Home / View Point / Martin Daly / Zig Zag, Zika and severance: How our political system gets it wrong

Zig Zag, Zika and severance: How our political system gets it wrong

The currently very serious matters of Zika and the non-availability of severance pay have once again exposed our habit of rarely developing solutions to problems and limiting our energies to combative debate and protest, in the course of which officialdom invariably makes authoritarian pronouncements and tries to take unilateral action.

Photo: Mosquitos carrying the Zika virus are causing a global stir. (Copyright Abc.net.au)
Photo: Mosquitos carrying the Zika virus are causing a global stir.
(Copyright Abc.net.au)

As soon as the outside world discovered Zika, more about the disease and its consequences promptly became known. Had it remained an obscure disease confined to Third World countries, a lot less about it would have been known and the authorities could more freely dissemble about it—their preferred policy when confronted with difficult issues.

For many years, every time the country knew we had a mini-epidemic of dengue within our borders, the more the Ministry of Health would tell us that it was under control and attack the media for fuelling unwarranted concern.

Now that we are fully immersed in the information age, events can no longer be easily concealed or misrepresented—even by Third World authorities—because news travels fast across all borders.

Consequently, we knew early o’clock, that Zika was linked to microcephaly, which is the birth of babies with abnormally small heads and related complications if the mother had Zika while pregnant.

It was an inevitable question following the disclosure of the Zika consequences to ask whether abortion was an option available to pregnant mothers with Zika, given the likely outcome of their pregnancies.

Photo: Talking abortion... (Courtesy Huffington Post)
Photo: Talking abortion…
(Courtesy Huffington Post)

That question would become all the more pressing in a country like ours with an obscure abortion law, but one where abortions are practiced anyway with frequently disastrous consequences for those who cannot afford to slip in and slip out of a private doctor’s office.

There is obviously one practice for the rich and another practice, sometimes fatal, for the poor.

In this connection, there is talk of slip and fall wards in our hospitals, which treat an alleged fall of the pregnant person, to which heavy bleeding and the signs of the loss of a foetus are attributed.

Ours is in many ways a stagnant or unprogressive society, where sensitive issues like abortion cannot be discussed without the heavy intervention of authoritarian pronouncements and, as is common nowadays, the language of haters.

This is the context in which we must view the current Health Minister’s assertion—as the media pressed him about abortion, contemporaneously with the Zika outbreak—that the media’s motive was to raise “a topic convenient for the selling of news” and his obscurantist declaration that the discussion of abortion was closed.

Photo: Health Minister Terrence Deyalsingh.
Photo: Health Minister Terrence Deyalsingh.

The context I have described is not pleasant but it highlights the foolishness of the Minister’s assertion and the wisdom of the Prime Minister’s admonition of it.

Recent significant job losses have re-opened the wound of no guarantee of severance pay for affected employees.

In the 1980s there was fierce debate about amending the law to give severance pay some kind of priority in the winding up of a company. At that time, the battleground was clause 24—not 34—of a proposed piece of legislation to give severance pay priority similar to secured debts.

I served on a Cabinet appointed committee on the subject, which reported in June 1989. Unfortunately, I cannot find a copy of the report but the fact is that nothing was ever done or seriously considered apart from proposed amendments to company law, a course of action fraught with problems.

Had we pursued some form of severance fund or insurance at that time, employees would not be sucking salt in this new period of economic adjustment and Ministers would not have to be making hollow statements like “never again”.

Photo: An All Trinidad General Trade Workers Union protest. (Courtesy ATGTWU)
Photo: An All Trinidad General Trade Workers Union protest.
(Courtesy ATGTWU)

Legal deficiencies—whether in respect of abortion, severance pay, or, to mention another pressing problem, bail and some other aspects of criminal justice administration—not in the control of the Judiciary are the result of a poorly performing, zig zag legislature.

Our legislature has a dismal record of law reform. Parliament is little more than a gayelle where political gamecocks unsheathe verbal spurs and swipe at each other.

In every debate, speeches and votes must slavishly follow the party line.  I do not recall any debate in which members were freed from the party whip and permitted to speak according to their consciences, for example, on abortion or on the now farcical death penalty.

