Dear Editor: T&T Coat of Arms should not be business of any one political party

“[…] It is my view therefore that a decision to alter the Coat of Arms should not have been made by the political directorate at its party convention taking into account the implications for such a change, which is not the responsibility of any political party, but a responsibility of the state.

“[..] Could one element or image be removed without altering the intent and meaning of the original design as was approved by the College of Arms? […]”

The following Letter to the Editor on Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley’s proposed change to the Trinidad and Tobago Coat of Arms was submitted to Wired868 by Bryan St Louis of Bassa Hill, La Brea:

The coat of arms is an official emblem, mark of identification, symbol of the authority of the government of a nation or state. In effect it is really the seal of state of the government and arguably the most important of the national emblems and it is located at the top of all government documents.

It is my view therefore that a decision to alter the Coat of Arms should not have been made by the political directorate at its party convention taking into account the implications for such a change, which is not the responsibility of any political party, but a responsibility of the state.

So, what is the history behind the design of the existing Coat of Arms?

The Coat of Arms of Trinidad and Tobago was designed by a committee formed in 1962 to select the symbols that would be representative of the people of Trinidad and Tobago. The committee included noted artist, the late Carlyle Chang and Carnival designer, the late George Bailey.

The Coat of Arms with the accompanying motifs—which represent indigenous features of Trinidad and Tobago—were selected and formally agreed to be used as the Coat of Arms of Trinidad and Tobago in 1962, in a design approved by the College of Arms.

So, could one element or image be removed without altering the intent and meaning of the original design as was approved by the College of Arms?

If after 62 years politicians now see the need to effect a change to one element because of the negative historical connection, then maybe we may have to consider if it is time for us to review the contents of every element or image on the Coat of Arms and come up with a new design going forward.

For instance, most Tobagonians see the Cocrico birds as noisy pests. Additionally, what were the other images intended to reflect?

A change in the design of the existing Coat of Arms should not only be about attempting to erase part of our history as it relates to the role played by Columbus and the colonisers.

It should be about creating and designing a new coat of arms which would reflect what we stand for as a cosmopolitan people of Trinidad and Tobago.

I may be wrong in my views but I suggest the need for a committee, as was done in 1962, to be formed to select the appropriate symbols. Those symbols would be a positive and progressive representation of the people of Trinidad and Tobago—keeping our history as Trinbagonians intact as well as reflecting our advances.

Nuff said! Let us begin a meaningful conversation on this development and other not so related issues.

More from Wired868

Dear Editor: All at SEA—changes needed in T&T’s education system

“[…] T&T’s education system thus faces two challenges—decades old, but now more pressing in the context of 21st century market Read more

Dear Editor: Know the ground you’re standing on—talking points on proposed home invasion bill

“[…] While the proponents of this proposed bill argue that these laws will promote self-defense and personal responsibility, critics have Read more

St Louis: Union leaders inside UNC-led gov’t must speak up—workers are watching

Elements of the trade union movement now sits inside the coalition that governs Trinidad and Tobago. That should have brought Read more

Dear Editor: None but ourselves can free our minds…

“[…] The psychological impact of long-term oppression can be devastating, leading to a cycle of poverty, social alienation, and continued Read more

Dear Editor: Gov’t must be wary of religious extremists to avoid repeat of 1990

“[…] The 1990 coup demonstrated that unchecked religious freedom and extreme religious ideologies can pose a direct threat to democracy Read more

Kamla: “The rule of law remains our strongest shield”—lessons from July 27

“[…] Let us be clear: the perpetrators of July 1990 were not patriots. The true patriots defended the Constitution and Read more

Letters to the Editor

Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com.
Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation.
We don’t publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.