Demming: Fare thee well, Le Hunte; minister’s departure is loss for WASA and T&T

EPL Infrafred Sauna

“What is your miracle wish for WASA?” I once asked a former Water and Sewerage Authority (WASA) CEO.

“To convert my consumers into customers,” was the response.

More than 15 years later, another well-wisher bites the dust because of his desire to do the same thing. Both instances occurred under PNM administrations.

Photo: Water, water, water…

The fired CEO explained to me that there was a difference between a consumer and a customer. He said that a consumer can enjoy the use of a product or service but a customer must pay for that product or service in order to enjoy its use.

He explained there were just too many consumers and not enough customers paying for water. Things have changed at WASA and today many more persons will be described as customers, but the problem remains that there is a significant gap between the price we pay for water and the cost of providing the service.

Metering is the sensible business solution but that’s not going to happen before the next general elections and will be abandoned as some other administration’s problem.

If I accept the contents of former minister Robert Le Hunte’s resignation at face value, then he was on to a good thing for our country.

The message that the freeness must end will not be communicated by pleas and chats without firm action. For example, our level of compliance with Covid-19 rules increased when the enforcement became evident.

The alleged reference by the prime minister to the cost of water as the reason for water riots of 1903 is not the whole story.

Photo: Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley gestures to supporters at Balisier House after the election results on 7 September 2015.
(Courtesy Allan V Crane/Wired868)

A manuscript by KO Laurence titled ‘The Trinidad Water Riot of 1903—Reflections of an Eyewitness’ states that “the immediate cause of the Water Riot was the introduction into the Legislative Council of a new Waterworks Ordinance which was the focus of violent agitations. That agitation can only be explained in terms of a long history of dissatisfaction with the city’s water supply.”

So our dissatisfaction with an unreliable water supply is a historical problem of over 100 years, and which must be solved.

In my own lifetime, I have followed the accusations time and time again that successive governments have redirected water to favoured locations at the expense of others. ‘Water is Life’, as one of the previous WASA slogans stated goes beyond sloganeering. Wilfully denying people access to water is inhumane, unproductive and scandalous.

If, as his letter says, the goodly minister of public utilities had been working with the Inter American Development Bank (IDB) and the Ministry to implement the metering project, then we have lost an opportunity to fix a highly politicised institution, which masquerades under the guise of a public utility providing an essential service.

Imagine the transformation opportunity which could have resulted from current WASA workers coming together around the goal of metering by 2022 or whatever date. Here was an opportunity for the approximately 5,000 workers to embark on a mission critical to the country and their own households.

Photo: Former Minister of Public Utilities Robert Le Hunte.

It is a chicken and egg argument to suggest that we cannot meter until we have an assured supply. The only way for our country to develop is for us to delink the politics from our development.  Here was an opportunity to change our mindset by changing the structures and systems around accessing water.

I am a firm believer that people will not change their behaviour unless they understand the pain or pleasure their actions will bring.

When Le Hunte joined the Cabinet, there was disquiet due to the apparent lack of knowledge about his Ghanian citizenship; but that quickly faded as he demonstrated comfort with his office. He even won over some citizens when he communicated a data-driven approach to reducing leaks in WASA’s pipeline infrastructure and demonstrated a willingness for respectful engagement via media appearances.

Fare thee well, former minister. Our politicians are just not ready to take the painful actions which will brighten our future!

Meanwhile I recall the words of both Dr Mighty Sparrow, renowned calypsonian, and Dr Terrence Farrell, former chairman of the Economic Development Advisory Board (EDAB): “We like it so!”

More from Wired868
Daly Bread: Who they fooling? Crime isn’t priority for PNM or UNC

A reader, who enjoys the historical perspective contained in many of these columns, asked me recently whether there is a Read more

Daly Bread: Violent crime retrospective; mamaguy from Gov’t and Opposition

In a column published 20 years ago, in mid-May 2003, I described the subject of crime as priority numbers one, Read more

Daly Bread: Stagnation reconfirmed, as T&T braces for Keith vs Kamla rematch

As was widely expected, the local government elections (LGE) resulted in a repeat of the control of the 14 local Read more

Noble: Democracy and the Vote—reviewing the 2023 Local Gov’t election

At the core of democracy is the vote. This single act is how we, the voters, signal how we feel Read more

Noble: Wait Dorothy, wait; meaningless talk blows our future away

This week saw the eruption of meaningless narratives that do not help us to become the best we can be. Read more

Dear Editor: Miracle Ex-Minister beats background check to land Trade job

Dear Former Minister Darryl Smith, Congratulations on your recent appointment as a commercial officer for the Ministry of Trade. Your appointment Read more

About Dennise Demming

Dennise Demming
Dennise Demming grew up in East Dry River, Port of Spain and has more than 30 years experience as a communication strategist, political commentator and event planner. She has 15 years experience lecturing business communications at UWI and is the co-licensee for TEDxPortofSpain. Dennise is a member of the HOPE political party.

Check Also

Daly Bread: Who they fooling? Crime isn’t priority for PNM or UNC

A reader, who enjoys the historical perspective contained in many of these columns, asked me …


  1. Anyone who believes that Mr Le Hunte’s resignation was based solely on a difference of policy belief, in my respectful view, is living in a fool’s paradise. All is aware of the need for metering, indeed there it is said you cannot fix what you cannot measure, this is true for water delivery as well. I had a recent discussion about metering with an experienced fellow Engineer and Quality Evangelist and we eagerly discussed all the spinoffs metering would bring to T&T in addition to the improvement of water delivery. Anyone tasked with fixing WASA would agree that metering is essential to getting closer to the goal of a more reliable water supply. It is precisely for this reason that I believe there is “more in the mortar than the pestle.” As I recently said to a friend of similar political persuasion, you mean to say “two hardback men could not sit and resolve their differences.” I say no more.

  2. Dr. Emily Dick-Forde

    Accepting the transformational nature of the former Minister’s proposal, the leader in him should have taken back his note and look for another way to influence his colleagues to advance this project. To lead transformation one must have courage and a hopeful disposition. One must also not take oneself too seriously nor take setbacks personally. You have to keep pressing forward with what you belief is best for the people and regardless of how long it takes, press in until it happens. I have seen and worked with a transformational leader. We are all enjoying much of what he persisted to bring to our nation. He never gave up until his time was up. Mr Le Hunte gave up on this much needed transformation way too easily. Why?

  3. And what?
    Look, this country has hundreds of people who could do the job that the minister was doing, and there are at least 50 people that could have done a better job. This nonsense that because he had such lavish plans, we lost something good is a puerile argument. The man could not maneuver the public sector, so he failed, and it is no one fault but his.
    And all this blah blah blah about WASA over the years by persons ignorant on the principles of public sector management is nonsensical and time wasting.
    The important public good – water, is manged in this country under a system that has its own legislation. And unfortunately the system is supervised by the politician who has a finite term in office. Fix that, and we on the way to fix the problem. Maybe a water czar type position may work, but restructuring a huge organizational like that takes time and dedication, and let’s be real, le Hunte had nether on his side

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.