McIntyre: Kamla Persad-Bissessar: A Cautionary Tale—from pioneer to parody

The trajectory of Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s political career is a cautionary tale to any who would assume that gender presupposes good governance.

In the months before the 2010 election, there were valid queries about questionable construction projects and a frightening escalation of the crime rate under then leader of government and the People’s National Movement (PNM)—now deceased Patrick Manning.

Additionally, there were Manning’s tyrannical tendencies and overweening arrogance.

Photo: UNC political leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar celebrates victory at the 2010 General Elections.
(Copyright Frederic Dubray/AFP 2015)

The then People’s Partnership, a coalition of political entities led by the honourable Persad-Bissessar, promoted the concept of ‘new politics’ as the antidote to the outdated PNM/UNC partisan culture. Added to this pitch was the fact that the campaign was led by a woman.

To many, this was a good thing of itself and a sub-campaign was formed promoting Kamla on account of her gender—with the reasoning that it was imperative to support a woman in a male-dominated forum. Of course, this is correct.

Demographics that have been systematically disenfranchised should be supported within those systems. This is a necessary move towards equity.

However, the problem here is, as with anyone else, the continued support of someone who has not performed adequately, especially if more effective options are present. The situation is more pronounced when this person’s performance impacts on matters of national interest, with long lasting and far reaching effects.

Persad-Bissessar was mentored within the once formidable National Alliance for Reconstruction (NAR). Throughout her political career, she referred to this as a point of validity for her leadership role.

Photo: Former Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar (right) and then Jamaica Prime Minister Portia Simpson-Miller greet each other at a Caribbean Community (CARICOM) leaders meeting at the University of the West Indies on 9 April 2015 in Kingston.
(Copyright AFP 2016/Mandel Ngan)

She ascended through the ranks of the United National Congress (UNC) and was the first female attorney general of Trinidad and Tobago. I remember that day in 1996 when she was replaced as AG by Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj.

As a young feminist I saw this as a misogynist act by the then government. Notwithstanding her qualifications, she was made to look as though she was simply standing in for a man.

I remember the indignation I felt looking at her subsequent televised address. As she approached the platform, Bob Marley’s ‘No Woman No Cry’ played.

By that time, Kamla had already developed a strong emotional connection with the public. Her struggle for recognition within a patriarchal political system reverberated with the story of every woman—including mine.

It is understandable to me, therefore, that many held the vision of Kamla dear. If what happened in the 2020 General Election was a case of Persad-Bissessar being held to higher standards than her male counterparts or unfairly critiqued on the basis of gender, we’d be having an entirely different conversation. This is not the case.

Photo: UNC political leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar (centre) has a word with fellow MPs (from left) Michelle Benjamin, Anita Haynes, Vandana Mohit and Khadijah Ameen.
(Copyright Office of the Parliament 2020)

If anything, Kamla continued to receive the benefit of doubt from many in civil society and the wider public because she is a woman.

Part of the legacy of Kamla’s term in office is a slew of poorly conceived and managed fiscal policies that benefited her supporters and left the country in a dire economic state.

Even more damaging was the 2011 State of Emergency—questioned for its legality—which saw the suspension of citizens’ constitutional rights and a curfew with the state granted authority to detain people without query. To date there is no reliable report to measure the effectiveness of this campaign.

Six districts were labelled ‘hot spots’ and remain the targets of police persecution, marked by race and class.

In 2017, I was deeply troubled by the Kamla-led Opposition’s refusal to back an amendment to the Marriage Acts to discontinue child marriages, which disproportionately disadvantages girls. Trinidad and Tobago’s first woman prime minister and opposition leader chose instead to indirectly support an institution that robbed girls of the full potential of their lives.

Photo: Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar (left) attempts to touch the feet of India President of India Shrimatee Pratibha Patil (an act referred to as “Goar Lagay”) after receiving the Pravasi Samaan Award in Jaipur.
The “Goar Lagay” is believed to be a Hindu ritual performed by children to parents and parents to grand-parents especially after doing “artis”.
(Copyright AFP 2015)

In this historic moment, Kamla failed to exercise her political will in the interest of the most vulnerable in her gender demographic. From 2010 to now—and more acutely in the months before the 2020 general election—the duty of care that should be given to domestic policies and international diplomacy appeared to have exited the scope of Kamla’s politics.

This led to doubts about her goodwill towards the nation and weakened her stewardship as the leader of the United National Congress, which remains one of the country’s most established and impactful political parties with a venerable history of representing previously marginalised communities.

