Wired868 Wired868 for smart sport news and opinion
“[…] Five male Presidents later, the next President of Trinidad and Tobago should be a woman. Such an appointment would be a significant indicator of gender equality and an expression of the democratic value of inclusion.
“We should widen the scope of persons to be considered and Trinidad and Tobago has no dearth of qualified women.”
The following media statement expressing a regional group’s desire to see the Republic elect a female President was submitted to Wired868 by CAFRA T&T (Caribbean Association for Feminist Research and Action):
As Trinidad and Tobago struggles with violence, crime, corruption, inequality and divisiveness, the next president must contribute to the building of togetherness, respect, security and equality for all.
The president should have an ethical vision and a profound understanding of the history of this country, of its contemporary political and socio-cultural dynamics.
The selection of the next president therefore should be informed by public discussion. And the public should be encouraged to think not only of the people to be nominated but the values which are to be advanced.
As head of state, the president personifies the face of Trinidad and Tobago and is a symbol of the values of decency, unity, diversity, respect, thoughtfulness and public spiritedness.
Names of distinguished persons have already been suggested. But five male presidents later, the next president of Trinidad and Tobago should be a woman. Such an appointment would be a significant indicator of gender equality and an expression of the democratic value of inclusion.
We should widen the scope of persons to be considered and Trinidad and Tobago has no dearth of qualified women. There are as many women as men fit and qualified. These can include:
- Bridget Brereton, author and Professor Emerita of History, The UWI
- Judith Jones, Justice of Appeal
- Asha Kambon, researcher and public policy expert
- Christine Kangaloo, attorney-at-law and President of the Senate
- Sunity Maharaj, writer and former editor-in-chief of the Trinidad Express
- Rhonda Maingot, founder, Living Waters Community
- Dr Eastlyn McKenzie, educator, former Independent Senator
- Maureen Rajnauth-Lee, judge, Caribbean Court of Justice
- Rhoda Reddock, professor, social scientist and former deputy principal, The UWI
(Copyright Ansa McAL)
And no doubt, we can all add names to this list. So let us do just that.
The appointment of a woman will send a powerful signal to everyone, but particularly the youth, that leadership has a diverse face. Five presidents later, it would appear that the political parties of Trinidad and Tobago are considering only men. It is time for this thinking to end.
In the late 1990s, in response to one of my weekly columns, retired Professor Emeritus Desmond Imbert called me. It Read more
If you had a leak at your home, what would you do? Will you buy a mop and then a Read more
From the onset I wish to indicate that I hold no brief for either the outgoing office holder or the Read more
Last week, the incumbent Prime Minister, Dr Keith Rowley, pronounced that The University of the West Indies (The UWI) has Read more
“[…] The T&T constitution is defective in one important respect. Too much power of nomination and appointment resides in the Read more
When a public official who has undoubted legal power exercises that power, a question of the legitimacy of the exercise Read more
We will have gender equity.
You know there is a thing called stature.
And a reason for the colloquial of crapo, and putting any one in a tie (or dress)
As I reflect on our selection record for all things leadership
Thank you!!! Rose-Marie.
I not going to undermine my comment by calling the women quenks
But let someone tell me how they are qualified to lead, and apply the constitution,; and most of all, to give direction to the nation for constitutional reform.
Or even that how their work legitimizes them to the post, abd when you do the latter, I will show all the ways in which there are gaps that exist from what they do and the presidency.
Love what CoreyGilkes says: let’s examine people to posts now. No more free pass just cause an illiterate nonthinking population knows your name.
And I never give suggestions without solutions.
I offer to write and execute these exams
Offer accepted. Do you have the relevant Wired868 email addresses or do you need me to send them to you?
Offer accepted. Do you have the relevant Wired868 email addresses or do you need me to send them to you?
They want a next woman be byass sss as the the speaker of the house of rep
Whomever they decide to put please let him/her know the powers he/she has and the powers he/she doesn’t have
I would like to nominate Dr. Eastlyn Mackenzie for ‘Madam President’.
