PM’s coat of arms announcement needed consultation and political neutrality

“[…] While I have no issues with our national emblems being reconsidered and redesigned, because that kind of thinking is long overdue, my quibble lies with how the decision was announced and arrived at—though not in that order.

“[…] It also raises questions of oversight since it is usually the Office of the President that has responsibility for national emblems and symbols…”

The following Letter to the Editor on Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley’s proposed change to the Trinidad and Tobago Coat of Arms was submitted to Wired868 by Newsauce:

Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley (right) at the Energy and Conference Trade Show on 22 January 2024.
Photo: OPM

I wholeheartedly support the inclusion of the steelpan on our coat of arms and the removal of Columbus’ three ships from his first voyage.

The 1961 Committee that oversaw the creation of our national emblems did as best a job as they could have done for their era and now, as an evolving society, we have entered a new era of awareness.

While I have no issues with our national emblems being reconsidered and redesigned, because that kind of thinking is long overdue, my quibble lies with how the decision was announced and arrived at—though not in that order.

Pannist Adrianna Achaiba performs at the funeral of Basdeo Panday at SAPA.
Photo: Office of the Parliament 2024

Because the announcement came as a surprise to the population, it suggests that the decision was made by a small group of persons.

In addition, the announcement was made in a political party forum and not a nationally neutral space like the Parliament. It leaves the Prime Minister and Government open to accusations of high-handed authoritarian behaviour.

It also raises questions of oversight since it is usually the Office of the President that has responsibility for national emblems and symbols.

Given that citizens have an opportunity to weigh in on statues and street names in an upcoming consultation, I think the decision to change the coat of arms could have been addressed via that channel.

Should Trinidad and Tobago replace Christopher Columbus’ three ships with the steelpan on the country’s coat of arms?

The consultation space would have also allowed the Government to outline all of the very solid reasons it has for incorporating an instrument so symbolic of our economy and creativity and possibly diffused some of the charged (but expected) ethnocentric rhetoric on the issue.

Only the usual suspects would object to pan replacing vessels symbolic of colonization.

I also think one more indigenous/ First Peoples’ symbol should be on it, since it is their land we all now occupy.

Photo: Late Carib Queen Jennifer Cassar poses in front of a statue of Chief Hyarima in Arima.
(Courtesy Julie Guyadeen)

Daiz my 2 cents. And may God bless our nation.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: All at SEA—changes needed in T&T’s education system

“[…] T&T’s education system thus faces two challenges—decades old, but now more pressing in the context of 21st century market Read more

Dear Editor: Know the ground you’re standing on—talking points on proposed home invasion bill

“[…] While the proponents of this proposed bill argue that these laws will promote self-defense and personal responsibility, critics have Read more

St Louis: Union leaders inside UNC-led gov’t must speak up—workers are watching

Elements of the trade union movement now sits inside the coalition that governs Trinidad and Tobago. That should have brought Read more

Dear Editor: None but ourselves can free our minds…

“[…] The psychological impact of long-term oppression can be devastating, leading to a cycle of poverty, social alienation, and continued Read more

Dear Editor: Gov’t must be wary of religious extremists to avoid repeat of 1990

“[…] The 1990 coup demonstrated that unchecked religious freedom and extreme religious ideologies can pose a direct threat to democracy Read more

Kamla: “The rule of law remains our strongest shield”—lessons from July 27

“[…] Let us be clear: the perpetrators of July 1990 were not patriots. The true patriots defended the Constitution and Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: All at SEA—changes needed in T&T’s education system

“[…] T&T’s education system thus faces two challenges—decades old, but now more pressing in the …

2 comments

  1. If government insists on including Pan on the coat of arms, I suggest they replace the whole crest with a pan, on its pan stand and with its two sticks. The crest is rather meaningless. The palm tree is not indigenous to TT, the mantle and wreath symbolize nothing. Only the helmet and ship’s wheel have some meaning. The helmet represents British rule and the wheel represents Columbus discovery.

    I therefore suggest replacing the three ships on the shield with the helmet and ship’s wheel. This way the pan will have pride of place, symbolizing the present while the helmet and wheel below represent important moments of our history.

  2. Whether the change is a good or bad one, like everything else in this country, is subject to opinion. The prime issue in this is how the decision to effect this change was arrived at. The NATIONAL Coat of Arms is a NATIONAL symbol. No ONE PERSON, and certainly one who is not the HEAD OF STATE, should be able to issue a proclamation from on high changing it without Parliamentary or even nominal public consultation. Trinidad and Tobago is a democratic republic, not a kingdom. And those who have reservations should not be vilified.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.