Dear Editor: Why not introduce community service instead of fines for speeding, etc?

“[…] Imagine a system where those who have received fines for minor offenses, such as traffic violations or littering, or who have been convicted of petty crimes, are given the opportunity to contribute positively to their communities through community service.

“This initiative would not only alleviate the financial burden on these individuals but also provide tangible benefits to our society. By engaging these individuals in the cleaning and maintenance of our parks, rivers, beaches, and public spaces, we address two critical issues: the need for community upkeep and the cultivation of social responsibility among offenders…”

The following Letter to the Editor on the potential gains of introducing community service for minor crimes was submitted to Wired868 by George Elias of Cascade:

Community service crew.

As preparations for the National Budget progress, I would like to propose an initiative that could have a profound impact on our society: the introduction of community service for individuals serving non-custodial sentences or as an alternative to fines.

Imagine a system where those who have received fines for minor offenses, such as traffic violations or littering, or who have been convicted of petty crimes, are given the opportunity to contribute positively to their communities through community service.

This initiative would not only alleviate the financial burden on these individuals but also provide tangible benefits to our society. By engaging these individuals in the cleaning and maintenance of our parks, rivers, beaches, and public spaces, we address two critical issues: the need for community upkeep and the cultivation of social responsibility among offenders.

Attorney general Reginald Armour SC (centre) is flanked by Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley (right) and Finance Minister Colm Imbert in Parliament.
(Copyright Office of the Parliament 2023)

Community service is more than just a form of punishment; it is a rehabilitative experience that allows offenders to reintegrate into society with a renewed sense of purpose. Studies have shown that community service can reduce recidivism rates by offering offenders a chance to make amends and learn valuable skills.

This approach aligns with restorative justice principles, focusing on repairing harm and fostering reconciliation between offenders and the community.

Moreover, implementing community service as an alternative to incarceration or fines is a cost-effective strategy. It reduces the financial strain on our prison system and reallocates resources to more pressing needs, such as education and healthcare.

Community service as punishment.

Community service provides a constructive outlet for offenders, transforming them into contributors rather than liabilities.

In conclusion, introducing community service as an option for non-violent offenses should be prioritized in our national agenda. This initiative promises to rehabilitate offenders, enhance community well-being, and optimize resource allocation.

It is a win-win solution that deserves serious consideration and implementation in the near future.

More from Wired868
MFO: Ghany Poll used “questionable methodology”; rigor and transparency needed in public opinion research

“[…] Knowing public opinion helps parties in the closing weeks of an election… Well-done opinion polls that are made public Read more

Dear Editor: Aren’t we fed up of political games? Don’t we want better than this?

“[…] Surely, we are supposed to be fed up and tired of the mess perpetrated on us by politicians who Read more

Demming: Sandals offer must be fair to all—why I split with TDC over MOU

“[…] The now-infamous Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), exposed thanks to Afra Raymond’s successful legal challenge, showed a lopsided agreement. The Read more

Dear Editor: Appeal Court ruling on buggery drives home importance of constitutional reform

“[…] The [Appeal] Court ruled that, despite modern thinking and growing public support for human rights, parts of our Constitution Read more

Dr Farrell: Judicial independence vs accountability—why everyone loses in Ayers-Caesar v JLSC

“[…] Both the Privy Council and the Court of Appeal noted that the motivations of the JLSC [in the Marcia Read more

Dear Editor: Digitalisation of Carnival could lead to national transformation

“[...] Here in Trinidad and Tobago, the Road March results still rely on a manual system—TUCO officials physically count song Read more

Check Also

MFO: Ghany Poll used “questionable methodology”; rigor and transparency needed in public opinion research

“[…] Knowing public opinion helps parties in the closing weeks of an election… Well-done opinion …

3 comments

  1. Unfortunately, the writer is talking pure gobar. Research has shown there is no solid conclusive evidence that community service works.

  2. That is a wonderful idea if only the fines were really about penalizing individuals. It has been my analysis that the government, in their collective wisdom, are using the fines merely as a means of generating income. So recognizing that we are a lawless society, they have decided to capitalize on that. Nothing about the penalties are about behavior modification.

  3. The writer seems to be under the illusion that Trinidadians are civic minded.
    Laws are on the books to maintain and uphold societal order. The choice to live the untamed life is always available but one needs to understand that they can’t have both.
    The choice to live within civilized society requires a duty of civility; and that fortunately, for some needs laws; and the enforcement of those laws.
    Observing the speed limit and road traffic, litter and noise laws are all about community service.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.