The way this country is going they could pick any woman and call the spouse the first man senseless
Gender should not be a factor. The Presidency should be decided by the people, not an electoral college in order to prevent political biases.
But society is politically biased. Just choose the next person won’t make any difference
Agreed. Only add Maven Huggins to that list.
Crouch !!!
You make me laugh. You make me love. Your support is unwavering.
But the comment on the church thread I just wrote relates to this discussion
How we should realize that in Trinidad, we have always selected leaders and leadership that/ who Constrain not Advance Development and Transformation.
Sorry for the suggestion, but do I see any of those women as aspirational, inspirational, want to be in their league?
Umh…
My response to this is no different to when I wrote this rambling rant on the eve of KPB being elected Prime Minister in 2010. The issue of a woman anything is irrelevant as far as I am concerned if the system she presides over remains influenced by patriarchal or masculinist ideas of leadership, progress and development. We are looking down the barrel of a major economic meltdown not to mention issues arising from climate change and some of the cultural traditions from indigenous societies hold the key to getting through what may be lying ahead. We need to start examining them (though not in the same way the West is cleverly doing exactly that while at the same time destabilising the various regions)
http://www.trinicenter.com/Gilkes/2010/0203.htm
The bigger lesson all over the world is that women are just and more patriarchal than the men, cause where these men come out from? A lab? An egg? (Women Mothers as the first teachers?)
We have such monumental public female leader failures. The last of which is Aung San Sui Kyi
And if you don’t know who she is, what her claim to fame was, what she ended up doing, and how she is a cosmic failure, Without looking it up, you my dear, are not fit nor equipped for this conversation.
Which gets to my other point.
We are a population totally ignorant to standards, requirements, knowledge and capacity to the roles we fill with the quenks; such is the result. Every time
In our quest for equality, it is important that we do not reward party loyalists. A woman can bring to the position a whole new dynamic and interesting perspectives. What do we have to lose in appointing a woman? Nothing if she is carefully selected
But we don’t even “carefully select” peas for market, Basdai Premchandsingh
Well, isn’t that the problem!
Totally agree !!!
The office of the president should be dissolved.
Reason being, why continue to pay someone maintain an office/family for ceremonial purposes. All that money can be better used towards education.
A President with no political influence or power.
You’re making too much sense oui…
True just getting pay and doing noting
..A vestige of our sordid colonial past..
I agree. And rather than look at race, religion or gender as a criteria for position, shouldnt we look for capability?
Fully agree
Allyuh forget about gender equality, we want someone who is fit for the job and impartial and who can succeed their predecessors that’s all, don’t choose a woman just because allyuh want to show the world allyuh doing something different. And if it is a woman chosen just remember, to which much is given , much is expected, just remember the moment you fail they would want to crucify you so tread carefully and remember your fellow women who are to follow in your footsteps!
It should be the most suitable person if it’s a woman fine but gender should not be a significant factor don’t put a female for female sake we did have the first female PM remember?
It will change the balance.
I am trying to remember
Glenda Morean?
I agree!
Why omit Gladys Gator is she not a lady
The PNM don’t want her
Lasana. I have no doubt there are many suitable female candidates. But I don’t agree with selection based on gender. So all I say quietly is 2010 – 2015.
I can’t hold Kamla against all women. Just like I won’t women to hold Anil Roberts (for example) against me. Lol.
Sure the best case is that race, gender, etc won’t matter. But I think it’s good that we consider if the current system is fair to everyone. And then how to make it more equal.
We … don’t … want … suitable … candidates, we want quenks, unqualified, corrupt, self serving, arrogant quenks.
The pattern cannot be denied!
I hear your views and I agree there is a gender gap. I just don’t think that electing a female president just for the sake of it will solve 56 years worth of issues .
