Daly Bread: A tsunami of grief; moving on from Petrotrin

Two weeks ago, I asserted that the proposed closure of the Petrotrin refinery was a socio-economic earthquake attributable to the State enterprise fault line that runs right through our economy.

That earthquake has produced its tsunami. It is a tsunami of grief. The question is this: Do we understand that in this closure, which follows years of warning signs, there is also a strong element of the poison of “we like it so” and its first cousin “might as well” as in “might as well take a drink, we cyar do nutten anyway”?

Avoidance of reforms to head off later trouble is ingrained in our culture. That is why “the city could bun dong, we jammin’ still” was a runaway hit.

Photo: Workers at Petrotrin refinery.
(Copyright Industriall.union.org)

However, incessant jammin’ can be a harmful, slow acting poison. It will cause gripes eventually, although the gripe pains may lie sedated and a fatal outcome postponed as long as there is sufficient money in the national cash register—namely the Treasury—enabling the suppression of the gripes.

The principal gripe suppressant is the ability to lead a big pappy life marked by conspicuous consumption of the goodies flowing from unearned or semi-legal largesse or by putting it all on the credit card to the max.

There is little attention paid to the high price of the big pappy life, which remains the unquestioning giving and acceptance of State payment for the feasts. This has created the infamous dependency syndrome.

Now a piece of the city has bun down. During the fortnight break since my last column, even some hardliners who previously believed that we could forever sustain the flawed State enterprise model have seen the light and are tasting the grief that they have brought down upon others.

Yet as Petrotrin goes down, the “vibes cyar done”. Even mid-week, there were bars full of patrons in awesome party mode, having come from Caribbean Premier League (CPL) T20 cricket matches, although there are many who neither want to nor can afford to pay $25 for a beer in order to be seen and take a selfie in the “right” places.

Photo: Former prime minister Basdeo Panday (right) and his wife Oma support TKR during 2018 CPL Eliminator action against SKNP at the Brian Lara Academy in Tarouba on 14 September 2018.
(Copyright Allan V Crane/CA-Images/Wired868)

The polarisation of and the wealth divide in our society grows deeper and more evident when times are hard and the Mr Dividers go into overdrive to keep the disappointed troops onside. Those are integral and dangerous aspects of the grief that follows the fall of a mega proper-upper like Petrotrin.

While we have partied and denied reality the world “has been remade around data”. Neither our education nor economic systems have changed to stay relevant in that remade world but there is no longer enough money in the Treasury to mind us or to keep us happy and wotless, no matter what.

My fellow commentator and realist, Dr Terrence Farrell, itemised those other enterprises in line, next to be severely shaken. He also outlined where we might go instead to make our economy less dependent on Government largesse and more relevant to the changed world.

It appears to me that this is a world which requires both the traditional white collar and blue collar workforces to adapt and fit themselves into new business models. Yet the hardline of our Mr Divider politics remains insular.

Visceral loyalties shelter our politics from a dire need for attitude change, without which bad politics will take many more citizens down. Sadly, therefore, the post-Petrotrin political exchanges have been marked by race and class references.

Photo: Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley (left) and Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar SC.
(Copyright Power102fm)

Sari pulling, and characterisation as an Oreo, are deeply offensive. In the contest for dwindling resources and traditional “easy-kai wuk”, the inflammatory properties of such events magnify. Put simply, the self-restraint underlying the status quo of “how we vote is not how we party” can be overthrown.

I pause here to pay my personal tribute to renowned photographer, Andre Alexander, who passed away during my break. My nickname for him, to which he answered, was Misery. It denoted his persistence in getting his photographic subject. I chose a photograph of his for the cover of The Daly Commentaries.

Limes will not be the same without Andre and his watchful eye. Misery, I will miss you, pardner.

More from Wired868
Daly Bread: Legislative trees, shrivelling fruit—T&T must move from ‘commemoration to completion’

As I have made plain, I value the commentaries contained in letters to the editor. Last week I quoted the Read more

Daly Bread: Making sport with our money—state enterprise system remains “fertile ground for mismanagement”

In these weekly columns I have pursued certain matters that the leaders whom we elect by means of general elections Read more

Daly Bread: Crunch time! Can UNC Gov’t transform T&T from “get-away” place for criminals?

In the recent past, governments both of the United National Congress (UNC) and of the Peoples National Movement (PNM) have Read more

Daly Bread: T&T must avoid ‘democratic backsliding’, in face of a three-fifths majority

Against the background of recent attacks on the Independent senators, I outlined last week the two constraints on three-fifths special Read more

Noble: Is this the road to growth? Can T&T put country before party?

On 4 April 2025, then Caricom head Mia Mottley, in discussing the global crises as they impacted the Caribbean, said: Read more

Daly Bread: The justification for ‘Independent’ senators and special majority constraints

Several readers have pressed me to say how I felt on the merits of the Prime Minister’s Pension (Amendment) Bill, Read more

Check Also

Daly Bread: Legislative trees, shrivelling fruit—T&T must move from ‘commemoration to completion’

As I have made plain, I value the commentaries contained in letters to the editor. …

One comment

  1. “how we vote is not how we party” I wouldn’t categorically refer to that as an expression that demonstrates self restraint. It feels more like part of the same political dance. You fight for the immediate right to exploit and then throw a conciliatory party. When resources are tighter it simply exposes the farcical side.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.