Wired868 Wired868 for smart sport news and opinion
Three days ago Keith Rowley had my jaw on the floor. Three days later, it’s still there. But for entirely different reasons.
By now you’ve heard about “EmailGate”, or as I like to call it: “Keep Calm and Change Yuh PassWord!”
Opposition Leader Keith Rowley lead another No Confidence Motion against Kamla and her Motley Crew, this time levelling allegations that were nothing short of criminal against the Prime Minister, the AG, the Minister of Labour, Works, The Kitchen, The Kitchen Sink Toute Bagai and everyone’s favourite lapdog and baggage carrier, Gallery Griffith.
According to 30+ email exchanges read out by Rowley in Parliament on Monday, the PM and AG were well aware of the implications of S34, and were so pissed off at the diligence of reporter Denyse Renne, and DPP Roger Gaspard that they were conspiring to tap the phones of the DPP’s office, offer him a position on the judiciary as a bribe, and were considering doing harm to Ms Renne.
(Courtesy T&T Mirror)
At the centre of this latest political shitstorm seemed to be the AG. Or rather, his email accounts. One appeared to be anan@gmail.com while the other was a TSTT address.
Much ado was made about whether or not a person can have an email address shorter than 6 symbols in Parliament. Had any of the MPs on either side of the house deigned to use their Ipads to conduct a Google search (see what I did there?) they would have gotten the answer in quick time and spared me sighing heavily at the monstrous stupidity of the proceedings.
But you see, the last three days showed me in blatant terms how little we know about technology in this country. And, further, how little we know about using it to build a case.
Dr Rowley took a massive gamble accusing the government of conspiring against the office of the DPP and conspiring to harm a citizen of the country with just a pile of transcripts. To have pulled it off successfully what was required were digital files or actual screen shots of the e-mails so that the members of the doubting public would have irrefutable proof, create a significant hue and cry and catapult the powers into action.
(Courtesy Jyoti Communication)
In Rowley being the accuser, he had to realise that the burden of proof fell on him, and like the proverbial victim in a rape case, it was he who was on trial and not the perpetrator of the act of violation… Unless of course, he playing coy and allowing the PP to hang themselves with their exuberance. But, again, even that is risky, unless he holding all the trump in his hands.
Editor’s Note: Read Rhoda Bharath’s full article including the conclusion here
When in government, the People’s National Movement (PNM) speaks with the certainty of authority—decisions are made, policies defended, and dissent Read more
Professor Emerita Bridget Brereton, in her masterful 2010 contribution, All ah we is not one, highlights the development of competing Read more
“[…] The fact that our Prime Minister would openly applaud extrajudicial killings as a solution to drug trafficking was troubling to Read more
The late Austin Clarke published A Passage Back Home as a tribute to his friend, Samuel Selvon in 1994 (the Read more
“[…] The Government’s position, as expounded by the Prime Minister and the Foreign Affairs Minister, is not neutrality by any Read more
“[…] Today the government is putting us on the wrong side of history and in support of a colonial and Read more
Rhoda Bharath works as a lecturer by day and remains obsessed with politics by night.
Follow her blog here: https://rhoda-bharath-jxtv.squarespace.com/