Vernal, if Kamla has her way we will definitely have our first female quenk president with Gafoor… I agree it won’t solve all our problems Rowan. But it might still be a positive sign for equality. Of course, we don’t want Reshmi or Makeda. Lol. They both need to add to their CVs first.
What Lasana is saying is since we’re bound to appoint a quenk since that is our custom, we may as well go ahead and appoint a sow quenk so at least there will be gender equality in our quenkdom.
Right Lasana?
Lasana Liburd Kamla confirmed that she would like to nominate Gafoor?
Savitri not that I know of to be honest. No.
Oh thanks, thought I missed something
Savitri, I don’t think the UNC has distanced itself from the suggestion either. Kamla surely saw it. So it is in that grey area that politicians like so much.
Do you know one way or the other?
Not me nah..whoever they choose will be a quenk, as Vernal said..the whole country has lost all sense of right and wrong…conveniently
Rowan Bartolo, I would say 1962-1986..think about that
I’m with Vern. We could pontificate all we want. It’s not like we have an actual say in which type of quenk they pick. It sounds defeatist but the only say we have in this matter is whether we respect the dam quenk or not ?
Defeatist?
How many years have we been documenting the nonstop f^&%ry of our elected and appointed leaders on social media, what has doing so improved?
It is insane to keep doing the same thing and expect a different result.
The real reason why nothing will ever improve in T&T is that the citizenry is so divided that they cannot see their obvious common interests to save their lives, and even if they could see it they are too divided and lazy to get up from behind their electronic devices to do anything about it.
But hey … leh we keep posting!
Point taken Savitri Maharaj.
Lasana Liburd ” if the current system is fair to everyone. And then how to make it more equal.” Indeed, that is and should be the biggest (if not the only) issue.
I disagree.
Obviously the system is designed to abuse the taxpayer, therefore regardless the gender of appointed office holders the taxpayer will be abused.
As a taxpayer does it really matter whether your abuser is a man or a woman?
We should just rid of this ridiculous post.. “the powers u think I have bull crap” only to realize the only power is to continue the drain on our resources
So that’s how we decide on important matters now, based on gender?? We still remember the former P M that’s enough. What we need is the best person if it’s a female fine but stop that gender crap
We need the best person who can independently discharge the duties in the office of the president to serve Trinidad and Tobago. The promotion of gender only is counter productive to our republic.
My worry is our serious lack of imagination and level of insipid comfort with the status quo. Discussion of a woman President is met with resentment and talk of competence as though the gender pay gap does not exist and if you look at the Board rooms and all places where serious decisions are taken in our country, they’re occupied by men. Women are passed over and many still see women’s place in the home with memes that women need to know how to make roti to be able to marry… and apart from the fact that most graduating with degrees are women, theyre underemployed or receive less pay than men in most instances. The claim that competence matters falls flat on its face in a context of patriarchy and cultural hegemony of middle class men’s claim natural heir to leadership in the country. And where the Prime Minister is caught out on being misogynistic and sexist at every possible turn. CAFRA offers a serious list and topic for serious discussion. Most dismiss it with emotive talk of we had Kamla, and what? That is completely irrelevant if the system is set up for women to fail… I agree Kamla was a failure but the discourse here continues to perpetuate that same sexism of years gone by. Where have people been for the last 30 years? I can’t believe we just do not have imagination on what else is possible or how we can escape the limits that our institutions have set to ensure that our elite continue to ride roughshod over our democracy, and rights to articulate how we want to be governed and how governance should take place. We can do better than this. We need to be a lot better. The first step is critical thinking and informed discussion.
Funny enough, the media is one industry in T&T that had its fair share of women leaders.
I worked under Sunity Maharaj, Kathy Ann Waterman and Omatie Lyder as editor in chiefs. Then I had editors like the late Deborah John among others. The late Therese Mills was Newsday’s spine for years and Judy Raymond has served at the helm of the Guardian and is now the big boss at Newsday.
For me, it is odd that women aren’t given as much of a chance in other fields.
