Daly Bread: A time to stand firm—Independent senators must stay true to conscience

I have re-examined the long-standing perils of our manipulable state enterprise system, focusing last week on how inadequately prepared we are for oversight in terms of appropriately trained personnel and available or reliable data.

This week I wish to emphasise that it was into that same manipulable environment that the recently defeated People’s National Movement (PNM) government placed the Trinidad and Tobago Revenue Authority (the TTRA).

The Dr Eric Williams Financial Complex.

The TTRA was to be the rock star of revenue collection. However, it was never clear to me how this new statutory body would have performed competently if its staff was to be drawn from personnel of the type whose limitations were adversely described by the Procurement Regulator as quoted in last week’s column.

Proponents of the TTRA did not realistically face the peril of its possible manipulation, state enterprise-style.

I am aware that in September 2024 the Privy Council held that it was “satisfied that there are the necessary mechanisms and effective safeguards to protect the staff and officers of the Authority and members of the public from executive interference”.

Central Bank governor Dr Alvin Hilaire was fired on 24 June 2025 at the request of Cabinet, which is led by Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar.

I respect that finding. But in this society there is a long-standing practice of interference behind the legal veneer of protection. I have described this as interfering intravenously.

Moreover, if governors of the Central Bank, two in succession, can be dismissed—one by red Cabinet advice, the other by yellow Cabinet advice—where would that have left any chairman of the TTRA, if not on the same precarious perch?

I remain unconvinced therefore that in the real world the TTRA would not have been in peril of manipulation similar to bodies controlled by the party in power through a state board, as outlined in my previous columns.

(From left) Minister of Public Utilities and Minister in the Office of the Prime Minister Barry Padarath, Minister of Finance Dave Tancoo and Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar.
Copyright: Office of Parliament 2025.

Consequently, I do not mourn the demise of the TTRA as a result of the repeal of the legislation establishing it.

Just as one feared manipulation of the TTRA, one can also fear—as the Independent senators appear to have done—for partisan political manipulation of the Children’s Life Fund, when the current Government insisted on the Minister of Health having the authority to review applications rejected by the Life Fund Committee.

The nine Independent senators found themselves and their good faith under attack arising out of how they voted on proposed amendments to the Children’s Life Fund when the amending Bill was in its Committee stage, even though they ultimately supported the passing of the Bill.

UNC Senator Phillip Alexander (left) has a word with Independent Senator Paul Richards.
Photo: Office of the Parliament 2025.

We live in an environment in which, on many occasions, all that seems to matter is taking a position for or against and then to light the electronic media fire and hate on persons with whom there is disagreement.

Note must be taken that the fierce momentum of hate of that kind may even lead to physical attacks on figures in public life or public spotlight.

Such a negative environment discourages examination of underlying factors, encourages blind loyalty to shaky messiahs and promotes quick fixes. It also leads to the repeated dashing of hopes when quick fixes or unsound promises fail to yield results.

Independent Senator Deoroop Teemal.
Photo: Office of the Parliament 2025.

The nine Independent senators have been thrust into the negative environment I have described. They can take care of themselves and the President of the Senate came out promptly with a statement for their protection after the Children’s Life Fund debate.

It must however be recorded that the premature attacks on them as conspirators against the elected Government were blown away by their subsequent participation in the debate on the Prime Minister’s Pension (Amendment) Bill in the Senate last week.

Each of the nine senators carefully and respectfully set out their individual reasons for the stance each was taking on the Bill, five of them ultimately supporting the Bill and voting with the Government. In some cases, the conscientious internal conflict in coming to a final position was obvious.

Independent Senator Courtney McNish.
Copyright: Office of the Parliament 2025.

However they voted, it was a commendable execution of their duty and makes them worthy of our trust and confidence, albeit at this early stage of their onerous public service.

As the pressure is ramped up on them, hopefully they will not be intimidated into shirking their duty as each one of them sees it. It is a time to stand firm.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Is Cepep programme in crisis? Or is this an opportunity for reform?

“[…] Cepep was designed as a springboard—a transitional system for those facing barriers to employment, a way to build dignity Read more

Noble: Does visit of divisive Modi align with ‘every creed and race find an equal place’?

As Trinbagonians, we have an aspiration expressed in the phrase ‘all ah we is one family’. Lord Nelson, as a Read more

Dear Editor: Why is accountability only demanded of ‘the other side’?

“[…] What kind of society are we building when the working class is always the first to feel the axe? Read more

Daly Bread: The problem with governments’ management of state boards

Integrity, accountability, financial prudence and consequence management are not simply partisan political issues. They relate to the socio-economic health and Read more

Noble: Beware of frenemies—why Labour should be wary of Gov’t union

It is usual for all attention to be put on Tubal Uriah Butler on Labour Day. This year, however, my Read more

MSJ: T&T Labour movement can breathe after Rowley’s relentless attacks

“[…] The 10 years under the Dr Keith Rowley-led PNM saw a vicious attack on the trade union movement and Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: Is Cepep programme in crisis? Or is this an opportunity for reform?

“[…] Cepep was designed as a springboard—a transitional system for those facing barriers to employment, …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.