I remember when Barack Obama won his first term as US president in 2008. Late that night I heard a massive noise of joyful screams and applause from the neighbourhood, the moment his victory was confirmed. At that point, I knew we were in for a rough ride.
In the immediate aftermath, my colleague at Trinicenter.com wrote an insightful piece titled President Barack Obama: Change…What Change? that was prophetic of Obama’s presidency.
Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, yet his two terms showed an appetite for war-making and violence, albeit cloaked beneath polished words, diplomacy, and the goodwill of many people excited to see a non-white face leading the White House.
Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton oversaw the illegal invasion of Libya, turning a stable country into a zone of conflict. Critics would describe Obama as being ‘more Bush than Bush’ as covert drone strikes were dramatically increased—some estimate ten times more than what occurred under George Bush Jr.
Despite a seemingly tense relationship with the Israeli prime minister, he signed a US$38 billion military aid package to Israel. Under the fancy rhetoric of ‘hope’ and ‘yes we can’, mass surveillance programs expanded internally and externally.
Twelve years ago, the world was ‘good copped/bad copped’ by Obama and Bush/McCain, and the cycle continues as many in the world again celebrate the election of the ‘good guy’ Joe Biden over the ‘bad guy’ Donald Trump.
Trump’s four years of blatant dishonesty, disdain for basic science, shallowness, misogyny, race-baiting, and childish behaviour gave his critics more than enough evidence that he is not a worthy leader. Trump as the supreme bad guy rightly problematises overt racism while drawing attention away from structural racism and the polite racism pervasive in white liberal circles.
Trump with all his problematic behaviour is an unwitting outlet for racial escapism, in which racism is recognised in its overt and hostile (Trumpian and Republican) forms but not in its everyday manifestations that have been so central to Euro-American capitalism.
Racism is then seen as an evil person phenomena rather than as a global, national and individual system of rewards and privileges accorded based on closeness to whiteness.
The euphoria around the victory of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is reminiscent of the Obama victory of 2008. While representation and firsts are important and have their place, we must be careful of empty symbolism (or tokenism).
For us in the Caribbean, women leaders and leaders that look like us have not transformed the structures of inequality or the complicity of governments entangled within global capitalism.
In one sense, it is easy to see how—in the context of white supremacy and patriarchy—the election of Obama then and Harris now could make many people feel good. Beyond the shallowness of these symbols, the core structures of unjust American power do not just continue but are reinforced by the notions of merit, hard work and the fulfilment of the American dream.
The differences between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Republicans are relatively crude and straightforward in promoting war, white supremacy and US imperialism as core values. While the Democrats are more measured and diplomatic.
Democrats speak the language of peace, hope and dialogue, yet behind this the internal and global violence of a declining US empire continues unabated. This explains how Trump is globally reviled (understandably so), but Obama is revered by many despite his record of war, intervention and violence.
While Trump was a clear symbol that something was wrong in the White House, Obama and the Democratic tradition of governance took the edge off the empire and lulled Americans and people globally into a state of sleep and complacency.
While the leaders of the Democratic Party extol the virtues of American democracy at home and abroad, the Democratic Party is anything but democratic.
In the 2016 Democrat Party primaries, party elites openly rallied around Hillary Clinton. The blatant rigging of internal party processes against relatively more progressive party members is a reminder of the character of the party and why the narratives of change and hope around Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are misplaced.
Yet for those who are still unconvinced, the records of both Biden and Harris are prophetic about what we should expect.
Biden spent a career in leading roles in American power structures and his legacy is anything but progressive and transformational.
In 1994, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, also called the Clinton Crime Bill or the Biden Crime Law, was passed. Biden was influential in this law that was instrumental in overwhelmingly targeting and incarcerating people of colour.
He supported the illegal US invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq and the expanded drone assassinations under president Obama.
Like Harris, he is a strong supporter of Israel. His public speeches of healing and unity seem a far cry now from back in the Civil Rights era when he opposed busing and desegregation.
Harris’ ascendency to power may seem to be an example of hard work and the shattering of a glass ceiling that hold women back. However, for anyone truly interested in justice, her record is not the example on which transformation can be built.
During her time as district attorney and attorney general, Harris is credited with a Back on Track programme (aimed at keeping young offenders out of jail), an open justice database (for public access to crime statistics) as well as implicit racial bias training for cops.
Yet, while Harris has positioned herself as progressive and a reformer, beyond a few initiatives her record is one of upholding the status quo. Harris pioneered a truancy bill that aimed to punish and jail parents of children who missed school with little consideration of the sociopolitical context that truancy occurs in.
After the Supreme Court ruled that California reduce its overcrowded prison population that was suffering starvation and inhumane treatment, Harris’ office argued that this would reduce the prison labour pool.
Harris is on record pledging unconditional support to Israel who, empowered by the strategic and special relationship it enjoys with the United States, openly defies international law and numerous UN resolutions around human rights abuses.
According to columnist Vineeta Singh: “Kamala Harris’ career shows us how, if we use our privileges correctly, play by the rules, don’t scare white people by making radical claims (for example, that poor black people matter every bit as much as any wealthy person); if we are willing to put our smiling ‘diverse’ faces as stamps of approval on white supremacist policies, we too can be the face of white supremacist mass incarceration.”
If the record of both Biden and Harris are anything to go on, then we can expect four years of little change to the internally and globally violent US state beyond smiling diverse faces, platitudes and inspirational meme-worthy gestures and words.
Beyond the feel-goodism of the Biden and Harris leadership, there are many people within the US and globally who are negatively affected by US policies. Mass surveillance and erosion of privacy, systemic racism, police brutality, US imperialism and intervention, unbridled neoliberal capitalism and the ongoing industrial prison complex are all ongoing issues that are affecting the global village.
The embeddedness of both Biden and Harris in American neoliberal capitalism that easily prioritises power and profit over people and the environments suggest that we be cautious about the hope and change that they allegedly represent.
Biden and Harris offer us a very different approach to Trump, reminding us that US imperialism does not have to be white, loud, hostile and belligerent. It can be brown, soft, polite and diplomatic.
But, professor, elections are binary.
Given the available choices, would have preferred that America re-elect the creature from the orange lagoon?
Or are you merely saying that the right choice was made but we have to be careful not to expect too much?
Mr Salandy, it is said that politics is about the art of compromise and the need for realistic practical policy decisions in the face of competing interests. Sometimes we have to select the best of the worst possible solutions. I want to believe those were the guiding principles of the Obama-Biden administration and will be those of the Biden-Harris administration. Utopia, where everybody is perfectly satisfied, is an ideal that has never been attained by any government. And never will be.
Be careful and not have unrealistic expectations.
What never ceases to amaze me is the cognitive dissonance of trinidad’s african ‘educated class’. What about Trinidad & Guyana? Where is Dr. Tye’s analysis on the racism in trinidad and guyana? What’s The difference between Satnarayan Maharaj’s (Overt) racism and Kamaluddin Mohommed (Covert) racism?.
I was not aware that Trinidad or Guyana voted out Donald Trump and that that was current news.
Hopefully that will satisfy your where-is-ism.