That’s awesome Lasana. I’m sure all of them had their fair share of challenges. I’m just very concerned about the facile and very poor level discussion that some on this thread insist on having and perpetrating. Its tiresome and really speaks to a serious absence of consciousness about issues women face and more than that those who are brave enough to occupy leadership roles in this place rife with contradiction and dysfunction.
Agreed. But we all have different experiences and they help shape our mindset too. So I just try to understand why people think the way they do first.
There is another irony here btw. Gladys Gafoor is plenty woman I think. Lol.
And let me add to that by saying I totally agree with her omission from this shortlist!
I listen, read and try to be empathetic but I don’t try to know how people’s minds work. That is too much… indeed we all do have experiences. But why should men have more opportunity to eff up the country more? One single experience of a woman leader is seen as enough and that precludes all others? That’s plain dotish. We can certainly judge people on their merits and trackrecords, but cannot pretend that we all equally face the same structural and institutional realities.
The level of reasoning here is like I’m reading a 1950s article about women.
I hear you Keston. But somehow despite the huge gender gap you speak of, wouldn’t it sound disingenuous to you to appoint a woman because you want to narrow the gap? Doesn’t that sound a bit like “Is we time now”?? I never liked that as a philosophy.
I could understand what you mean… and my intention is not to be disingenuous. It is to acknowledge the seriousness of this discussion. And to advance what I think are important and genuine reasons why we should not dismiss a woman President. The discussion has been poor and misinformed. Men are NOT the default gender to hold positions of high office. Sometimes we act as though they are even perhaps we don’t intend to and unwittingly give them the reins because we’re afraid to be bold and assertive about this. The discussion seems to be suggesting that. We need to recognise women as fully capable and high achieving members of our society. CAFRA has its mandate and I’m presuming they are fully clear and able to defend their position on why they are making this suggestion. We cannot pretend it’s all honky dorry. It’s also not tokenism to say explicitly we want a woman President if we recognise them as full human beings. What is the fear about that? I do not get it.
I personally don’t think there’s a fear. In fact I believe most people are impressed by the calibre of the women suggested. But I would shy away from an argument for a particular gender. It’s only because we’ve had presidents of many races that people not suggesting it’s time for an Indian president or African one or red one etc. It still sounds to me like “is we time now”. When Gafoor was suggested I was glad for the diversity in proposing a woman and a man. But of course after reading her history she turned out to be a poor choice.
“calibre of the women suggested”
We don’t have a calibre here
We only have cliques, pastures, terrain, pillars and towers.
Being a big fish in a fishbowl Is Not aTestament eh
Suggesting a candidate based on gender is clearly different from choosing someone based on racial or ethnic category. If the logic is to conflate the two, I done. Happy New Year! Have a wonderful day!
Your contribution Keaton gives me a very salient aspect of “exam” for any candidate, male or female:
How has their life work proven a sway against “insipid comfort with the status quo”
Keston K. Perry, I acknowledge that TnT, like many other places has a wage gap. But that, in this instance, is irrelevant when we speak of the Office of the President, because wage is fixed. So are the other wages for public office. Disparity comes in the private sector, mostly in non-unionised sectors. And we have to acknowledge the role of the ‘boys club’ in all of this.
As for jobs themselves, from my experience in Trinidad, many women have been working in non-traditional sectors for a long time, but maybe the boys club is not ready/prepared to accepted such changes/challenges. Keeping in mind the history of women in the workplace locally-that is, it is still relatively recent compared to that of males, so women may not have had a chance to reach maximum earning potential. Added to that, women can utilise benefits such as maternity leave, parental leave etc. So they can be out of the workforce more. These are all issues to bear in mind in such discussions, it can’t be a general discussion of men v women.
The simple point was the disparities between genders justify it as a useful criteria. To pretend they do not exist is counterproductive as to say that ‘competence’ is all that matters for selection of a President when that is judged as a natural consideration when men are being touted for a job. That is the point not where you went.
