PEA claims ignorance of reporter’s race before ‘half pint house negro’ slur, case heads to Tribunal

A case of racially-charged ‘offensive behaviour’ filed by TV6 journalist Kejan Haynes against then Progressive Empowerment Party (PEP) political leader Phillip Edward Alexander will be referred to a Tribunal for adjudication, after the Equal Opportunity Commission (EOC) rejected Alexander’s defence and a conciliatory meeting between the two parties failed to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion.

A report on the matter, which was lodged by Haynes on 2 July 2018 through attorney Dr Emir Crowne, was issued yesterday by the EOC panel of Lynette Seebaran-Suite (chairperson), Dr Beverly Ann-Marie Beckles (vice-chairperson), Dr Emanuel Hosein (commissioner), Eric Colin Cowie (commissioner) and James Chin Chuck (commissioner).

Photo: TV6 journalist and morning show host Kejan Haynes.

The Equal Opportunity Tribunal is mandated to ‘hear and adjudicate on unresolved complaints referred to it by the Commission’ and is described by the relevant Act as: ‘a superior court of record […] vested with all powers inherent in such a court, in addition to the jurisdiction and powers conferred on it by the Act’.

The complaint centres on a Facebook post made by Alexander, which referred to Haynes as: ‘[a] half pint house negro, bent over backwards to sell your brothers and sisters for a few pieces of silver and a pat on the head from Sabga’.

Alexander, described by the EOC as ‘a well-known social activist as well as an accomplished communications specialist’, ended his post with the words: ‘sit dog sit’.

When asked by the EOC to respond to Haynes’ assertion that the phrases were ‘utterly offensive, insulting and humiliating’ and to explain what he meant by ‘half pint house negro’, Alexander, through his legal representatives, said ‘the term was used in a colloquial manner and that [he] at the time of making such comment was oblivious as to the [Haynes’] race’.

Alexander claimed in his own defence that he did not know Haynes was of predominantly African heritage when he used a derogatory slur for people of his race, although the PEP leader had previously been interviewed by Haynes on the TV Morning Show.

Photo: Blogger and aspiring politician Phillip Edward Alexander.

“[Haynes] provided a print-out of a video-still that bore the date stamp 20th October 2016 which showed him interviewing [Alexander],” stated the EOC report. “Thus, the complainant finds it difficult to believe that the respondent was ignorant to the fact of his race, and stated that, unlike the other protected grounds under the EOA, race is not one that is easily concealable.”

Alexander, through his legal representatives, also maintained that his statements ‘were in no way intended to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate [Haynes] and was further not written on the basis of the complainant’s race, ethnicity and/or origin’.

By way of rebuttal, Haynes pointed to a second Facebook post by Alexander in which he stated: “I wanted to insult that son of a bitch and leave him insulted, [their emphasis] but failed to take into account that some others looking on might not understand the context or the circumstances and take it the wrong way…

“I continue to hold the original attacker and all who misuse public media for their own personal gain in contempt and want nothing to do with any of them at any time and no, this retraction is not for him or them, but for the wider population and my followers who do not deserve to become collateral damage in this war.”

Haynes suggested that, as a leader of a political party, Alexander’s words are ‘read across a wide cross-section of society’ and ‘have the potential to incite racial hatred’. He also asserted that the derogatory terms used by Alexander were ‘almost by definition intended to incite the population for one reason or another’.

Photo: Former PEP leader Phillip Edwards Alexander.

Alexander, for his part, said his statement were retaliation for perceived criticism of him and his supporter by Haynes. However, he insisted that his comment ‘was directed at [Haynes] alone and his intention was not to incite racial hatred’.

Alexander said he has not issued a public apology or retraction for his comments since, in his opinion, ‘the attack originated from the complainant’.

The matter, once Haynes agrees, will be heard next by the Equal Opportunity Tribunal. Click HERE to read full EOC report.

More from Wired868
Noble: The golden handcuffs—our love-hate relationship with Trinidad and Tobago

In 1958, the author, John Steinbeck, wrote an essay describing San Francisco as a city with “a golden handcuff with Read more

Dear Editor: Bassant should simplify investigative reports on Foster Cummings—for man-on-the-street

“[…] I am firmly of the view that no minister who has been or is involved in any shady financial and Read more

Media Monitor: Making amends for mystery of not calling SC’s name

As a part-time monitor of the media and a full-time anglophile, I sometimes come across stuff in the newspaper that Read more

Early Bird: When CNC3 “rolled” over the late Professor Gordon Rohlehr

Apoplectic, my fo’daymorning walk pardnah Bobby would later describe my state. In hindsight, I had to agree. Unapologetically apoplectic. Don’t Read more

Daly Bread: Buoyed by stale or tarnished Opposition, PNM is relentlessly insulting the public

A regular reader, who messages me occasionally, opened a WhatsApp exchange about last week’s Budget debate in the House of Read more

MATT offers condolences to families of Anthony Harris and Joel Nanton

“[…] Anthony Harris was a well-known and universally appreciated sports photographer who covered events with distinction across more than three Read more

About Editor

Check Also

Noble: The golden handcuffs—our love-hate relationship with Trinidad and Tobago

In 1958, the author, John Steinbeck, wrote an essay describing San Francisco as a city …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.