Daly Bread: Into the political hereafter; as Opposition Leader shows up Govt response to Privy Council

There is a new example of political truth being stranger than fiction. It is that it takes two very wobbly Attorneys General to make a distrusted Opposition look good.

When it was not trying to pretend that the outcome of the recent case in the Privy Council (the PC) was not a defeat, although it plainly was, the Government—through its current attorney general Reginald Armour SC—spent a lot of time absurdly pretending that its failed attempt to extend the life of local government councillors and aldermen was in effect an understandable error.

Attorney general Reginald Armour SC (centre) is flanked by Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley (right) and Finance Minister Colm Imbert in Parliament
(Copyright Office of the Parliament 2023)

However on Monday last in Parliament, when debate began on the necessary validating local government legislation, the Opposition looked good not only because the Attorney General (the AG) persisted in the chosen Government spin that its defeat in the PC was not a defeat.

The leader of the Opposition, Kamla Persad Bissessar, is unattractively embedded in leadership of the Opposition, despite a number of significant electoral losses that should have sent her into the political hereafter. Nevertheless, she did well exposing the fact that, when it belatedly proclaimed the successfully challenged extension, the Government must have known that it was reversing a position it had previously put before the Parliament.

In the House of Representatives, the Leader of the Opposition made that point by reminding us of speeches in 2019 recorded in Hansard—both her words as well as those of the previous but since demoted Attorney General, Faris Al Rawi.

That previously held position was that amendments to the Municipal Corporations Act would not be used for the purpose of keeping incumbent councillors and aldermen in office for an additional year beyond the due date of the next election.

Yet when, as a consequence of that reversal, the Privy Council ruled that the Miscellaneous Provisions (local Government Reform) Act 2022 could not be used for that purpose, the Government feigned surprise and claimed innocent motivation.

Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar.
(Copyright Office of the Parliament 2023)

The Trinidad Express newspaper carried a full report of that blow struck by Kamla (as she is generally known).

The front page summarised the moment as follows: “Kamla proves through 2019 Hansard she had warned Government against using the Local Government Reform bill to extend the life of current councillors and to delay election. Warnings were completely shot down by then AG Al Rawi who described it as ‘poppycock’ and ‘absolute nonsense’.”

The reason why Al Rawi so scathingly described Kamla’s position revealed a serious credibility gap on the Government’s part. In 2019 he told the House it was: “Absolute nonsense! Because Mr Deputy Speaker, we have to be reminded that as the Honourable Prime Minister said, an election will be called when due.”

Minister of Local Government and former attorney general Faris Al-Rawi.
(via Office of the Attorney General)

That’s exactly what the Government did not do. Plainly put, the Government went back on its word until restrained by the PC decision, which declared the Government’s position “inimical to democracy”.

Much hating on each other goes on in the Parliament, but on this occasion the Opposition, in rant free speech, made its case that the Government knowingly misled the House and the country.

Good points are lost when the speakers in Parliament on both sides are in the habit of being keyed up and uncontrollably aggressive. However, I am not optimistic that there will be a lasting change to rant free presentations.

Leader of the Opposition Kamla Persad-Bissessar tears up the Speaker’s guidelines during an extraordinary sitting of the House on Thursday 21 October 2021.
(Copyright Office of the Parliament 2021)

Meanwhile there was a provision in clause 5 of the validating legislation that validation would go “thereafter”—that is beyond 18 May, the date of the PC decision, to the commencement of the validating Act. Having resisted the Opposition’s suggestion in the House to delete clause 5, as a result of a subsequent conversation with Independent Senator Paul Richards, Government moved in the Senate to delete from Clause 5 the words:

“[…] and thereafter exercise the functions of Councillors and Aldermen up until the commencement of this Act.”

But are we done with the political hereafter of this local government fiasco?

Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley.
(via Office of the Prime Minister)

Although it may be unlikely that enough voters in the coming local government elections will turn out to increase the usual abysmally low poll, we wait to see whether the “rumbling and tumbling in the atmosphere” over the electorate’s right to vote will produce a different poll dynamic.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Why is accountability only demanded of ‘the other side’?

“[…] What kind of society are we building when the working class is always the first to feel the axe? Read more

Daly Bread: Crumbled oversight function continues to haunt state enterprises

Last Sunday, I traced the perils of having the state enterprises unrestrained by diligent and timely oversight by the constitutionally Read more

Daly Bread: The problem with governments’ management of state boards

Integrity, accountability, financial prudence and consequence management are not simply partisan political issues. They relate to the socio-economic health and Read more

Noble: Beware of frenemies—why Labour should be wary of Gov’t union

It is usual for all attention to be put on Tubal Uriah Butler on Labour Day. This year, however, my Read more

MSJ: T&T Labour movement can breathe after Rowley’s relentless attacks

“[…] The 10 years under the Dr Keith Rowley-led PNM saw a vicious attack on the trade union movement and Read more

Noble: PNM, quo vadis? Anatomy of T&T’s electoral results

“There are two things that are important in politics,” said Mark Hanna, a 19th-century businessman and political kingmaker in Cleveland, Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: Why is accountability only demanded of ‘the other side’?

“[…] What kind of society are we building when the working class is always the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.