It’s very difficult to converse with you as we seem to have different understandings of what equality looks like. While you’ seem to have accepted disparity and inequity as a natural process in the working experiences of men and women; that women are not working long enough to have the same salary. This is incorrect especially since working in the home often goes unaccounted for as legitimate “work”. Your comment is confusing. It seems to lack an underlying recognition of need for parity between men and women. As for the so-called claim of ‘added benefits’ that come with reproduction and child rearing, comparing things in that way is rather silly. For many, those are not benefits but entitlements which need to be considered on its own terms not in the sense that men receive ‘less benefits’. This is turning out to be a rather odd discussion.
Thus proving my point: Women don’t necessarily, and often Don’t come with an elevated, enlightened nor improved perspective from males. And just cause they name woman don’t mean I need any more misogyny , patriarchy , or quenks in dresses.
Thank you all!
Well Keston you might think it illogical to conflate picking a woman president with picking a president based on race or religion etc but…
http://newsday.co.tt/2018/01/06/pundit-happy-but-asks-why-no-hindu-head-of-state/
Well, logical people will not do it. Plus, Noor Hassanali was Muslim.
I know Noor was Muslim. That’s why is only Hindus complaining.
How do we chose a President and what do they realy have to do and what sallary do they get???
I am confused!!! totally!!!
Shouldnt we be seeking to put who is BEST for the job????….man OR woman?
We simply need to move away from this biassed way of thinking…its this same lopsided attitude that is keeping us in the race dungeon….
Let us go for the BEST….
I am willing to bet the next president will be yet another in a series of quenks.
They might as well appoint an actual quenk and call that George!
Well the quenk we have now I sure will make the next quenk look good?..
No scratch that…The last sports minister was supposed to make this one look good…?
The quenk we have now made the previous quenk look good. We committed to degenerating.
Nah Vern. Max wasn’t that bad. His only sin was partying. He never buff us up and wine on us?
Everything in life is relative. Max’s partying and vomiting outside fete was a point of criticism during his tenure, but once Powers took over and started his excesses Max’s debauchery seemed harmless. Neither of them were anywhere near ideal, infact they both helped us lower the bar for the presidency.
Yes Vernal I’ll drink to dat?
Thank you for this sub thread and your contributions.
Cause all I think is Great. Another list of inglorious female candidates to match that of the males.
If not Reginald Dumas.
There is not Even his female counterpart.
And he is just the best of the lit. Not that sterling either
Anybody the government elect for President the opposition will have a problem with them woman or man just two months ago a young bright woman was made an ambassador and look how she was treated by the opposition and their supporters if a woman is elected President they would treat her worst
Clearly this organization is misguided. As a professional woman I want a job based on my qualifications and experience not my gender. It is precisely this attitude that has the country in the mess it is in. A lot of square pegs in round holes.
Take note that there have been acting female Presidents, 2 that I know of: Dr. Linda Babolal and currently President of Senate Christine Kangaloo. If there is a female President elected by Electoral College not a problem with me personally. My view is may the best person be placed as our President.
Lots of eminent women mentioned in that list. I have a problem with the “it’s time for a woman president” though. I believe it’s time for a COMPETENT and RESPECTED president. We used to have them. I don’t have a problem with adding any of those women to the list of qualifiers. I just don’t want them to appoint a woman because she’s a woman. Although Tanty Kams left a bitter taste in plenty people mouth, she wasn’t voted for just for being a woman. Lol. We were just that desperate for change
Competence, integrity and respect for the office should ideally be the only criteria! If we find these qualities in one of these women great but the gender should not be the main issue.
That criteria, in a nutshell, should apply to any holder of public office!
Should be ? Why do we want to down that road? Why shouldn’t it be put the same women in the ring, along with all others so deserving, based on merit ;not because of gender or ethnicity.
We have seen what Affirmative Action in the US has produced or the failed to produce…. we want to go foward looking behind, instead of reflecting and learning from the past.
