MSJ: New year, old politricks—Dr Rowley’s New Year message is classic misdirection

“[…] The difference between 31st December and 1st January is but a change in date… as we see the old politricks being played out in this new year. Firstly, there was the Prime Minister’s New Year’s Message in which he announced that there will be a series of public consultations on crime.

“It was as if Dr Keith Rowley has forgotten that he has been PM for seven years, during which time he announced several initiatives: the Watkins’ Committee, and the crime and violence is a public health issue with a Committee of senior public servants to review all previous reports and make recommendations, being but two…”

The following Letter to the Editor on Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley’s New Year’s address to the nation was submitted by MSJ political leader David Abdulah:

Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley.
(via Office of the Prime Minister)

The year is but a week old so we are still greeting each other: happy new year. As we stated in our New Year’s Statement, however, the difference between 31st December and 1st January is but a change in date.

This has been confirmed as we see the old politricks being played out in this new year.

Firstly, there was the Prime Minister’s New Year’s Message in which he announced that there will be a series of public consultations on crime.

It was as if Dr Keith Rowley has forgotten that he has been PM for seven years, during which time he announced several initiatives: the Watkins’ Committee, and the crime and violence is a public health issue with a committee of senior public servants to review all previous reports and make recommendations, being but two.

Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley shows off his community recovery team of Anthony Watkins, Hans Des Vignes, Jamaal Shabazz, Curtis Toussaint, Akosua Edwards, Nicola Harvey, Chris Leacock and then Community Development Minister Dr Nyan Gadsby-Dolly in 2020.
The recommendations from the committee were never made public.
(via Dr Keith Rowley)

In spite of calls for the Watkins Report to be made public by laying it in Parliament, Dr Rowley has refused to do so.

What has become of the Committee of Permanent Secretaries? Have they started work? Is there an Interim Report? We are left in the dark. Now we will have public consultations, which no doubt will be a PR exercise given the PNM’s track record of the EDAB, the NTAC, the Roadmap to Recovery Report, among others.

Then we have the PNM and the UNC posturing over the person to be elected as the nation’s president.

The MSJ has already commented that who is eventually elected will not change the price of coffee, in that the system of governance as set out in the 1976 Constitution limits what the president can and cannot do.

President of the Senate Christine Kangaloo.

On the other hand, our very divisive ethnic party politics, PNM vs UNC, will result in mistrust and low public confidence in the parties’ choices. We have nothing personal against either Ms Christine Kangaloo or Mr Israel Khan but they cannot escape the fact that—either because of past political affiliations or controversial public positions taken—neither will be able to speak for or be respected by the majority of our citizens.

The statements that will now be out in the public domain, especially the talk radio shows and on social media, will reflect and amplify the ethnic/party political divide. The old politricks has been given fuel to burn. New year, same old story.

The PNM and the UNC cannot change their spots, but neither can the leader of the National Transformation Alliance, who proposed that the president should be chosen from a list of retired senior Defence Force officers.

NTA leader and former commissioner of police Gary Griffith.
(Copyright Wired868)

They are all able people and no doubt are patriotic, but the signal of having the president being a former commander of the Defence Force and a prime ministerial hopeful being a former military officer and commissioner of police will give the view of a militarised society.

The MSJ of course has not spoken to anyone to find out if they would be at all willing to serve as president. We can, however, think of some persons who are very distinguished citizens and who have an understanding of our society and what it takes to bring us together.

Two such persons are Mr Justice Peter Jamadar, former justice of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago and current justice of the Caribbean Court of Justice, and Professor Rhoda Reddock, eminent social scientist and internationally recognised advocate for women and children.

Rhoda Reddock is a professor, social scientist and former UWI deputy principal.

We hope that our mentioning their names does not cause them any embarrassment and if so, we apologise in advance. There are, we are sure, many other such persons who are equally capable of being a unifying president.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: TTPS shouldn’t be unchecked militia; investigate police “brutality” in Belmont

“[…] The officers (in the Belmont incident) wore no uniforms, bore no visible badges, and allegedly seem to give no Read more

Daly Bread: The justification for ‘Independent’ senators and special majority constraints

Several readers have pressed me to say how I felt on the merits of the Prime Minister’s Pension (Amendment) Bill, Read more

Noble: A nation at war with itself—why behaviour of Padarath, Jeremie, Elder et al affects everyone

This last week, those of us who follow cricket witnessed a South African batsman and stand-in captain refuse to chase Read more

Dear Editor: Public figures must stop reckless habit of filming while driving

“[…] Public figures—especially elected officials—have enormous influence. Their actions speak louder than their speeches. “When they film themselves while driving, Read more

St Louis: UNC guilty of mass retrenchments; but PNM left workers vulnerable

The recent article by Ashton Ford, former general secretary of the People’s National Movement (PNM), attempts to paint the PNM Read more

Dear Editor: Club Eting’s shooting highlights dangers of TTPS officers taking guns home

“[…] In other countries where off-duty firearm carry is allowed, it is done with strict safeguards: ongoing psychological assessments, secure Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: My issue with our health facilities—where Arima gets high and low marks

My experience at the Arima hospital today was mixed. It was mostly sweet, mind you. …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.