Dear Editor: PNM will lose moral authority—and elections—if it implements SRC recommendations

“[…] The Cabinet has adopted the same arguments advanced by trade unionists in support of their claims for hefty increases in the remuneration packages of their members.

“The SRC surveyed the local, regional and international environment and discovered that the remuneration packages of those under its purview were wholly inadequate by comparison. However, the same can be said regarding the other public sector employees who are represented by trade unions…”

The following Letter to the Editor on the Government’s acceptance of proposed salary increases was submitted to Wired868 by Louis Williams of St Augustine:

(From left) Attorney general Reginald Armour SC, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley and Minister of Energy and Energy Industries Stuart Young SC.
Photo: Office of the Parliament 2024

I do not understand how intelligent men and women could sit in Cabinet and take such a wholly irrational decision to accept and implement the recommendations of the SRC. What absurdity!

The Cabinet is behaving just like some of our irresponsible and anachronistic trade unionists. The Cabinet has adopted the same arguments advanced by trade unionists in support of their claims for hefty increases in the remuneration packages of their members.

The SRC surveyed the local, regional and international environment and discovered that the remuneration packages of those under its purview were wholly inadequate by comparison.

Photo: A trade union protest.
(Copyright OWTU)

However, the same can be said regarding the other public sector employees who are represented by trade unions. For instance, comparative work in the local private sector would attract, often enough, twice what is paid in the Public Service.

The problem is that given our country’s current economic and financial situation, the country cannot afford to match what is paid elsewhere for similar work or work of equal value.

The Finance Minister, quite correctly, has been consistently asking for restraint by the trade unionists given our current financial and economic predicament. Four percent (4%) has been the consistent offer.

The Government has now lost the moral authority to seek restraint from the trade unionists.

(From second to left to right) Ministers Symon de Nobriga, Faris Al Rawi, Dr Keith Rowley and Colm Imbert open the Diego Martin Administrative Complex on 10 June 2023.
Photo: Office of the Prime Minister

Quite frankly, the ordinary worker has a greater claim for a more substantial increase. Many such persons are having difficulty providing their basic needs such as food, clothing and shelter. The same cannot be said for those who fall under the purview of the SRC.

The Cabinet must set the right example. Its membership must demonstrate astute leadership and accept no more than the 4% that it is asking the working class to accept.

The PNM party groups and its general council must agitate for a reversal of this horrendous decision. The PNM cannot win the next general elections if the SRC recommendations are implemented.

Photo: Trinidad nurses protest for improved conditions.

The Cabinet has demonstrated that it is totally out of touch with the reality on the ground. That decision is a total disrespect to the general populace.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Indarsingh’s appointment as Industrial Court judge should spark national concern

“[…] The Industrial Court wields quasi-constitutional powers in employment matters. It issues binding decisions affecting the rights of workers, unions, and employers. Read more

Dear Editor: It’s disturbing that PM cheers on US claim of extrajudicial killing

“[…] The fact that our Prime Minister would openly applaud extrajudicial killings as a solution to drug trafficking was troubling to Read more

Dear Editor: Jury duty in T&T feels like the apex of indignity

“[…] The morning began with a scene of casual dehumanisation. We were herded like livestock into the entrance of the Read more

Noble: Nation-building musings—is T&T under construction or destruction?

“On August 31, 1962, a country will be free, a miniature state will be established, but a society and a Read more

Dear Editor: T&T’s political parties are uninspiring; but here is how to change that…

“[…] Madam Prime Minister 2.0 I suggest the development of an Innovation/Creative fund to encourage our students to promote math, Read more

Dear Editor: T&T’s reckless unilateral stance on US-Venezuela standoff is a betrayal of Caricom

“[…] The Government’s position, as expounded by the Prime Minister and the Foreign Affairs Minister, is not neutrality by any Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: Indarsingh’s appointment as Industrial Court judge should spark national concern

“[…] The Industrial Court wields quasi-constitutional powers in employment matters. It issues binding decisions affecting the rights …

2 comments

  1. I think you might find the following a useful exercise.
    Taking the answer to the last question to be yes, ask yourself this important question: what should we as a country do about it?
    And then follow through with the questions that naturally follow.

  2. We are witnessing a level of ignorance that is stunning to say the least. Is this what they call Harikari? Who are their advisors, are they that tone deaf to what is going on in this country?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.