trinidad and Tobago, and indeed the Caribbean, bids farewell to a true cultural giant. With the passing of Dr Read more

Dear Editor: How long will T&T allow TTPS to insult our intelligence over non-use of bodycams?

“[…] It is nothing short of amazing how this current political directorate can go from conceptualization of 30 ‘police post’ Read more

Dear Editor: Neglect under PNM, betrayal under UNC—workers still on 2010 and 2013 salaries

Thirteen years have passed since health care workers, Lake Asphalt employees and other workers last received a salary adjustment. In Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: TTFA exec must prove constitutional amendments strengthen T&T football; not just its hold on power

“[…] The obvious question is: What has changed since 2024 to make another significant constitutional …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.