Caricom denounces ‘acts of aggression’ by Venezuela against Guyana

The following is a statement from the Caribbean Community (Caricom) about the border controversy between Guyana and Venezuela. The territorial dispute, which dates back to an 1899 arbitration, is being heard by the International Court of Justice. The disputed area, west of the Essequibo River, is nearly two-thirds of modern-day Guayana and is rich in gold, diamonds and other natural resources. Venezuela’s claim also intersects oil and gas fields discovered by ExxonMobil.

Photo: Essequibo River, Guyana.

The Caribbean Community (Caricom) is deeply disappointed and concerned at the decree and subsequent statements by Venezuela with respect to that country’s border controversy with Guyana, including intimations of the creation of a strategic area of national development called Territory for the Development of the Atlantic Façade.

The Caribbean Community is in full support of the judicial process underway at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which is intended to bring a peaceful and definitive end to the long-standing controversy between the two countries.

Caricom reiterates in the strongest possible terms its firm and unswerving support for the maintenance and preservation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Guyana. Caricom firmly repudiates any acts of aggression by Venezuela against Guyana.

More from Wired868
Vaneisa: In search of the ideal world—is PM truly between a rock and a hard place?

A common pipeline fuelling the vitriol that is passing for discourse online has been the blatant racism and political partisanship Read more

Noble: Our leaders are writing bad cheques—T&T can only ignore reality for so long

This week, two quotes came to mind as I read the local newspapers. The first was from Benjamin Franklin, who Read more

Dr Harris: The economic cost of war—why T&T could lose big from US-Venezuela conflict

“[…] For neighbouring countries [of war sites], output falls by 10% on average after five years while inflation rises by Read more

Noble: Riding a tiger to catch a Dragon—has PM considered implications of inserting T&T into US-Venezuela conflict?

Our honourable Prime Minister, Mrs Kamla Persad-Bissessar, decided to mount a tiger to get access to the promised riches of Read more

Vaneisa: Fractured and foolish—will Caribbean leaders ever demonstrate spirit of CPL?

The late Austin Clarke published A Passage Back Home as a tribute to his friend, Samuel Selvon in 1994 (the Read more

Dear Editor: T&T’s reckless unilateral stance on US-Venezuela standoff is a betrayal of Caricom

“[…] The Government’s position, as expounded by the Prime Minister and the Foreign Affairs Minister, is not neutrality by any Read more

Check Also

Vaneisa: In search of the ideal world—is PM truly between a rock and a hard place?

A common pipeline fuelling the vitriol that is passing for discourse online has been the …

One comment

  1. These statements are all well and good. However, in treading a diplomatic line between maintaining working relations with Venezuela and supporting our Caricom neighbour, what actual steps are being implemented to protect Guyana from these continuing threats? How do we know whether Venezuela will abide by the ruling of the International Court of Justice? Its decrees to date do not evince or demonstrate that it will pay heed to the legal processes underway. Caricom needs to reach out to the international community and also to deal directly with Venezuela to back off.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.