Dear Editor: Doesn’t NIB chairman’s appointment violate NIS Act? Whose side is Govt really on?

“Patrick Ferreira has been appointed chairman of the National Insurance Board [despite being] chairman of Furness Chemicals Ltd, Furness Shipping & Marketing Ltd and Furness Personnel Services Ltd [and] CEO of Furness Rentals Ltd, Furness Properties Ltd and Furness Investments Ltd.

“[…] Do you think that this business tycoon is going to come down hard on his business colleagues who deduct NIS contributions from their workers’ emoluments but do not remit them to the Board? […]”

The following Letter to the Editor, which discusses the appointment by Government of a new ‘independent’ chairman of the NIB, was submitted to Wired868 by Gerry Kangalee, national education and research officer of the National Workers Union (NWU):

Photo: Newly appointed NIBTT chairman Patrick Ferreira.
(Copyright Gary Jordan/ NIBTT)

Patrick Ferreira has been appointed chairman of the National Insurance Board. He was appointed to the Board as a director in 2017, one of the three government appointees as spelt out in the National Insurance Act.

Now he has been made chairman in violation of that very Act, which stipulates that the post of chairman should be held by an individual who, in the opinion of the minister, is independent of business, labour and the government.

This ‘independent chairman’ is chairman of Furness Chemicals Ltd, Furness Shipping & Marketing Ltd and Furness Personnel Services Ltd. He is currently CEO of Furness Rentals Ltd, Furness Properties Ltd and Furness Investments Ltd. He has served as Director of the Deposit Insurance Corporation, which is a subsidiary of the Central Bank and director of TT NGL, a subsidiary of the National Gas Company, a state-owned company.

In the opinion of the Minister of Finance, this gentleman is ‘independent’. We all know that Minister Dey-Ent-Riot-Yet holds much of the citizenry in rather low esteem. Of the three sectors stated in the Act (Business, Labour and Government), the only one Ferreira seems to be independent of is Labour.

Image: A satirical take on the relationship between businesses and unions.
(Copyright Carol Simpson)

Do you think that this business tycoon is going to come down hard on his business colleagues who deduct NIS contributions from their workers’ emoluments but do not remit them to the Board? Do you think he will pursue those who are not even registered with the NIB?

In 2018, employers were in arrears of over $437m. In 2017, employer arrears amounted to $565m. In 2016, the total was $383m. In fact, every year employers’ arrears total hundreds of millions of dollars.

Section 40 of the NIS Act reads thus: ‘An employer who fails or neglects to pay or effect payment of contribution in respect of any person in his employment who is required to be insured under this Act is liable on summary conviction to a fine of four thousand dollars and six months’ imprisonment’—a provision more noted for being breached left, right and centre than for its implementation.

For those who have eyes to see, it is becoming increasingly clear that the One Percent is moving to consolidate its control of the State; this is merely another indication that, with the economic pie shrinking, inter-clique rivalry is intensifying and re-alignment of forces is taking place.

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: All at SEA—changes needed in T&T’s education system

“[…] T&T’s education system thus faces two challenges—decades old, but now more pressing in the context of 21st century market Read more

Dear Editor: Know the ground you’re standing on—talking points on proposed home invasion bill

“[…] While the proponents of this proposed bill argue that these laws will promote self-defense and personal responsibility, critics have Read more

St Louis: Union leaders inside UNC-led gov’t must speak up—workers are watching

Elements of the trade union movement now sits inside the coalition that governs Trinidad and Tobago. That should have brought Read more

Dear Editor: None but ourselves can free our minds…

“[…] The psychological impact of long-term oppression can be devastating, leading to a cycle of poverty, social alienation, and continued Read more

Dear Editor: Gov’t must be wary of religious extremists to avoid repeat of 1990

“[…] The 1990 coup demonstrated that unchecked religious freedom and extreme religious ideologies can pose a direct threat to democracy Read more

Kamla: “The rule of law remains our strongest shield”—lessons from July 27

“[…] Let us be clear: the perpetrators of July 1990 were not patriots. The true patriots defended the Constitution and Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: All at SEA—changes needed in T&T’s education system

“[…] T&T’s education system thus faces two challenges—decades old, but now more pressing in the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.