In the build-up to the 10 August election, racist blogs and social media posts flourished, as a slew of reprehensible UNC advertisements ran for weeks on television, social media and in national newspapers.

In these, African heritage personae were presented in deplorable economic and social conditions.

Photo: UNC political leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar shares the controversial Trinity Triangle ad in the build-up to the 10 August 2020 General Election.

The People’s National Movement (PNM) has its own history of race baiting, with Dr Eric Williams’ ‘recalcitrant minority’ speech or, in more recent times, the ‘Calcutta ship’ reference or the sari skit. But there is a difference in accountability between the two parties.

In a pre-election rally, Kamla referred to Prime Minister Keith Rowley as ‘the black man’. However, although a recording of the speech was available, she later insisted that she said ‘blank’ and tried to elude responsibility for her statement. (‘Blank’ might even be worse as it seems to erase the humanity and personhood of the subject.)

Further to the racist campaign were Kamla’s Trump-like remarks when addressing the most immediate and presently most consequential matter of public health: Covid-19.

Her unscientific claim about sunlight and other homeopathic remedies as a foil to the virus, showed a dismissal of official information coming from the World Health Organization (WHO) and contradicted measures urged by chief medical officer Dr Roshan Parasram.

Surely, with such an illustrious career as an attorney at law, she should understand the implications of equating months abroad, through closed borders, in the interest of public health to slavery and indentureship—a system of forced labour and systemic oppression on the basis of race, or another system of labour characterised by terrible working conditions and socio-political marginalisation.

Photo: UNC leader and Siparia MP Kamla Persad-Bissessar (background) hits the campaign trail during the run up to the 10 August 2020 elections.
(via UNC)

Like Trump, Kamla appeared to be appealing to race and emotions and catering manifestly towards a misinformed electorate.

Following the election on 10 August, she questioned the veracity of the Elections and Boundaries Commission (EBC) and had to be coaxed into a concession, which had a critical omission. She failed to resign with immediate effect as political leader, even as she voiced this ironically timely reflection:

“[…] One must accept responsibility for mistakes made whether you were aware of them or not, whether you had any control over them or not… some of them you make on your own.”

Kamla was not only the first woman prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago but also the first woman prime minister of Indian heritage outside of India and other southern Asian countries.

Now, her legacy also includes racist campaigns and a stream of political defeats. Once eloquent and poised, she has become a rambler—her words slurred. Her brilliant image of ‘new politics’ was destroyed.

Photo: UNC political leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar.
(via UNC)

She has become a caricature: Kamla the drunk. Kamla the racist. Kamla the puppet.

Worse than her past and present misjudgments was her threat of the future, as she prepared a new foundation with characters of questionable reputations who would have become government ministers.

Kamla belongs to a demographic that has historically been on the receiving end of reduction. She should understand the marginalisation, festish-isation and sensationalisation meted out to women, as our country struggles in the post-Independence era to move past racial stereotypes of Indian and African heritage women.

Indeed, women of all races are suppressed on the basis of gender. But Kamla cannot justify support by virtue of being a woman alone.

The trajectory of Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s career as a politician is one that anyone who assumes public office would do well to heed. It is my ardent hope that the current leadership of the United National Congress will be replaced with critical thinkers, who understand and respond sensitively to the complexities of our culturally heterogeneous nation.

Photo: Opposition Leader and UNC political leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar.
(Copyright Office of the Parliament 2020)

Without prejudice, may 2025 bring fresh faces, progressive ideas, focused debates, just policies and tactful diplomacy in the interest of all citizens of the republic.

A luta continua!

More from Wired868
Daly Bread: A basis for general election choices

At the end of last week’s column, I described the Opposition United National Congress (UNC) after the results of its Read more

Daly Bread: The cracked facades, as we head towards general elections

Last week I closed by referring to our democracy’s dysfunctional concentration on personalities and tribal loyalties. This dysfunction acts as Read more

Daly Bread: Battling in Opposition space; can Paray or Mickela articulate feasible crime plan?

With increasing frequency, our editorial writers and commentators treat with our dismal crime situation, which is now oppressing the entire Read more

Orin: The potential cost of UNC’s civil war

“[…] Ever since she ran in 2015 on a leader-centric election marketing campaign that sold the virtues of Kamla The Read more

Daly Bread: Government extends blame game while crime rampages on

For some weeks this column had been focused on the good, the bad and the ugly of Carnival and its Read more

Dear Editor: Broad hair guidelines no match for racist beliefs: how MOE erred

“[…] The official Ministry of Education press release announcing the hair code […] works to trivialise the issue and divorce Read more

Check Also

Daly Bread: A basis for general election choices

At the end of last week’s column, I described the Opposition United National Congress (UNC) …


  1. “illustrious career as an attorney at law”

    Really? Can you name one case of note in which she was a lead attorney and not a co-joined bench rider?

