Wired868 Wired868 for smart sport news and opinion
“[…] During public consultations, Minister Wayne Sturge went so far as to suggest that citizens might be justified in shooting police officers entering their homes, since it’s hard to determine if they are actual police or bandits…
“[…] Imagine being a police officer, doing your job, and wondering if someone might open fire on you just because they’re confused or scared. And what happens when officers start shooting first, too?
“It’s a recipe for disaster—for more blood in the streets, and even in our living rooms…”
The following Letter to the Editor on potential drawbacks of proposed stand your ground legislation was submitted to Wired868 by Osei Benn of D’Abadie:
As a concerned citizen, I understand the fear many of us feel right now. The violence, the home invasions, the heart-breaking headline—it’s enough to make anyone feel unsafe, even in their own home. But that’s exactly why we need real solutions, not risky shortcuts.
The government’s proposal to introduce a “stand your ground” law sounds tough on crime, but it’s not as simple as it seems. During public consultations, Minister Wayne Sturge went so far as to suggest that citizens might be justified in shooting police officers entering their homes, since it’s hard to determine if they are actual police or bandits.
Photo: UNC.
He offered a quote that he attributed to former Justice Hubert Volney that “it was better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by six”, in order to justify his frightening and reckless rhetoric. But all this talk does is sends a message that could get people killed.
Imagine being a police officer, doing your job, and wondering if someone might open fire on you just because they’re confused or scared. And what happens when officers start shooting first, too?
It’s a recipe for disaster—for more blood in the streets, and even in our living rooms.
Martin was killed by George Michael Zimmerman on 26 February while Zimmerman was on neighborhood watch patrol in the gated community of The Retreat at Twin Lakes, Florida.
Photo: Joe Raedle/ Getty Images.
What’s worse is that this law isn’t even necessary. Trinidad and Tobago’s common law already protects the right to defend your home.
In 2023, a woman who shot and killed an intruder in her home was not charged because she acted in self-defence. The police and legal experts agreed: she did what she had to do, and the law was already on her side. (Trinidad Express, 19 June 2023.)
We need real action: smarter policing, stronger communities, faster justice. Not laws that turn neighbours into vigilantes and homes into battlegrounds.
We all want to feel safe. But this isn’t the way.
“[…] Please do not incur excessive debt to fulfil campaign promises or popular votes. Continuous deficit financing and public debt Read more
When in government, the People’s National Movement (PNM) speaks with the certainty of authority—decisions are made, policies defended, and dissent Read more
“[…] Basic economic theory does not always manifest in practice—in fact, it rarely does. To understand if or by how Read more
“[…] The Industrial Court wields quasi-constitutional powers in employment matters. It issues binding decisions affecting the rights of workers, unions, and employers. Read more
“[…] The fact that our Prime Minister would openly applaud extrajudicial killings as a solution to drug trafficking was troubling to Read more
“[…] The morning began with a scene of casual dehumanisation. We were herded like livestock into the entrance of the Read more
Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com.
Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation.
We don’t publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.
I agree we need smarter policing, stronger communities and a more efficient justice system. These take time and effort to attain andbwhich the gov’t isn’t prepared to expend any effort/resources on. The most natural alternative it seems is to arm everyone and in so doing hope to put enough fear into bandits/lawbreakers. This is as reckless and irresponsible as it gets and even worse is to dress it up as a mandate given to them by 300 plus thousand voters who voted for them out of an electorate of approx 1.1million voters.
I will always question the efficacy of the police when it comes to critical thinking. Taking people with five O-levels, considered almost to fail within the education system, and hoping to make them guardians of law and order, to understand complexities of law and indeed, the rule of law, seems an exercise in futility. The morass of decay that you experience, was not built on a foundation of thinking skills, neither was it built yesterday.