Noble: Mary’s Boy Child, the Troublemaker—will we join Jesus’ war with the Establishment?

As Christmas is upon us again, the lyrics of Away in a Manger appear relevant today.

Away in a manger/ no crib for his bed/ The little Lord Jesus laid down his sweet head;/The stars in the heavens looked down where he lay/ The little Lord Jesus, asleep on the hay.

The Nativity…

The manger, the star, the kings bearing gifts and the shepherds all speak to the humanity of the Nativity story. But to focus on this scene is to miss the import of the Christmas story: Jesus, Mary’s Boy Child, came to earth to be a troublemaker, but the world continues to be in trouble because it refuses to acknowledge the alternative presented by the coming of Jesus.

Many of us believe that Mary was silent in the Nativity story, but she uttered the most revolutionary words in the Gospel. She set out the conflict the Boy Child was destined to bring.

Luke 2: 50 – 55 says: “His mercy is for those who fear him from generation to generation./ He has shown strength with his arm;/ He has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts./ He has brought down the powerful from their thrones, and lifted up the lowly;/ He has filled the hungry with good things, and sent the rich away empty./ He has helped his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy, according to the promise he made to our ancestors, to Abraham and to his descendants forever.”

This bright red line puts Jesus at war with the Establishment. We miss the declaration by remaining focused on the manger. He was against the proud, the powerful and the rich. He was against the Roman Empire since He was the fulfilment of an ancient promise.

We should not miss the violent response of Herod to the announcement of His coming. Herod found the news of His birth so politically troubling that he ordered the killing of all male children under two years of age.

An illustration of Jesus in the temple.

At the end of his time on earth, the Jews taunted the then Herod by reminding him that Caesar Augustus would be unhappy with the granting of a pardon. Mary’s Boy Child was subversive. He challenged the political kingdom of the day.

The Church’s silence and her fawning at the feet of some politicians are not consistent with His message. Mary’s Boy Child came in the tradition of the Old Testament prophets—a critic of the powerful. How do we reconcile our desire for ‘Likes’ and applause with following this Boy Child?

He openly spoke of His Kingdom, thereby throwing down the gauntlet to Caesar Augustus. At the time of Jesus’ birth, Augustus had achieved peace in the then world—a unique achievement in two hundred years: a serenity created by complete obedience to him.

By decreeing that there be a census, Augustus caused Mary and Joseph to take their Boy Child on a hazardous journey to Bethlehem. But Augustus was not in charge of events.

Be still and know…

The little town of Bethlehem was prophesied to be His birthplace. Augustus was merely facilitating the fulfilment of the prophecy. This lack of appreciation for our place in history leads us to misunderstand the limited power of politicians and the Establishment.

We squirm because we do not connect to the past nor see the future. We forget the words of the Angel who announced his birth: “Of his kingdom, there will be no end.” The story of Christmas forces us to choose which kingdom we will honour.

Jesus fulfilled Mary’s words through His work among the poor. He made marginalised people the centre of his time on earth: He healed them, sat with them and chose them in a direct rebuke to the Establishment.

Jesus (left) washes the feet of his disciplines in a scene by the Italian painter Duccio di Buoninsegna.
Buoninsegna was one of the most influential painters of his time and his illustrations of Jesus were done more than a century before Michelango’s ‘Italianised’ version of Jesus.

Do we recall His whipping the merchants out of the Temple? That was a frontal challenge to the commercial interests of the day.

Where did we get the impression that we need to comfort and cuddle those whose god is their money? Are we as brave as Archbishop Helder Camara of Brazil, who once said: “When I fed the poor, they called me a saint. When I asked, ‘Why are they poor?’ they called me a communist.”

The Establishment desires us to do good but never challenge them or the system that enables their hold on society.

The religious leaders were not exempt from his criticism. He was no nice guy. He chastised the Scribes and the Pharisees and severely reprimanded those who characterised themselves as teachers. He sparred with them when they mocked the poor or made fun of what ostracised people had to offer.

A satirical take on Jesus’ views on healthcare.
(Copyright Mike Peters)

The outcast was at the centre of His work on earth. Why do we turn our backs on the poor? If we do this, what is the use of the Christmas message?

Mary’s Boy Child was a troublemaker who turned things upside down. He opposed those in charge who oppressed the poor and needy. He was not meek and mild. He challenges us today to help those who are downtrodden and in need of help.

Shall we stay at the manger? Mary’s Boy Child calls us to right the wrongs of the society in which we live. Which one will we choose this Christmas?

Wired868 has provided readers with solid, independent journalism since 2012. If you appreciate our work, please contribute to our efforts.

Support Independent Journalism

More from Wired868
Noble: Mayaro is reaping the bitter fruit of T&T’s “success”

“[...] The crime situation is very terrible. Being a parent, I do not believe in condoning wrong things. It’s really Read more

Noble: Youth Lost: an avoidable tragedy writ large, with dire societal consequences

What is teenage life if not fun as we explore new boundaries? You meet new secondary school friends and, with Read more

Demming: Pan should be part of education curriculum, to maximise its value

“Pan is in good hands,” they said—after experiencing the energy and exuberance of the Junior Panorama finals at the Queen’s Read more

Noble: The problem with vilifying Christine Kangaloo; and how it makes us poorer

Over the last two weeks, we have witnessed an unceasing commentary on Ms Christine Kangaloo’s supposed lack of fitness for Read more

Noble: Our Presidential Journey, and lessons from T&T’s history

“That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons Read more

Noble: Believe for 2023; finding joy in gloom

Straight out of the gates, on 2 January 2023, the news hit like a bucket of cold water. As though Read more

About Noble Philip

Noble Philip
Noble Philip, a retired business executive, is trying to interpret Jesus’ relationships with the poor and rich among us. A Seeker, not a Saint.

Check Also

Noble: Mayaro is reaping the bitter fruit of T&T’s “success”

“[…] The crime situation is very terrible. Being a parent, I do not believe in …

2 comments

  1. Noble Philip argues that the true message of the Christman story is that of defying authority. “This bright red line puts Jesus at war with the Establishment…The outcast was at the centre of His time on earth,” writes Philip.

    Curiously, at no time over the past two years of the pandemic did Philip, whose articles appear regularly in the newspapers, criticize any measure or mandate by the Government. Instead, up to a year ago, his position was one of complete obedience. Back then, in a column titled “Crisis, Chaos and Freedom”, he wrote “Some believe the virus present no real threat to Christians because the blood of Jesus is mighty. Sadly, this position finds little support in the Bible’s teaching.” (Express December 19, 2021)

    This was a strawman. While some Christians did believe that God would protect them from the virus, their position is essentially no different from religious leaders who assert that prayers can solve the nation’s problems. Indeed, just a few days ago, Prime Minister Keith Rowley called for citizens to use prayer as a crime-fighting measure.

    Most people who opposed the Government’s pandemic policies, whether Christian or atheist like myself, did so on the basis of State overreach and scientific error. They argued that lockdowns would cause economic hardship, that mask and vaccine mandates were transgressions, and natural immunity was more effective than an mRNA vaccine at preventing infection. All this is now known to be true.

    Yet, until a few months ago, all around the Western world, everybody who refused to wear masks or take the jab were demonised and became second-class citizens, banned from entering certain places and even confined to their homes under threat of jail and fines.

    Philip, who now writes that Jesus “made marginalised people the centre of his time on earth,” had not one word to say against this Government-enforced marginalization of half the country’s populace. However, if he has now changed his position, I am happy he has seen the light, even though I believe the story of Jesus’ birth to be completely false.

    Kevin Baldeosingh

    Freeport

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.