    Or one case of note in which she she made a notable legal argument?

  2. Fake Praises. This article is weak and disingenuous, but, not without irony. Ms Mcintyre was “deeply troubled” by the gender and child issues, but no specific mention of the VICIOUS, widespread, state sanctioned anti-african racism between 1995-2001 and 2010-2015. False equivocations of Dr. Williams’ maligned speech, Hilton Sandy’s JUSTIFIED warning to Tobagonians, and an obviously well meaning, metaphorical and maligned skit, with the anti-african hate which poured out the UNC via commercials, social media and all other Media?Typical, third Wave, Non-African identified feminist perspectives…Ms Mcintyre appears to be one of ‘those’ who feels her gender and other identities trump her african identity, and assumes indian women are also of the same loyalties. Her deliberate separation of kamla’s leadership from the UNC’s narrative and legacy as if some sort of anamoly is very telling. How could manning have dictatorial tendencies AND call general elections 1 year before due? Were basdeo and kamla also dictatorial? Hilton Sandy’s ‘Calcutta Ship’ statement was JUSTIFIED by the behaviour of kamla’s administration and supporters’ settlement colonialistic behaviour observed by all. The Sari Skit was an overtly obvious harmless metaphor for traditional UNC indian supporters changing allegiances (fantasy) from yellow to red. Dr. Williams’ much maligned speech is conspicuously soundbit out of context, with no mention of the sentences or paragraphs before or after “Hostile & Recalcitrant”.

  3. This is a thought provoking and well written article. I appreciate the perspective.

  4. I am sorry, but this has many flaws.
    First of all, Kamla the drunk? Really? The woman had a glass of wine and you call her a drunk? Where was this criticism when Dr. Keith Rowley was playing carnival with beer in his hands? At least Mrs. Bissesar was decent.
    Secondly, while her ‘hotspots’ of crime may have seemed racially discriminatory, has anyone ever bothered to check the statistics?
    Thirdly, the one I fine most startling, racist blogs. Her campaigns did not show all africans as poor or in need. She simply showed the people who were willing to say out loud that they need help.
    Then, her ‘sunlight will kill covid’ remark. As a journalist I am surprised you did not se this as the figure of speech it was. I believe that it was clear that it meant she could handle this pandemic better than the People’s National Movement would.
    Also, has anyone even vaguely listened to the woman’s campaign speech?
    She said blank numerous times before in her speech, and in relation to that said ‘blank man’, and not as a disrespectful term, but because she did not see the need to say his name. Has anyone ever heard of context?
    Finally, all she did was ask for the numerous discrepancies in the elections to be pointed out. Had she conceded, we wouldn’t have seen exactly how many irregularities that there are. Some of those irregularities are still being discovered.
    This was a well written article, and you got your points across. Alot of her numerous great actions done while she was in office as PM were not mentioned. But I fail to see how twisting a woman’s words until they make no sense acts as proof that she is unfit leader, or, and I quote, “from Pioneer to Parody”.

    • There is one other flaw: there is no mention of the fact that she pays her trolls alot of money– even if English is not their forte.

      A major oversight, don’t you fine?

  5. It is a superbly crafted and timely piece – thank you, Ms McIntyre.
    Just a minor correction: Ms Persad-Bissessar was not “… also the first woman prime minister of Indian heritage outside of India and other southern Asian countries”. Pakistan, Sri Lanka and at least one other country beat us to that.

    • Pakistan and Sri Lanka are south Asian countries, sir. Amanda is right, she was the first female PM of Indian heritage OUTSIDE of India or south Asia.

  6. Good article.. Many thanks for this lucid and clear-eyed piece.

  7. I sincerely hope I am not dismissed as racist for commenting that this would have been ten times more powerful a piece if the woman writing it were Indian. It would have suggested, in my view, a giant step forward for, inter alia, politics in the country.

    But I guess we have to rejoice that it is coming from a woman. That, I think, is a baby step forward.

    • Wonderfully written, Amanda.
      Two things to note. One, Dr. Williams’ “recalcitrant minority” have been taken out of context and used to demonize him for the past few decades. In his speech, he said that he is not talking about the people of India that produced Gandhi, but a group in T&T. Two, Kamla did not have a career as an illustrious attorney. In fact, she was never an attorney of repute.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.