Dear Editor: It’s dangerous to dismiss safeguarding complaints—‘disgruntled’ parents add value

“[…] The pattern is familiar: someone speaks up, gets labelled, and only later do we come to understand the weight of what they tried to reveal.

“To be clear, I am not accusing anyone currently under a safeguarding ban of criminal behaviour. That is not my claim.

“My point is this: dismissing concerns with the word disgruntled is a dangerous reflex. It frames a person’s courage to speak out as mere bitterness or personal vendetta…”

The following Letter to the Editor, in response to concerns that the TTFA’s safeguarding policy might now be weaponised, was submitted to Wired868 by Dennis Tayé Allen, the managing director of TTGameplan:

The letter published under the headline, Misuse of safeguarding mechanisms can stain coach’s career, used the word ‘disgruntled’ four times.

Does the writer, ‘Brendon, a football fan’, have evidence to support that premise?

For all I can recall, many highly regarded figures in sport and authority circles were once publicly celebrated—until someone, often dismissed as disgruntled, dared to raise their voice about something deeply wrong.

The pattern is familiar: someone speaks up, gets labelled, and only later do we come to understand the weight of what they tried to reveal.

To be clear, I am not accusing anyone currently under a safeguarding ban of criminal behaviour. That is not my claim.

My point is this: dismissing concerns with the word disgruntled is a dangerous reflex. It frames a person’s courage to speak out as mere bitterness or personal vendetta.

History has taught us to pay closer attention to that label, because it’s often used to silence—not to seek truth.

And yet, after reading volumes of letters and commentary on this issue, I notice a glaring absence: almost no one is taking seriously the possibility that the complaint, or the person behind it, might be acting in good faith.

That the TTFA’s Safeguarding mechanisms exist for a reason. That those processes, as imperfect as they may be, are there to protect the vulnerable.

As someone who advocates loudly for children, youth, and athlete rights, I’ve learned not to judge motives—only to follow the facts.

And here’s what we know: an official arm of the TTFA issued a ban, restricting an individual from interacting with youth. That ban remains in effect as I write this. That is not speculation. That is a matter of record.

It’s easy to look back on major scandals and see them clearly—but in the moment, they always looked messy, uncomfortable, inconvenient.

The kids involved weren’t abducted. Their parents often trusted the adults around them. The signs weren’t neon.

And only when something didn’t sit right—only when someone finally asked the awkward question—did the truth begin to surface.

So when someone raises a concern, ‘disgruntled’ or not, maybe we should resist the urge to scoff. Maybe we should listen a little longer.

Those kids’ parents were none the wiser… till they became disgruntled.

More from Wired868

Dear Editor: Mulraine is right; TTFA must invest in talent identification

“[…] Instead of relying on one-off screening sessions, the TTFA should establish a structured scouting network that monitors players across Read more

Mulraine: Screening sessions to select national youth teams is lazy, inefficient and outdated

“[…] Anyone who has gone through this process knows the folly of trying to select the ‘best’ 20 players out Read more

Dear Editor: TTFA miscommunication denied East U-15 boys of national shot

“[…] Two days ago, it came to my attention, via the TTFA Facebook page, that screening for U15 boys were Read more

“He was the heartbeat of our team!” Eagles honour teenaged captain Kaniel Davidson

“[…] Kaniel Davidson was more than just a player—he was the heartbeat of our team. A natural leader on and Read more

Dear Editor: Gov’t must support community groups helping boys like Zwade

“[…] The government must do more than offer condolences. It must fund, support, and scale the grassroots programmes already working. Read more

Dear Editor: Safeguarding Dept should address obscene, abusive language by coaches

“[…] Under Fifa’s Code of Conduct and Disciplinary Code, the use of profanity or degrading language by coaches can constitute Read more

Letters to the Editor

Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com.
Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation.
We don’t publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.