Why can’t we do what is really required? And that is, revise the status and power of the office of the President, from being a “figurehead/rubbers tamp to one with genuine powers and standing.
we just had a woman PM…look how that turned out
just kidding…but seriously what next President in terms of race next?
Let’s not go down that road.
The Presidency is a colonial institution that further consolidates the rule of the class…Why do we need a President? Neo-colonialism nurtures itself on the belief that it is made in the image and likeness of the imperial elite..President/Chief Justice/Prime Minister/Archbishop/ Santa claus and imported fried chicken..Oh First lady too!
Fine, let’s call him Cacique then. Or maybe ‘Big Kahuna.’
I’d say that is another conversation we can have for sure Rae.
Yes TNT does not need a president cut the wasteful spending ,instead use the Supreme Court if one exist to arbitrate government issues
Thank you Rae
I believe one of the criteria is the person must be experienced in Law, Max was the only one who differed , he is an educator,. Anyway, “powers I have/did not have” knew law,but what a disappointment. My issue is this discussion we are having right now should have been taking place in the public domain. CONSTRUCTIVE discussionss. No we waited on the government to drop their bombshell, That’s how they ALL do things to catch us off guard, they already had someone. They simply announced it and end of story. It’s the same thing over and over. I don’t know MR Nelson but his position on the Rolph Balgobin sexual harrassment case, told me he was handpicked and already in their pocket. Where is the civil society involvement, Just talk, talk.
BTW, Vernal Damion Cadogan do we still have that bet on that the President would not be selected/appointed by the deadline?…. lol
I not betting against that.
Like all yuh forget wah we geh for d first female Prime Minister!!!
Unfortunately people are not forgetting our first female Prime Minister so therefore another woman in leadership position may be a long time coming to be accepted. While I like the gender equity, believe it could be a woman as President, but know how SOME people are feeling about another woman in leadership. Just hope Electoral College chooses the best person for the position of President and not let their female bias get in the way.
Funny I never heard someone say ‘remember what happen with our first male (PM or whatever)…we better be cautious about putting back a man…’
Yasmin, maybe bald headed men like me have no chance again in the future if Rowley doesn’t lift his game. Lol. I’m kidding. You made an excellent point.
Lol worries for you Lasana Liburd
Stupid comment… not even slightly funny
She was far better than what we have at present.
True!
She was caring.
what.?
Did u remember we had male for how many years? Dont blame anyone
My New years resolution is going good so far….I promised not to respond to ignoramuses on FB.
Who was that?
Please remind us?
A very good person… Who was slandered and maligned and lost to a misogynist. Like Trump
I believe the most qualified person should get the job; regardless of gender.
That is rubbish get the best person for the job man or woman. That is true equality.
I’m not in agreement with this idea it’s time for a woman. Getting something just because is a retrograde step.
There is no 1000 likes button …sigh
Pick a President on the basis of gender? Then what race? Followed by religion? And dietary preferences? Let’s go all the way then>>A chinese, a dougla, a First peoples? A good all fours player? And we wonder why we are sometimes seen as a laughing stock?.
Lasana you tempting me to crack jokes, looking at the honourable minister would you have guessed he is the minister of sport without prior knowledge… I do take your point. I have had the honour of working with Drayton and she is class. Presidential material. There may be others of her calibre but I don’t know them. No issue with President being female, more concerned with the calibre
Rossana not Helen Drayton. Maybe there are others like her however she is a Leader
No offence to the ladies but unless it is not Helen Drayton. Forget that. I had my five years of Kams. Pass
5 years.. 3 months… lets heal from that shit first
Remember , it has always been a POLITICAL appointee, to do the party’ s bidding,. The President to me is a’toothless bulldog’ with limited power , a yes man,
Rossana Glasgow true.. but we have had robbie.. Noor… and Ellis .. some good people and even Max is FAR BETTER than CAPTAIN Fing Powers …..
