MATT “disappointed” with Defamation and Libel Act


The Media Association of Trinidad and Tobago (MATT) is disappointed that the amendments to the Defamation and Libel Act 2013 that excluded the repeal of Section 8 of the Act have been passed in the Senate.

Section 8 of the Act, which states, “If any person maliciously publishes any defamatory libel, knowing the same to be false, he is liable on conviction to imprisonment for two years and to pay such fine as the court directs” has not been repealed.

Sections 9, which has been repealed, states, “If any person maliciously publishes any defamatory libel, upon conviction thereof he is liable to pay a fine and to imprisonment for one year.”

Photo: Attorney General Anand Ramlogan. (Courtesy T&T Mirror)
Photo: Attorney General Anand Ramlogan.
(Courtesy T&T Mirror)

MATT is of the view that the passage of these amendments without the repeal of Section 8 has the potential to limit press freedom, as journalists will still face the threat of imprisonment.

This is counterintuitive to the government’s claim that it intends to decriminalise defamation and libel. The population has recourse through the civil courts if they feel their reputation has been besmirched.

By allowing Section 8 to remain as part of this country’s laws, there is no way one can believe the intent to decriminalise defamation and libel is serious.

MATT is of the view that this is in contravention to the fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution of Trinidad and Tobago in Chapter 1:4(k), which ensures freedom of the press.

Photo: The new MATT executive committee (top row; left to right): Akash Samaroo, Khamal Georges, Curtis Williams, Jabari Fraser. (Bottom row left to right) Omatie Lyder and Carla Bridglal. Missing is Richard Charan.
Photo: The new MATT executive committee (top row; left to right): Akash Samaroo, Khamal Georges, Curtis Williams, Jabari Fraser.
(Bottom row left to right) Omatie Lyder and Carla Bridglal.
Missing is Richard Charan.

MATT has been keenly following the debate on defamation and libel, and requests law makers to reconsider its current position. The Act needs to be amended, and Section 8 repealed.

If lawmakers are genuine, given that their mission of ensuring press freedom remains an inviolable right of the people of Trinidad and Tobago, they will remove this restrictive legislation, ensuring that journalists continue to enjoy the liberty and autonomy to make responsible decisions to the benefit of our society without the fear of imprisonment.

More from Wired868
Noble: What’s going on, with open season on Office of the DPP?

These days I feel like Marvin Gaye, the singer of the 1971 Billboard hit “What’s going on?” Confronted by the Read more

Noble: When will we hold accountable those “honourable” members who lead?

“When a crime is not punished quickly, people feel it is safe to do wrong.” Ecclesiastes 8: 11 Last week’s Read more

Noble: Considering the PDP’s collapse, the PNM Convention’s shuffle, and Volney’s passing

What a week! The events that tumbled over each other added to the exhaustion and frustration of the long road Read more

Noble: Money! Money! Money! How our descent into corruption got normalised

“I would like to be able to love my country, fully loving justice. I don’t want just any greatness for Read more

Dear Editor: Martin Daly SC should explain finer points of Vincent Nelson’s indemnity deal

“[…] I would also like Mr [Martin] Daly SC to explain, in his column, why he thinks that the DPP Read more

Dear Editor: Nelson legal quagmire started with Al-Rawi’s procedural error

“[…] The Vincent Nelson situation was not an intricate, and perplexing state of affairs nor was it complicated or difficult. From Read more

About MATT Executive

The Media Association of Trinidad and Tobago is the authorised representative body for local journalists in all formats.

Check Also

Noble: What’s going on, with open season on Office of the DPP?

These days I feel like Marvin Gaye, the singer of the 1971 Billboard hit “What’s …

One comment

  1. I personally do not see a problem with a journalist being penalised for knowingly printing a false story. That strikes at the very heart of journalism.
    My suggestion for an amendment is stronger penalties for persons who sue knowing that the journalist is right. Why not have the bully also spend time in jail?
    I will happily trumpet the cause of jail for malicious journalists if there is also the surety of jail for financial bullies as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.