Wired868 Wired868 for smart sport news and opinion
“[…] The Government’s position, as expounded by the Prime Minister and the Foreign Affairs Minister, is not neutrality by any diplomatic or regional standard.
“[…] Authority without principle, without consultation and without regard for Caricom unity and regional peace is not leadership—it is recklessness masquerading as sovereignty…”
The following guest column, which criticises the Trinidad and Tobago Government’s stance on the US-Venezuela conflict, was submitted to Wired868 by Bryan St Louis, a former education officer for the Communication Workers’ Union (CWU):
In just two days, the Government of Trinidad and Tobago issued two conflicting and deeply troubling statements on the escalating US-Venezuela standoff.
On 23rd August, Foreign Minister Sean Sobers declared a “non-interventionist” stance, dismissing regional concerns and downplaying the presence of US warships near Venezuelan waters.
Less than 24 hours later, Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar pledged support for US military action in the Caribbean, even offering Trinidadian territory should Guyana request assistance against Venezuela.
Photo: UNC.
This abrupt shift from passive neutrality to active alignment—without consultation with Caricom—signals a dangerous erosion of regional solidarity.
The Prime Minister’s assertion that Trinidad and Tobago has “no intention of engaging Caricom on this matter” is not just diplomatically reckless; it is a direct dismissal of the framework that has long defined Caribbean unity and collective security.
This posture also disregards the region’s commitment to peace, as championed by Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley.
Copyright: Office of the Parliament 2025.
Her call to preserve the Caribbean as a “zone of peace” stands in stark contrast to Trinidad and Tobago’s refusal to engage Caricom while signalling support for foreign military action. That refusal fractures a shared vision and jeopardizes both our diplomatic sovereignty and our standing as a trusted Caricom partner.
The government’s stance also breaks with the principles upheld by Alba (the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America). Founded by Venezuela and Cuba, Alba promotes solidarity, sovereignty and resistance to foreign intervention.
Trinidad and Tobago’s unilateral posture undermines these values and marks a troubling departure from the Caribbean’s tradition of principled diplomacy.
Equally troubling is the silence from coalition partners—especially those with roots in trade unionism and historic ties to the Bolivarian Movement. Many once championed solidarity with Venezuela’s socialist experiment, citing shared struggles against imperialism and exploitation.
Where are their voices now? Has political expediency eclipsed ideological conviction?
The government’s framing of US military deployment as a response to “terrorist drug cartels” ignores deeper geopolitical realities and the lived trauma of communities worldwide—wherever America advances its agenda under the guise of counterterrorism, narcotics control, or humanitarian aid.
Photo: Washington Post.
These narratives have long enabled foreign powers to pursue strategic interests under the cloak of global concern, leaving behind instability, broken sovereignty and lasting trauma across the developing world.
Despite repeated warnings from regional bodies, these pretexts continue to justify military presence and intervention—often at the expense of peace, dignity and self-determination.
As Trinidad and Tobago marks 63 years of independence, this moment demands more than silence or submission.
Photo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Caricom.
Our sovereignty was not gifted; it was earned. It must be defended—not only from external threats, but from internal decisions that erode our voice, betray our values and isolate us from the region we helped build.
The Government’s position, as expounded by the Prime Minister and the Foreign Affairs Minister, is not neutrality by any diplomatic or regional standard.
It is a clear departure from Caricom’s principles and a strategic alignment with US military interests—offered without consultation—and it diminishes our independence, distorts our values and fractures our credibility across the Caribbean.
Photo: UNC.
Yes, the Government may claim it acted within its national prerogative and authority. But the power to choose does not absolve the duty to consult.
Authority without principle, without consultation and without regard for Caricom unity and regional peace is not leadership—it is recklessness masquerading as sovereignty.
Trinidad and Tobago must not become a pawn in a larger geopolitical game. Our foreign policy should reflect peace, sovereignty and regional cooperation, not submission to external agendas.
“[…] It is clear that this Administration, having outsourced its decision-making with respect to relations with Venezuela, has not learnt Read more
A little over a week ago, on 29 November 2025, the Washington Post identified “the Caribbean allies helping the US Read more
“[…] Critics may dismiss the [Home Invasion] Bill as mere ‘political comfort food’. Its purpose is practical: to bridge gaps Read more
With three federations and fractured choices, the Trade Union Movement remains divided and workers continue to pay the price. Instead Read more
“[…] The Home Invasion Bill does not expand rights for householders. It does not reshape murder elements... What it does do is reassure Read more
October and Calypso History Month are behind us now. February and Season 2026 beckon. What lies ahead? What is in Read more
Bryan St Louis is a former education officer for the Communication Workers’ Union (CWU).
The PM may be ideologically confused. She is trying to please too many masters. Wouldn’t she have known that throwing her lot behind Trump (imagine a TNT first policy for good measure) would have incurred the wrath of the trade union movement? Just wait for the local manufacturing sector to begin feeling the pinch of this bit of absurdity. Much like what occurred with her declaration that TNT was not the ATM of the caribbean statement. The fallout of these statements and actions will be far reaching.