Dear Editor: Sanitation workers are leading the fight for environmental justice

“While we share one atmosphere, the rich can afford healthcare and land far away from landfills and the direct effects of environmental degradation. In the end, we may all be destroyed, but the poor will watch their children suffer first.”

The following Letter to the Editor on sanitation workers protests was submitted to Wired868 by Johannah-Rae Reyes:

Photo: Sanitation workers protest for better pay, health and safety.
(Photo courtesy Trinidad Guardian)

After initial protests in 2016 for better wages, healthcare and in defense of the environment, sanitation workers are back again, raising their fists in 2019. This most recent wave of demonstrations follows the breakdown in the negotiations in 2018 and sluggish movement by the government to erect structures, both physical and policy, to ensure the economically sustainable disposal and effective management of waste, and to protect their safety and health.

The Industrial General and Sanitation Workers Union (IGSWU) went beyond typical collective bargaining by advocating not just for better wages and their own health and safety, but also for the health and safety of communities surrounding these dumps, and for global environmental justice.

This call for better waste management comes the year after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released their doomsday reports, giving us now 11 years to reduce carbon emissions to prevent the atmosphere from becoming inhospitable to human life.

Landfills release CO2 and methane gas, greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change. As the climate crisis grows, small island developing states (SIDS) like ours are set to experience rising temperatures, rising sea surface temperatures, sea-level rise, coastal destruction, intense precipitation events and flooding.

Remember the “Great Floods of 2018”? You think WASA is incompetent now?

Photo: Flooding victims in Trinidad in 2018.

In an interview, Robert Benacia, president of the IGSWU, said the workers made several recommendations detailing how projects could be funded and be self-sustaining too. One idea was a tipping fee, to be paid by the companies depositing waste for disposal at the collection sites, based on the weight of the deposit.

“We did a proposal that would bring SWMCOL an additional $25m ($25–180m) a year depending on how they implement it. That could assist with the construction of engineered landfills, improving the working conditions for workers—our workers face most hazardous conditions in the country—and even the benefits in treating with the medical part of it.”

However, Benacia said that instead, a utility tax was suggested, “Why tax everybody, the population, when you have contractors in this country raking in millions, hundreds of millions of dollars and literally dumping for free.  . . . If they needed money to buy a boat or to find it for the police or to do anything else that is more important than sanitation workers and their life they will find it.”

Poor governance and widespread corruption are some of the obstacles in the way of progress, Benacia said.

“If it wasn’t for Ronald Roach [the plastic recycling programme] would have died a slow death because the pilot project, when it started under the People’s Partnership, ran out of funding. And Ronald Roach, seeing the importance to the country, keeping this recycling project running, juggled his limited resources and kept the recycling programme alive. Now it is a success, some feeders want to come too … and they have literally forced him out.”

Photo: Plastic waste at Beetham Landfill (Courtesy Johanna Reyes)

The dependency on friends of election hopefuls, who also happen to be manufacturers and contractors, has resulted in the government self-censoring when regulating industry. You will find the words “recognise”, “amend”, “encourage”, but not enough “urgent”, “implement”, “enforce”, “regulate”, “immediately” or “demand”. There is often no mention of timelines or deadlines, even though 2030 is about a decade away.

With few exceptions, like Section 2.13 on squatters and illegal use of state land, not much “urgent action” will take place. The recent National Environmental Policy 2018, while it included the polluter pays principle, did not mention seriously regulating industry and limiting the waste they produce or managing the environmental impact of their operations. I urge you to read it. Beautiful, but does very little.

Beetham Gardens residents live across the highway, north of the dump, in what is described as a “crime hotspot”. The community has been subject to militarised responses from the government and the national security services. A proportion of the daily-paid sanitation workers and the informal sector workers hail from the community.