Christian, you could reverse that argument and say that if Darryl Smith is a poor Sport Minister and also a man—future Sport ministers shouldn’t be men.
I don’t think that follows at all.
Lasana Liburd what he means is that…. no other person has disappointed him.. in so many ways than Kams.. that she makes it hard for him and many others to be easily open minded about a woman president now.. especial after part of Kams campaign was that she is a woman.. a mother.. and so forth
Andre the one part I’d agree with is that Kamla was a poor PM. I’d also say gender is not a plus either way. Competence is.
But certainly women should have equal opportunity for any job.
There is no such thing a “Equal” opportunity…. And there never should be….. Either you qualify, or you dont…. Either your the best person for the job, or your not…..
Lasana Liburd Trini.. but again the level disappointment .. is large.. that is like having your own dog bite you hard… you will always watch it cut eye from that day forward.. cant blame him for that
Andre well perhaps if you don’t come in contact with competent professional women.
I get your analogy. I just never saw Kamla or even Hillary being the emissaries of their respective genders.
But I do accept that Trinidad and Tobago have elected a woman to one of the highest positions available in the country.
Andre you’re talking passed the guy. There’s a logical point being made and it’s being ignored. Is that how people communicate?
You’re comparing electing a woman president to a dog biting you hard? Lol are you serious?
Lasana Liburd there are many capable women… but the point remains.. as i stated some would not be open minding to one now..
Hillary and Kamla should never be mentioned in the same sentence. One was ably prepared, the other was frequently impaired.
Keston that is a norm, but you want to tell me this was surprising news? People always talk about changing how things are done re governments appointment of HEADS of various institutions,to involve citizens,. Yet they only act when the government announce things 2-3 weeks. Really poor excuse. People living under a rock in this country? Hints of anew Pres was circling for some time now . Nothing was done.Anyway, Christmas done , party start, who really cares in T&T.? Sweet,t sweet Trinidad, oh how i love my country bad.
The appointment of a president, how it’s done and when it’s done is mandated in our constitution. An announcement a few weeks ago is irrelevant to this fact
Why bring up this issue within this short time period . we do the same ineffective things over and over, Why weren’t women groups lobbying for this prior to now?. Reactionary people. Get serious. I am certain I’m not the only person knew Mr Carmona was not making a 2nd term. Passivity is Trinis downfall. Where do you think changes has to come from? WE THE PEOPLE
The government didn’t announce that the President would be elected soon beforehand to enable any discussion.
The election of a new president is mandated in the Constitution though and wasn’t something that snuck up on us. There was always going to be an election this year, even if Carmona wanted to serve a 2nd term.
I know and agree, but there is usually a wait upon government to offer some direction as to how we’re going. This was only done in December.
The notification was published in December though……and that’s not done by a political party or the government….
Correct, Alana Morton. Parliament informed as such.
So December (which I mentioned above) is sufficient time to have a serious discussion about the criteria and who the public may favour as a President? But CAFRA producing this article is too late?
Therein lies the problem in a system where there is no direct election of a President, Keston K. Perry. Who the public may prefer has often not been the choice of the Electoral College.
Colin, I am FULLY aware of the process of electing a President. Dont need schooling on that. That is beside the point of having a servant government showing leadership that is transparent and willing to engage the public on such an appointment given our recent experience with Powers.
Keston K. Perry .b.s.
I could get behind Bridget Brereton. Nobody else is on the same planet as her when it comes to Trinidad & Tobago history. She could do a lot for cultural appreciation.
This would be very counterintuitive under a Rowley Administration.
I disagree. Sex should not be the deciding factor in this. Gimme a break!
So correct…what does sex/gender have to do with choosing a President!
It have everything to do with choosing a wife.
And not a president!
I so agree with you. We should not select someone for this important office because we think it’s time for a woman to hold this office. Let’s select based on merit please. Steups.
Oma panday for president !
What a bullshit reason to elect a president. We have become so blinded by our focus that we have become what we strive against.