Daly Bread: Understanding reputational damage; watering the brandy of the JLSC

Referring to the unattractive salary and conditions of service of judges at that time, then Chief Justice Sir Isaac Hyatali, in October, 1978 made his famous statement that “We were heading for a situation in which the brandy will have to be watered considerably to fill future vacancies on the Bench.”

He returned to that theme in October, 1980 when he said that the inability to find fit and proper persons to fill vacancies in the law departments of the State had “reached the point where we may well have to drown the brandy with water instead of merely watering it, in order to fill the staggering number of vacancies in the Judicial and Legal Service.”

Photo: A judge calls for order.

When dealing with the Judiciary, CJ Hyatali no doubt chose brandy as the symbol of a desired standard of potency and refinement.

I do not reference his comments in order to describe the quality of the current Supreme Court Bench. There are many fine judges and the terms and conditions of service in the Judiciary are considerably better than they were 30 years ag, at the time of CJ Hyatali’s expression of grave concern.


However, refinement is certainly lacking in the affairs of the current Chief Justice when he refuses to treat with the existing serious allegations against him. Left out there unanswered, these allegations have damaged and will continue to damage the office and the reputation of the Judiciary as an institution.

A major casualty has been the Judicial and Legal Service Commission (the JLSC), of which it might be fairly said that the brandy has been drowned by the stinky water of the Marcia Ayers-Caesar mess.

Moreover, under the leadership of the currently impugned Chief Justice, the JLSC is continuing to make appointments to the High Court. Given the protected tenure of a Judge’s office and the current ages at which persons are being appointed, these appointments may be binding on two generations. That’s a long time for regret if regret becomes necessary.

Photo: President Anthony Carmona (centre) appoints High Court judges Kevin Ramcharan (left), Marcia Ayers-Caesar (second from left) and Avason Quinlal-Williams (right) in April 2017.
Also in the photo is Chief Justice and JLSC chairman Ivor Archie (second from right). Ayers-Caeser subsequently resigned on the instruction of the JLSC.

An additional concern of CJ Hyatali was that, if the Judiciary was not properly renewed, then “attrition and decay constitute a gnawing threat to the strength and integrity of the Judiciary and attendant thereon is the ever dwindling influence of law in society.”


How right CJ Hyatali has turned out to be when the Prime Minister and the normally supine business community are driven to condemn what they see as intolerable lawlessness and bitter anger in the society, even though they evade connecting the dots between the anger, the lawlessness—including the brazen oppression occurring at Angostura—and the deficiencies in the administration of justice.

It is also arguable that the Caribbean Court of Justice will continue not to gain traction as observers may justifiably fear that frolics outside of the restraint required of a Judge may infect good administration in that august body as well.

It is now well established that the meaning of “misbehaviour” within those constitutional provisions that regulate impeachment refers to any conduct detrimental to the good standing of an office-holder in the eyes of the public.

In its decision in a hearing on a report concerning the Chief Justice of Gibraltar, seven members of the Privy Council adopted and declared as the law that:

Photo: Chief Justice and JLSC chairman Ivor Archie lays a wreath at Memorial Park, Port-of-Spain on 8 November 2009.
(Copyright News.gov.tt)

“In order to constitute misbehaviour by the holder of an office, the conduct concerned need not be criminal conduct and need not occur in the course of the performance of the duties of the office.

“The conduct of the person concerned might be such that it affects directly the person’s ability to carry out the office. Alternatively, or in addition, it may affect the perceptions of others in relation to the office, so that any purported performance of the duties of the office will be perceived widely as corrupt, improper or inimical to the interests of the persons, or the organisation, for whose benefit the functions of the office are performed.”

The decision ultimately declares that if the outcome of the impugned conduct is likely to damage the perception of the office, then “the conduct is properly characterised as misbehaviour for the purposes of the relevant legislation.”

Is anybody understanding our dangerous descent?

More from Wired868
Daly Bread: Understanding political risk of T&T’s reliance on Venezuela gas

Exposure to assessing business risk, including the political risk of doing business in unstable environments, underlines that political and geo-political Read more

Daly Bread: The Gov’t rests on withered laurels, while public lacks feasible alternative

Resignation from political office is a rare event in our country and I had intended to comment on the significance Read more

Daly Bread: No more mamaguy with GI—looking at pan certification

I have taken time to evaluate my doubts about the announcement made on 9 August concerning Geographical Indication certification for Read more

Daly Bread: Hiding the Stanley John report

A file in the civil law department of the Attorney General (the AG) disappeared. As a consequence, the department failed Read more

Daly Bread: Being the solution we seek—time for T&T to stand up

As I close off three weeks of analysis of pan manufacturing, I will refer to the inspiration to be taken Read more

Daly Bread: Reclaiming pan manufacturing; and Pan Trinbago’s controversial headquarters

“All those initiatives are undermined by the fact that in 2024, the Steelpan Manufacturing sector does not have a dedicated Read more

Check Also

Daly Bread: Understanding political risk of T&T’s reliance on Venezuela gas

Exposure to assessing business risk, including the political risk of doing business in unstable environments, …

12 comments

  1. You can take a man out of the gutter……

  2. Leave the blinking Chief Justice alone.

  3. Archie needs to remove himself from behind the nameless and faceless judges and publicly explain his role if any in the allegations against him.

  4. Regarding this farcical court of the Caribbean court of justice
    It’s
    Quite premature to have made this huge recurring investment on the whims of some supposedly learned judges and shrewd politicians
    That continues to bleed the treasury of all its signatories
    Something must be established in the interim that puts this on hold for the simple reason that there is enough proof that the privy council is the only safe court where justice can be had in light of the political biases that is prevalent not merely in the interferences that takes place by politicians but now by those who are custodians of justice taking on bold faces in light of accusations
    As well as persons sitting on integrity bodies showing they are not trustworthy at all
    E.g. emailgate which was one of the biggest bull shit political mess where a prime minister was tainted by hooliganism of an opposition leader who became prime minister and a judge on integrity commission posted undertones of disagreement when the same body threw out the matter for being a joke and a hoax

    This can never be forgotten
    The Caribbean court of justice will never work in these banana republic states
    Yet
    Billions of dollars are being sinked to prop up the lie that it most work because we are evolved away from colonialism
    When we are still merely colonial in our thinking having only replaced massa with parasitic oligarchs and imagery

  5. Ms When would these ” so called Good Citizens “…….Yes these ” Self acclaimed Paragons of Virtue ” give up ? Let them continue to speak from the ” Mountain Top” ………. We the people will speak ” RELENTLESSLY from the ” Ground”

  6. The CJ has plenty support. Since according to some, if the HDC houses weren’t free, it is ok to circumvent the process. Besides the CJ issue is a UNC made issue so we know the CJ in the right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.