Dear Editor: I support Kamla’s call for 25-year sentence for home invasions; and the PM should too

“[…] Please Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley, do not let this opportunity go to waste. Accept without hesitation the proposal of Mrs [Kamla] Persad-Bissessar at the minimum.

“[…] We are at war with the perpetrators of violent crimes. This is no time for partisan bickering. Drastic measures are required to defeat this common enemy…”

The following letter, which supports UNC political leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s call for a lengthy jail sentence for persons convicted of home invasions, was submitted to Wired868 by Louis W Williams of St Augustine:

A burglar attempts to break in to a home.

I wish to register my support for the proposal by the Leader of the Opposition, Mrs Kamla Persad-Bissesar, for a 25-year jail sentence for perpetrators convicted of home invasions.

In my view, although Mrs Persad-Bissessar did not state so, that sentence should be mandatory without the possibility of parole.

Prior to the announcement by Mrs Persad-Bissessar of her proposal, I had (in a letter to the editor first published on 17 April 2023) proposed a mandatory sentence of 20 years without the possibility of parole. I have no objection to the penalty being increased to 25 years.

As mentioned in my previous letter, I am of the view that much more severe penalties, much higher detection rates and, speedy trials/final determination of such matters would serve as an effective deterrent to such crimes. Also, as indicated in my earlier letter, only law enforcement officers should be allowed to legally possess firearms—anyone else convicted of possession of a firearm should receive a mandatory sentence of death.

An armed bandit calls his victim.

Therefore, if the perpetrator was in possession of a firearm at time that he committed the offence, whether or not he shot or killed a victim, he should receive the death sentence.

Please Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley, do not let this opportunity go to waste. Accept without hesitation the proposal of Mrs Persad-Bissessar at the minimum.

However, you may wish to request her support for even tougher legislation along the lines I have suggested, or otherwise.

I would like to suggest that you invite Mrs Persad-Bissessar and a small team to meet with you and your team to further discuss this matter and other legislative proposals for a much more robust criminal justice system.

Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley (left) and Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar SC at the funeral of late South Africa president Nelson Mandela.
Their political roles were reversed at the time.
(Copyright Power102fm)

I would like to suggest also that those discussions take place behind closed doors with no details being disclosed to the media prior to the conclusion of such discussions. Perhaps a suitable/competent mediator who is acceptable to both parties could be contracted to assist in this matter.

The parties must approach those deliberations with sincerity of purpose especially as, it is anticipated, the required new/amended legislation would have to be passed in Parliament with a Special Majority, which the Government does not possess.

In any event, the discussions on the legislative proposals regarding home invasions should be dealt with urgently. It could always be amended when the whole suite of criminal law legislation is finalised.

UNC political leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar.
(Copyright UNCTT)

We are at war with the perpetrators of violent crimes. This is no time for partisan bickering. Drastic measures are required to defeat this common enemy.

Pacifism/appeasement does not work as the world discovered in World War II. Such an approach only emboldens the enemy.

We must never forget how Adolph Hitler responded to the entreaties of the pacifist movement in the West, and to Neville Chamberlain—prior to concerted action being undertaken by Winston Churchill and FDR Roosevelt.

Our political leaders must dig deep and display the maturity and wisdom that we expect of them. The very lives of law-abiding citizens are at stake. The most fundamental human right is the right to life.

May God Bless Our Nation.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: T&T should be wary of ‘friendship’ with USA, and implications of Venezuela conflict

“[…] It is clear that this Administration, having outsourced its decision-making with respect to relations with Venezuela, has not learnt Read more

Daly Bread: Candy cane on spikes—fear meets festivities in T&T

A little over a week ago, on 29 November 2025, the Washington Post identified “the Caribbean allies helping the US Read more

Dear Editor: Home Invasion Bill is practical evolution of existing law—not ‘political comfort food’

“[…] Critics may dismiss the [Home Invasion] Bill as mere ‘political comfort food’.  Its purpose is practical: to bridge gaps Read more

Dear Editor: Why Home Invasion Act is legal equivalent of political comfort food

“[…] The Home Invasion Bill does not expand rights for householders. It does not reshape murder elements... What it does do is reassure Read more

What would calypsonians make of ‘Uncle Jack’, ‘Uncle Sam and Aunty Kam’?

October and Calypso History Month are behind us now. February and Season 2026 beckon. What lies ahead? What is in Read more

Daly Bread: Despite gov’t boasts, are states of emergency not mere pause buttons?

On 31 October 2025, Attorney General Senator John Jeremie SC gave the House of Representatives the Government’s rationale for an Read more

Check Also

Daly Bread: Performing arts disruptions—promoters will suffer without self-regulation

There have been recent announcements that will disrupt the output of the Carnival sector and …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.