Dear Editor: FULs could also terrorise women in domestic violence cases

“[…] The presence of firearms in a household where there is a history of domestic violence increases the risk of lethal outcomes.

“[…] The use of firearms by abusers in cases of domestic violence can extend beyond fatal outcomes. Firearms can be employed as tools to exert control, intimidate, and inflict harm or fear on victims…”

The following Letter to the Editor on the potential danger of a Firearm User’s License (FUL), potentially within the context of domestic violence, was submitted to Wired868 by Orson Rogers of Belmont:

Amidst the clamour for more FULs (34,000 pending applications) and the desire to “light them up”, we need to pause and consider some serious side effects, particularly with the dramatic increase in reported domestic violence cases in Trinidad and Tobago.

Firearms and domestic violence are interconnected in various ways, and this issue has significant social, legal, and public health implications. Here are a few points that should be considered in granting an FUL.

Risk Escalation: The presence of firearms in a household where there is a history of domestic violence increases the risk of lethal outcomes. Research has shown that the presence of a firearm can make domestic violence situations more dangerous, as the likelihood of homicide increases when firearms are involved.

Protection Orders: Individuals subject to domestic violence protection orders or restraining orders should be prohibited from owning or possessing firearms as a measure to reduce the risk of further violence and harm.

Legal Measures: Many countries have implemented laws that restrict firearm access for individuals with a history of domestic violence.  Trinidad & Tobago should consider laws that involve prohibiting individuals convicted of certain domestic violence offenses from owning firearms.

Research has consistently shown that the presence of firearms in domestic violence situations escalates the risk of homicide. Firearms can quickly turn a violent situation into a fatal one due to their lethal nature.

The use of firearms by abusers in cases of domestic violence can extend beyond fatal outcomes. Firearms can be employed as tools to exert control, intimidate, and inflict harm or fear on victims.

Some ways in which abusers might use firearms to exert power or control in domestic violence situations include:

Threats: The mere presence of a firearm can be used as a threat to coerce or intimidate the victim. The abuser might brandish the firearm to create fear and exert control over the victim.

Physical Harm: Firearms can be used to cause physical injury to victims without necessarily leading to a fatality. The abuser might use the firearm to shoot or physically assault the victim.

Psychological Impact: The knowledge that an abuser possesses a firearm can create an atmosphere of constant fear and terror for the victim. This psychological manipulation can be an effective tool for control.

Isolation: Abusers might use the threat of firearms to isolate victims from friends, family, and support networks, making it harder for the victim to seek help or escape the situation.

Preventing Help: The presence of a firearm can deter victims from seeking help or reporting the abuse, as they might fear retaliation.

Escalation: The presence of firearms can escalate the intensity of abusive behaviour and make it harder for victims to escape the cycle of abuse.

Manipulation: Abusers might use firearms to manipulate the victim into complying with their demands or staying in the abusive relationship.

The use of firearms to terrorize and control victims in cases of domestic violence underscores the urgent need for measures to prevent access to firearms by individuals with histories of domestic violence.

It’s important for society to recognize the multifaceted dangers that firearms can pose in domestic violence scenarios and to work towards comprehensive solutions that prioritize victim safety and well-being.

I hope that the various advocacy groups and organizations work to raise awareness about the link between firearms and domestic violence.

More from Wired868

Dear Editor: The sell-out of Rocky Point; the problem with Aboud’s Tobago deal

“[…] (John Aboud’s Superior Hotels) consistently refused to adjust the project’s scale, design, or mitigation strategies, demonstrating a profound lack Read more

Dear Editor: T&T must take waste management seriously; it’s a public health and environmental hazard

A recent comment from a visiting sailor has stayed with me in a way that is both embarrassing and deeply Read more

Dr Harris: Valuing workers is only way to avoid brain drain and retain T&T’s best assets

“[…] In his 1971 book The Mechanics of Independence, ANR Robinson wrote that: ‘As financial rewards are lower in the Read more

When moral authority meets historical reality: the problem with Ramdeen’s religious defence

“[…] Consider slavery. The transatlantic slave trade was not opposed by scripture—it was justified by it. Genesis 9:25–27 legitimised enslavement Read more

Roses without thorns—the hollow trumpet of selective morality should be T&T’s real concern

There is a troubling pattern in our public life: moral leaders who sound their trumpets loudly, yet hollowly choosing the Read more

Dr Lutchman: “What they call will is but an echo in an empty hall”—addressing addiction

“[…] The midbrain doesn’t know the difference between a hit of cocaine and the ‘win’ of a social spotlight or Read more

Letters to the Editor

Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com.
Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation.
We don’t publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.