Kangalee: Claim that workers can sacrifice wage increases for job security is a ‘Nansi story’!

“[…] During the Petrotrin shutdown saga, the OWTU actually offered to take a 15% wage cut in order to save jobs. The result? All, all, all workers were sent home.

“The Communication Workers’ Union (CWU) settled with TSTT for 5% over a five-year period 2014–2019. How many jobs were saved? Almost 1,000 jobs were lost! […]”

In this Letter to the Editor submitted to Wired868, Gerry Kangalee, education and research officer of the National Workers’ Union, contends that we’ve become our own IMF:

Photo: Petrotrin workers listen to union representatives.
(via OWTU)

Should workers agree to sacrifice decent wage increases in exchange for job security? Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley has hinted more than once that wage increases might trigger job losses. His hints come across more like a threat.

Economists and others have also taken up this cry: if you want job security you must give up decent wage increases.

Now, public sector, state enterprise and statutory authority workers have had no wage increases for almost a decade. Indeed, T&TEC workers have had a 000% increase imposed on them by the Industrial Court. The Court’s argument is that a wage increase will result in retrenchment.

My contention is that the Government’s position on wage increases is a matter of policy. In his infamous ‘dey ent riot’ 2016 speech, Finance Minister Colm Imbert said the Government was offering 000% for 2015–2017. He later told the media it was not a wage freeze, rather, it was ‘wage restraint.’

I prefer to call it wage suppression—and it fits neatly into the perspective of the international financial agencies.

Photo: Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley (left) and Minister of Finance Colm Imbert.
(via Trinidad Express)

During the Petrotrin shutdown saga, the OWTU actually offered to take a 15% wage cut in order to save jobs. The result? All, all, all workers were sent home.

The Communication Workers’ Union (CWU) settled with TSTT for 5% over a five-year period 2014–2019. How many jobs were saved? Almost 1,000 jobs were lost! Workers who were retrenched in 2018 have not yet been paid their correct entitlements.

The Estate Police Association accepted 000% over three years from TSTT for the period 2016–2018. The result? The Estate Police Officers have all been sent home and private security contracted.

So who want to believe ‘Nansi stories’ about trading wage increases for jobs are just closing their eyes to the reality. Wage suppression/restraint/freeze is a policy position of the IMF and while Rowley says he is saving the country from the IMF, what he is doing is implementing the policies that international capitalists have developed to force working people to pay for the capitalist crisis.

Is like we imposing IMF policies without even seeking IMF financial support. Like we is more IMF than the IMF.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: T&T should be wary of ‘friendship’ with USA, and implications of Venezuela conflict

“[…] It is clear that this Administration, having outsourced its decision-making with respect to relations with Venezuela, has not learnt Read more

Dear Editor: Home Invasion Bill is practical evolution of existing law—not ‘political comfort food’

“[…] Critics may dismiss the [Home Invasion] Bill as mere ‘political comfort food’.  Its purpose is practical: to bridge gaps Read more

St Louis: Workers still exploited due to divided Trade Union Movement

With three federations and fractured choices, the Trade Union Movement remains divided and workers continue to pay the price. Instead Read more

Dear Editor: Why Home Invasion Act is legal equivalent of political comfort food

“[…] The Home Invasion Bill does not expand rights for householders. It does not reshape murder elements... What it does do is reassure Read more

Noble: Our leaders are writing bad cheques—T&T can only ignore reality for so long

This week, two quotes came to mind as I read the local newspapers. The first was from Benjamin Franklin, who Read more

Dr Harris: The economic cost of war—why T&T could lose big from US-Venezuela conflict

“[…] For neighbouring countries [of war sites], output falls by 10% on average after five years while inflation rises by Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: T&T should be wary of ‘friendship’ with USA, and implications of Venezuela conflict

“[…] It is clear that this Administration, having outsourced its decision-making with respect to relations …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.