Moreover, in this gayelle scenario, non-party aligned ideas are not really welcome despite the pretence of sometimes inviting them.

Any expression of view not adherent to a partisan political purpose is usually dismissed as political opposition and not seen as constructive comment.

Photo: Then Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar (left) shakes hands with her successor, Dr Keith Rowley, en route to Nelson Mandela's funeral in South Africa. (Courtesy News.Gov.TT)
Photo: Then Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar (left) shakes hands with her successor, Dr Keith Rowley, en route to Nelson Mandela’s funeral in South Africa.
(Courtesy News.Gov.TT)

From A for Administration of justice to Z for Zika, the pursuit of power to gain or keep control of the huge spoils available to Governments trumps consensus building towards the goal of improving the lot of the average citizen.  We need to unite around issues and throw away blind loyalties.

 

AboutMartin Daly

Martin Daly
Martin G Daly SC is a prominent attorney-at-law. He is a former Independent Senator and past president of the Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago. He is chairman of the Pat Bishop Foundation, a board member of The Little Carib Theatre and Folkhouse and a steelpan music enthusiast.

Check Also

Daly Bread: Fake oil, true analysis; inside the belly of the State enterprise system

Fifteen years ago, shortly before becoming a columnist—as a guest speaker at an event organised …

13 comments

  1. ” I do not recall any debate in which members were freed from the party whip and permitted to speak according to their consciences…”

    Mr. Daly, in the PP’s ‘Run-off’ Bill of 2014, the said thing that you cannot recall happened. Persons debated on their own conscience and along Party lines.

    Prakash Ramadhar was stoutly opposed by Winston Dookeran and C. Seepersad-Bachan. Memebers of the PP voted against the then PM.

  2. Agreed! “Parliament is little more than a gayelle where political gamecocks unsheathe verbal spurs and swipe at each other”.

  3. People not getting their pensions for years after they retire is a much more serious issue than the severance pay.

  4. To shed a little bit more light on this complex medicolegal issue, I’ll leave this article right here. We wouldn’t want the legal system to get it wrong too:
    http://patient.info/doctor/termination-of-pregnancy

    • Earl Best

      At the moment, women have NO option, whether early or late in the pregnancy. My reading of the piece suggests that Martin is simply calling for them to be given AN option instead of adopting the MoH’s antediluvian position that there are NO circumstances that can justify an abortion. In fact, as far as Deyalsingh is concerned, there is to be no further discussion of the issue. The authoritarian ass!

    • I think Mr Daly is the victim of consuming the bad reporting from the mainstream media. When the Min of Health spoke at the Zika conference held earlier this year, he did say that abortions were illegal in this country. But he went on to say that by the time microcephaly is diagnosed, the pregnancy is too far advanced to terminate. Basically you’d be delivering a premature baby and then trying to kill it. I think that’s the part goes over most lay people’s heads. So if Mr Daly is instead proposing that Zika-infected pregnant females be offered termination early on in the pregnancy when we simply do not have enough data to describe how many of these pregnancies result in microcephalic babies is a dangerous, and quite frankly, an unethical, standpoint to take.

    • Well, many times columnists–myself included–are offering opinions on things outside our specialist area. And we are depending on the information that is most readily accessible to steer us in the right direction.
      The risk will be that we are steered wrong.

    • Well let’s hear from the OB-GYNs, the MFMs (maternal-fetal medicine), the virologists. Remember the Ebola mass-hysteria days?

    • I’m sorry Mr Best feels that way. Regardless of one’s opinion on abortion, the Minister of Health did not make up our country’s abortion laws.

  5. Dear Mr Daly,
    Microcephaly is detected on ultrasound as early as late 2nd trimester or early 3rd trimester. Are you suggesting that pregnant women infected with Zika in the last 3 months of their pregnancy be offered the option of termination if microcephaly is detected on ultrasound? Or are you suggesting that all pregnant females infected with Zika be offered the option of termination early in pregnancy when it is too early to tell if the fetus will develop microcephaly at all?