Dear Editor: Confused about Judge’s advice to TTUTA

EPL Infrafred Sauna

In a recent high court ruling, Justice Vasheist Kokaram dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Trinidad and Tobago Unified Teachers Association (TTUTA). The teachers asserted that the marking of school-based assessments (SBAs) for the CSEC and CAPE examinations did not fall under their contractual obligations.

The following Letter to the Editor questioning the judgement in the TTUA SBA case was sent to Wired868 by Fatimah Mohammed of Cunupia:

Photo: Teacher at a whiteboard.

I am puzzled at the recent advice given by high court judge Vasheist Kokaram in the complaint by the T&T Unified Teachers’ Association (TTUTA) on whether teachers should continue marking school-based assessments (SBAs).

In his 60-page judgement, Kokaram advised that the dispute should be dealt with by a special tribunal of the industrial court. He also said the issues relating to the contractual obligation of teachers were ‘in essence a labour dispute’.

However, according to the Industrial Relations Act (1972, amended in 1994), lecturers and teachers cannot take their disputes to the industrial court because they are not deemed as ‘workers’.

Section 3 (c) of the Act states: “For the purposes of this Act, no person shall be regarded as a worker if he is … a member of the Teaching Service as defined in the Education Act, or is employed in a teaching capacity by a university or other institution of higher learning …”

Can someone please explain if teachers can take their complaints to the industrial court, especially if they feel they were unfairly dismissed or retrenched?

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: 1% ordering what they can’t eat by weakening Industrial Court

“[…] What do the employers and the one percent want? The objective is to maximise their profits by minimising their Read more

Noble: How the neo-liberal myth of ‘Me, Myself and I’ poisoned T&T society

Our teachers’ day of ‘rest and reflection’ is entirely unsurprising. It is the natural outcome of events that began in Read more

Kangalee: Claim that workers can sacrifice wage increases for job security is a ‘Nansi story’!

“[…] During the Petrotrin shutdown saga, the OWTU actually offered to take a 15% wage cut in order to save Read more

Mottley: Rethinking confrontation; the pitfalls of the government and public sector’s existing relations

“[…] For many decades, T&T’s highly productive energy sector funded disproportionately high standards of living in its non-energy sectors, including Read more

St Louis: Industrial Court’s T&TEC judgement is a huge body blow for social justice

The Industrial Court delivered a judgement on 18 February 2022 and ruled that it would be too expensive for T&TEC Read more

Paul: Unions must focus on short-term contracts and labour-supply contractors, not vaccines!

“[…] Employers, including state enterprises, […] are retrenching their workforce of both unionised and non-unionised employees and hiring labour-supply contractors, Read more

About Letters to the Editor

Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation. We don't publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.

Check Also

Dear Editor: 1% ordering what they can’t eat by weakening Industrial Court

“[…] What do the employers and the one percent want? The objective is to maximise …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.