Home / View Point / Letters to the Editor / Dear Editor: It is wrong for Weekes to be required to declare her sexual orientation!

Dear Editor: It is wrong for Weekes to be required to declare her sexual orientation!

“Is that a new standard that the society is being asked to now adopt? Are our colonial hang-ups and archaic societal constructs so rigid and prejudiced that we cannot see beyond a person’s sexual orientation to determine if (s)he is competent to perform a task for the benefit of the nation?

“Assuming but not accepting that the President-elect was of that persuasion, how would that impact on the performance of her official duties?”

The following Letter to the Editor, which raises questions about the relevance of the President-elect’s sexual orientation to her appointment, was submitted to Wired868 by Satyanand Maharaj, Spiritual Head of the Satya Anand Ashram in Aranguez.

Photo: Trinidad and Tobago President-elect, Paula-Mae Weekes.
(Copyright CNC3)

It is indeed extremely unfortunate the President-elect Paula-Mae Weekes was essentially forced to declare her sexual orientation after social media trolls began spreading propaganda and hate asserting that she was a lesbian.

How exactly does the sexual orientation of the President-elect have anything to do with the competence of the individual elected?

Is that a new standard that the society is being asked to now adopt? Are our colonial hang-ups and archaic societal constructs so rigid and prejudiced that we cannot see beyond a person’s sexual orientation to determine if (s)he is competent to perform a task for the benefit of the nation?

Assuming but not accepting that the President-elect was of that persuasion, how would that impact on the performance of her official duties? To suggest that the sexual orientation of a person would affect his/her job performance is akin to stating that the sexual orientation of the Chief Justice would affect the justice dispensed by the courts.

Sexual orientation has no place in the selection of a candidate for any job subject to very rare and extraordinary exceptions. Our nation’s common law and constitutionally guaranteed rights make provision for equality of rights of all citizens, irrespective of creed and race as well as of sexual orientation.

Photo: Chief Justice and JLSC chairman Ivor Archie (left) signs a MOU for use of a new automated Case Management Information System. (Copyright Judiciary of Trinidad and Tobago)

Previously, I had expressed concerns that the Government could not have found a single qualified Hindu for the position of president and thereby make history. Having regard to the election of Paula-Mae Weekes, as a nation we must respect the appointment and not attempt to sully the good name of the President-elect before she assumes office.

The Hindu view is that we reincarnate several times, also switching gender as we are born again and again. Hindu astrology also points out that, in one of these births, while the body may have an assigned gender as male or female, the person will have to choose his/her sexual orientation.

Discrimination under any guise such as race, religion and sexual orientation is offensive and reprehensible. In the history of Trinidad and Tobago from their arrival in 1845 to the very recent past, Indians in general and Hindus in particular have borne the brunt of State-sanctioned discrimination in various forms. It is therefore inconceivable that any Hindu can participate in any discussion that accepts State discrimination.

It is time that the Parliament debate the issue of protection of rights of all citizens who may have a different sexual orientation and keep up with the rest of the modern world.

About Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor
Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com. Please keep your blog between 300 to 800 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation.

Check Also

Dear Editor: Religious and feminist factions competing to provide sex education—both are wrong

“The Family Planning Association in its own statement on the issue admits that Comprehensive Sex …

202 comments

  1. You are hearing what they are not saying.

  2. has anyone seen her qualifications? prey tell how is she to have all of that under her belt AND raise a family at the same time. one or the other would fall at the wayside and we’ve seen this way too often.

  3. everyone is entitled to his/her own preferences…

  4. Was it social media trolls which forced her to declare her sexuality or was it the Trinidad Guardian interview legitimizing the nonsense?

  5. So where will she get her Moral Authority to direct Youths

  6. DO NOT let Teri read this Brett Bulling

  7. Really,would they have asked a man that? And what does that have to do with anything.Steups. Contrary to popular belief women do not need to ‘have a man ‘ to validate their humanity or sexuality.
    Where are we going with this? Why did that ‘reporter’ deem this question necessary. Why is it that the sensational is what these new fangled reporters always go for. News flash ! Some of us prefer the evidence of some depth of thought going into the questions.

  8. There is another important point – the sexist element to the story. So what if she’s unmarried with no children? Why should that immediately raise questions of her sexuality? Would a man have been subjected to this nonsense? As Lasana noted, no one ever questioned President Carmona about his sex life! Steups. Does anyone at the T&T Guardian even read international news to understand the current climate?

    • I guess our dailies are turning into the Enquirer-no journalism standards required.
      Wonder what MATT thinks of this? (Is the head still a woman, or was there a recent election? Slips me atm).
      Moreover, I wonder why there wasn’t more national outrage on her behalf.
      I also think the media may be pushing the boundaries to see what they can get away with, which is why I agree with Lasana Liburd about her answering, though in the context I can understand why she did.
      Hmm. Wonder what the response would have been had the answer been ‘yes’, true or just being cheeky!