Home / View Point / Letters to the Editor / Dear Editor: ‘Loyal slaves’ sign removed from House of Count de Lopinot

Dear Editor: ‘Loyal slaves’ sign removed from House of Count de Lopinot

“[…] No forced-labour camp in Trinidad and Tobago or anywhere in the world should celebrate enslavers while ridiculing their victims. What prevailed at Lopinot was not just inconsistent with basic human decency and the espoused values of our republic but also with the truth that the historical evidence supports …”

The following Letter to the Editor about the removal of the sign at the House of Compte de Lopinot was submitted to Wired868 by Shabaka Khabon of the Cross Rhodes Freedom Project:

Photo: A controversial signpost at the Compte de Lopinot Historical Complex.

The shamefully misleading, unhistorical and psychologically damaging signpost, which had for decades engendered reverence for Count de Lopinot and his wife has been removed. The sign described the enslavers as ‘illustrious’ while demeaning the persons whom they trafficked and worked to death as ‘loyal slaves’.

The Cross Rhodes Freedom Project (CRFP), which launched the campaign #NoLoyalSlaves in 2017, had argued that both of these descriptions were based on racist/white-supremacist presumptions consistent with late 19th-century pseudo-science and earlier pro-slavery propaganda concocted to blunt the attack of abolitionist demands for amelioration.

The organisation had continuously lamented the incalculable damage done by this false narrative, as the plantation complex at Lopinot remains a popular destination for schools on educational field trips, as well as local and foreign visitors seeking to learn more about this country’s history.

No forced-labour camp in Trinidad and Tobago or anywhere in the world should celebrate enslavers while ridiculing their victims. What prevailed at Lopinot was not just inconsistent with basic human decency and the espoused values of our republic but also with the truth that the historical evidence supports.

Photo: Sign at House of Count de Lopinot painted black (courtesy CRFP)

The internationally renowned Trinidadian scholar C.L.R. James paints a hellish picture of the life of the enslaved population in Saint Domingue (Haiti today), where Lopinot first established his unholy enterprise. He said they ‘received the whip with more certainty and regularity than food’.

There is no evidence that anything changed upon Lopinot’s arrival in Trinidad. On the contrary, UWI Professor Emerita Bridget Brereton informs us in her book History of Modern Trinidad 1783 to 1962 that Governor Picton allowed French enslavers, including Lopinot whom she singled out, to introduce into Trinidad all their ‘savage customs and rituals’. She highlighted ‘gross overwork, malnutrition, primitive conditions, diseases, the absence of any medical care’, along with ‘tortures, mutilations and barbaric executions’.

This is the second major success for the Cross Rhodes Freedom Project, following a successful campaign to have the name of the self-professed racist and imperialist Alfred Milner removed from the oldest hall of residence at the University of the West Indies’ St Augustine Campus in 2018. But it is not the end of the initiative.

Executive member of the Lopinot Community Council and Tourism Association Donna Mora is grateful that the offending sign is gone, ‘thanks to the noble efforts of Dr Claudius Fergus and Mr Shabaka Kambon’. She now wants the relevant government entities to engage both the CRFP and the community to develop the site ‘in a more inclusive and honest way’.

The CRFP has already accomplished a lot of research on the site, starting with the indigenous people who first inhabited the area. The organisation has identified enslavers who took over the plantation after Lopinot and found the names of those African people who were enslaved there and Indians who were indentured there after arriving aboard the Fatal Razak.

Photo: A depiction of slaves serving their masters in Trinidad.
(Courtesy Netssa.com)

Along with a proposal for new signage, some of this information has already been turned over to the relevant stakeholders in the Ministry of Agriculture Lands and Fisheries through the Forestry and National Parks Division.

As Lopinot Estate is the last surviving plantation complex in Trinidad, a great deal is at stake. No effort should be spared to ensure that things are done right.

Whether we are talking about the genocide of indigenous Americans, the enslavement of Africans, the indentureship of Indians and others, or the version of apartheid that persisted in this country until independence, telling the truth about the crimes of our colonial past is not just the right thing to do, but essential to realising a deeper commitment to equality and justice in our society.

With the success of #RenameMilnerHall and changes underway at Lopinot, the CRFP can now turn its attention back to the removal of the reverential statuary of Christopher Columbus.

On 18 June 2020, having been presented with a petition signed by 10,000 people, the city corporation of Port of Spain voted to move the statue to the national museum—a fact still not widely known.

Photo: The Christopher Columbus statue in Port of Spain was defaced again on either 13 or 14 June 2020.
(via CRFP)

Mayor Joseph Martinez used his veto power to block the move and then transferred authority over the statue to the national government. This drew the ire of former Mayor Louis Lee Sing, who attributed Martinez’ vacillation to him not being ‘steeped and grounded in the history of the country’.

The Cross Rhodes Freedom Project has since written the prime minister and petitioned parliament to establish a national committee to develop ‘a comprehensive plan to identify, destroy, repurpose or reconstitute any monuments, memorials, emblems, signs, symbols or the like that celebrate, commemorate and glorify racism and white supremacy’.

This petition was read and approved in the House of Representatives on1 July 2020. On 10 July, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley promised to hold consultations on the matter after the general elections to facilitate change in a ‘civil way … on the basis of knowledge’. Any development is yet to occur.

About Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor
Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com. Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation. We don't publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.

Check Also

MSJ: Let’s stop trying to change the party in power and try changing the political arrangements

On the occasion of the 59th Anniversary of the Independence of Trinidad and Tobago, political …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

One comment

  1. It is so sickening to witness african people equate the genocide of the native peoples, the enslavement of african people under chattel slavery, with indentureship!! How despicable it is to undermine your own peoples’ history in order to gain acceptance from another!”Indentureship” and “Slavery” are made hollow words with the perverse anti-african politics of oppression olympics and the attempt to ‘compete’ with african history. The fact of the matter is that the chinese, the irish and the portugese also VOLUNTARILY MIGRATED to the caribbean through the indentureship system in order to save money and gain upward mobility. Enslaved african history DID NOT begin in 1783 with the arrival of the french and their captive africans…enslaved africans arrived and suffered under the spaniards in the 1500’s, with dutch enslavers in the 1600’s and THEN the french. Documents show africans involved in joint native american revolts against the spaniards before the mid 1500’s and dutch ships arriving with 1000 enslaved per trip, anually in the 1600’s.The narrative of indian indentureship being similar or even close to the enslaved africans’ experience is political propaganda beginning 1995.