Notably, they are in the environmental melee and are on the front lines developing elaborate strategies to deal with fires, fueling an informal sector for metal, cardboard and fabric recycling. They also assist with salvaging recyclables that would otherwise take up significant space under one of the layers of trash covered by building material, making honest livelihoods for themselves when nobody else would give them a decent chance.

Photo: Scavenger at Beetham landfill.
(Courtesy CNC3)

These workers, referred to as scavengers, receive no benefits yet face many risks. Meanwhile, their neighbourhood is surrounded by potential environmental hazards. To the south is the landfill that is said to improperly house materials and devices containing lethal substances, while to the east is the drain that the nearby Angostura factory has come under fire for indiscriminately dumping waste into.

But according to Benacia, the environmental threat from the landfill is not contained to Beetham Gardens alone.

“I have also seen instances where the dust coming off of the landfill is so thick. This is a regular occurrence for the workers who right in it every day for six-eight hours and they are covered with the dust from that landfill; that has to be hazardous to us. Then you have trucks driving through this stuff depositing it along the highways and every community that they go in depositing this. It goes on the truck as mud and dries to become dust wherever they deposit it and then when the wind is blowing any community along the roadway or any residential area, people inhale this dust and are directly impacted. It is a national crisis. That needs to be rectified or addressed.”

The gap between “the haves” and “the have nots” is broadening as those with power wish to hold on to all the power and accumulate what they can from a decreasing pool of wealth. They are ready and willing to sell out whoever they must to make sure they live in luxury. While we share one atmosphere, the rich can afford healthcare and land far away from landfills and the direct effects of environmental degradation. In the end, we may all be destroyed, but the poor will watch their children suffer first.

Photo: An artistic interpretation of global warming.

The elites are selling out the future of our children, their right to clean air, land to live on and grow food, and clean water to drink. But we, the people, are also harming ourselves and each other. Some of us do not wash our plastics properly before we send it to these workers to sort, or we just don’t bother to sort our trash at all. This means single working mothers are pulling fermented diapers from recyclables. These are some of the lighter hostilities.

When we support the invasion and imposition on their communities and brand them all as criminals, we hurt the same workers who are on the front lines, defending themselves, us and this piece of earth we occupy. They are the dump workers, the plastic dump workers on Recycling Avenue, the scavengers, the people we refuse to recognise as having equal rights in this country.

The IGSWU is taking collective bargaining where it needs to go, fighting to affect the holistic changes in all sectors that Caribbean SIDS need in the post-colonial era.

More from Wired868
Noble: Building or destroying our heritage; how T&T is shaped by its environment

In a Field Guide to Getting Lost (2005), Rebecca Solnit wrote of the places in which one’s life is lived: Read more

Vaneisa: Operation of municipal corporations as important as crime plan

Little things add up. Irritants that are not, of themselves, enough to make you feel besieged. Combined and constant, they Read more

Vaneisa: A city of clay—how would you reimagine Trinidad and Tobago?

Imagine that you could have every single thing your heart desires. No restrictions. Do you think you could envisage it Read more

Vaneisa: Loads of rubbish—what do you do with your trash?

On Republic Day, some friends—mainly from the journalism world—reconnected at my home for lunch. It was a delightfully memorable afternoon, Read more

Vaneisa: Leading horses to water—do public education campaigns work?

“She have the flu,” he said, when I asked about his daughter, who sounded weak and listless on the phone. Read more

Noble: With all the wealth T&T generated, why were there only broken promises for Beetham?

“[…] The last government never did anything like this (the Clean-up and Beautify Trinidad campaign). This is a great opportunity Read more

Check Also

Noble: Building or destroying our heritage; how T&T is shaped by its environment

In a Field Guide to Getting Lost (2005), Rebecca Solnit wrote of the places in …

One comment

  1. I am heartened to see that the union for sanitation workers is ahead in the fight to protect our environment. And am very impressed to read that their focus is not simply on wage increases. It’s going to be a long struggle but everything is at stake. Giving up is not an option.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.