Dear Editor: Misuse of safeguarding mechanisms can stain coach’s career


“[…] As previously mentioned, the goal of Fifa’s safeguarding efforts is to create an environment that includes preventative measures, educational initiatives, and clear response protocols.

“Unfortunately, when these policies are misused or weaponized by disgruntled individuals, they can have serious negative consequences. For example, false allegations made by individuals can exploit safeguarding mechanisms to make unfounded claims against coaches, damaging their professional credibility…”

The following Letter to the Editor on the potential harm of misuse of safeguarding policies was submitted to Wired868 by Brendon, a football fan:

A Fifa safeguarding poster.

The role of a youth football coach is one of dedication, mentorship, and fostering a love for the sport among young athletes. However, the actions of a disgruntled parent can have far-reaching consequences on a coach’s livelihood, reputation, and career.

This [letter] examines, the misuse of safeguarding principles, and the broader implications they it can have on sports culture.

While there is universal agreement that coaches and all involved in youth football must prioritize providing a safe environment for players, recent examples demonstrate the extreme lengths to which parental dissatisfaction can escalate—leading to accusations that cause both physical and emotional harm.

Trinidad and Tobago coach Shawn Cooper gestures from the sidelines during a u-15 international friendly action against Jamaica at the Mannie Ramjohn Stadium on 25 July 2023.
Photo: Daniel Prentice/ Wired868.

Fifa’s safeguarding initiative was designed to be comprehensive, with a focus on prevention, education, and response protocols. This proactive, holistic approach aims to create a culture of safety and awareness across the football ecosystem.

It is intended to prevent harm before it occurs and to build capacity at all levels of the sport.

However, the idea that Fifa’s safeguarding policies are primarily meant to “screen the people coming into football and remove those found guilty of abuse” is a narrow and injudicious interpretation. This understanding fails to recognize the broader purpose of Fifa’s safeguarding approach, which is not solely focused on individual wrongdoers but on systemic prevention.

As previously mentioned, the goal of Fifa’s safeguarding efforts is to create an environment that includes preventative measures, educational initiatives, and clear response protocols.

Children at play.
(via FA.)

Unfortunately, when these policies are misused or weaponized by disgruntled individuals, they can have serious negative consequences. For example, false allegations made by individuals can exploit safeguarding mechanisms to make unfounded claims against coaches, damaging their professional credibility.

Even unsubstantiated accusations can lead to public suspicion, eroding trust in a coach’s character and resulting in reputational harm.

The consequences for coaches can be severe, with allegations often leading to lengthy investigations, suspensions, or even termination of employment.

TTFA Safeguarding manager and ex-National Elite Youth Programme coordinator Gary St Rose.

While safeguarding is essential for the welfare of athletes, its misuse undermines its very purpose and creates unnecessary conflicts within the sporting community. Any misuse can discourage individuals from volunteering for coaching or other roles within the sporting world and contribute to a toxic environment that escalates tensions among coaches, parents, and athletes.

Ultimately, it erodes trust within the entire sports ecosystem.

To mitigate these challenges, sports organizations should take proactive steps. Providing training for ALL involved on appropriate behaviour and conflict resolution, establishing clear and transparent reporting mechanisms to handle complaints, and offering legal and emotional support to coaches facing allegations are key strategies.

Trinidad and Tobago technical director Anton Corneal (right) greets Men’s National U-20 head coach Brian Haynes (third from right) after a friendly international against Jamaica at UTT Campus, O’Meara on 25 January 2024.
National Under-17 head coach Shawn Cooper is third from left (hand on waist).
Photo: Daniel Prentice/ Wired868.

Furthermore, fostering open communication between parents and coaches is essential to building mutual respect and understanding.

In conclusion, the actions of a single disgruntled individual can have an irreparable impact on a coach’s career and reputation while undermining the integrity of youth sports. Addressing this issue requires a collective effort to balance safeguarding with fairness and accountability.

By promoting respect and understanding within sports communities, we can help ensure a safer environment for everyone involved.

Editor’s Note: The TTFA announced the appointment of 21 safeguarding officers on 30 March 2025.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: A full stadium in a half-broken country; what T&T game meant to poor families

“[…] Far less visible [than the upper tier citizens at yesterday’s World Cup qualifying match], was a single, unemployed mother Read more

Sealy gets debut double, as T&T trounce St Kitts and Nevis 6-2 before sell-out crowd

A double from debutante Dante Sealy, a goal on return from Levi Garcia and another from veteran Kevin Molino, and Read more

Dear Editor: Caribbean FAs, like TTFA, can never get sustained success from Fifa grants

“[…] Dependency on global and regional football authorities, and government funds disempowers football leaders in these associations. Leaders often find Read more

Dear Editor: T&T owes it to our talented youth to rebuild our football programme

“[…] As coach Dwight Yorke noted following the Unity Cup, many of our local-based players are not yet ready for Read more

Dear Editor: Mulraine is right; TTFA must invest in talent identification

“[…] Instead of relying on one-off screening sessions, the TTFA should establish a structured scouting network that monitors players across Read more

Mulraine: Screening sessions to select national youth teams is lazy, inefficient and outdated

“[…] Anyone who has gone through this process knows the folly of trying to select the ‘best’ 20 players out Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: “I hate my own child… when he turns 18, I’m done!”

“[…] I have tried everything: therapy, school intervention, parenting strategies from every corner of the …

3 comments

  1. Philip Ayoung-Chee, Trinidad and Tobago

    Thus all disgruntled parents will lodge complaints.

  2. FIFA’s Safeguarding program has a primary goal: to protect minors who are actively participating in sport. It’s crucial that we never lose sight of this key focus. While it’s true that there’s a risk of the program being weaponized by individuals or groups with personal agendas, and if we dig deep enough, we may uncover cases where this has happened, the priority must remain on safeguarding the well-being of the athletes.

    We must ensure that we avoid situations like the one with Dr. Nassar and women’s gymnastics, where child abuse went unchecked for over two decades. In many sporting environments, the emphasis on performance often outweighs protection, and the pursuit of medals can overshadow morals. As a result, some may choose to remain silent or dismiss concerns as untrue.

    To avoid these outcomes, it’s essential that we find capable and competent administrators to manage these safeguarding programs—individuals who can properly distinguish between false and legitimate claims, ensuring that the safety of minors remains the ultimate priority.

  3. Mr Richard Blackett

    While I can find nothing to quibble about, the sentiments while commendable are so vague that the reader remains uninformed about who is responsible for violating the safeguarding mechanism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.