Crowne: AG Al-Rawi curiously wrong in characterising ‘doxing Devant’

“Doxing, according to the AG, ‘is when you go out of your way to crash a system using certain truths’ which is ‘akin to a cybercrime’. With the greatest of respect, this is untrue. This is not what doxing is.

“[…] In fact both the Interim Report and Report of the Joint Select Committee on the Cybercrime Bill 2017—which the AG himself chaired—defined doxing as ‘the practice of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent’. Therefore it is even more surprising that the AG would define the term in such an odd manner.”

The following Letter to the Editor on Attorney General Faris Al-Rawi’s description of doxing—in reference to the behaviour of former UNC Senator Devant Maharaj—was submitted to Wired868 by barrister and attorney-at-law, Dr Emir Crowne:

Photo: Former UNC Senator Devant Maharaj.
(Copyright I95.5fm)

Devant Maharaj has come into the spotlight recently for releasing the otherwise private phone numbers of public officials. Once those numbers have been published, various public officials have reported being inundated with messages, death threats and salacious imagery.

Over the weekend the Honourable Attorney General indicated that Mr Maharaj was ‘doxing’. Doxing, according to the AG, “is when you go out of your way to crash a system using certain truths” which is “akin to a cybercrime.”

With the greatest of respect, this is untrue. This is not what doxing is.

Doxing is the use of the Internet to find and/or publish information about an individual. The information could be public, public but difficult to find, or private. Doxing can be malicious, or for benevolent purposes like social activism and news reporting.

In fact both the Interim Report and Report of the Joint Select Committee on the Cybercrime Bill 2017—which the AG himself chaired—defined doxing as “the practice of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.” Therefore it is even more surprising that the AG would define the term in such an odd manner.

The AG’s suggestion that doxing is “akin to a cybercrime.” That statement is also curious since both the Interim Report and the Report of the Joint Select Committee on the Cybercrime Bill 2017 were inconclusive on this point.

Photo: Attorney general Faris Al-Rawi.

Both reports simply noted stakeholder concern as to whether section 18 (1) of the Cybercrime Bill encompassed doxing would criminalise a “person who uses a computer system to communicate with the intention to cause harm to another person.”

To suggest that doxing is “akin to a cybercrime” despite such legislative ambiguity might be a worrying glimpse into the purported reach of the Government’s proposed cybercrime legislation.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Diversification, not the Dragon, is key for T&T’s economic survival—but here’s why it has eluded us

“[…] The Ministry of Finance website provides budget statements from 2002 onwards. Diversification is mentioned in each budget statement. All Read more

Dear Editor: How incompetence of T&TEC—and other essential services—impoverishes T&T

“[…] The frustration in Greenvale, however, runs deeper than a single Sunday blackout. The community already feels utterly abandoned. The Read more

Dear Editor: “Evidence-based decision-making” can transform T&T from “underachievers’ paradise”

“[…] Now, Trinidad and Tobago is a shadow of its former self, undermined by a lack of innovative leadership, perceived Read more

Dear Editor: Jack Warner’s extradition “freedom” is a mirage—ex-FIFA VP still can’t travel

“[…] At first glance, this might sound like the end of Jack Warner’s ordeal. If the court sets him free, Read more

Dear Editor: Congrats to Jack Warner—but what does his extradition success mean for T&T?

“[…] On 23 September, Justice Karen Reid ruled that the extradition process against him was flawed and has permanently stopped Read more

Dear Editor: Who is paying Roger Alexander’s legal bills? The public deserves transparency

“[…] When a sitting minister hires some of the most expensive lawyers in the country, the public has a right Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: Diversification, not the Dragon, is key for T&T’s economic survival—but here’s why it has eluded us

“[…] The Ministry of Finance website provides budget statements from 2002 onwards. Diversification is mentioned …

2 comments

  1. “To suggest that doxing is “akin to a cybercrime” despite such legislative ambiguity might be a worrying glimpse into the purported reach of the Government’s proposed cybercrime legislation.”

    …and, no less tellingly, into the workings of the mind of any person responsible for such a suggestion.

  2. Seems right on par with the sedition reference with respect to the same phone numbers leak. Even Senator Palpatine would blush at these developments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.