Dear Editor: Death of Andrea murder suspects, while in TTPS custody, is cause for alarm 

“[…] I understand the pain and anguish that the friends and relatives of the murdered girl, Andrea Bharatt, must feel.

“[…] But we have the deaths of two men, whose fates have to be examined. In real life, vigilante justice is an incredibly slippery slope that we as a society should avoid at all cost…”

In the following Letter to the Editor, Orson Rogers of Belmont suggests why Trinidad and Tobago should be concerned about the death of two suspects—mortally injured while in police custody—for the unexplained death of Andrea Bharatt:

Photo: Andrea Bharatt, 23, went missing on 29 January 2021. Her body was found in the Heights of Aripo on 4 February 2021.

‘Whoever chases monsters should see to it that, in the process, he does not become a monster himself.’ — Friedrich Nietzsche

This has not been an easy letter to write bearing in mind the unfolding drama of the past weeks—one innocent girl murdered and two suspects dead resulting from interactions with police. (We await autopsies to reveal the causes.) 

I understand the pain and anguish that the friends and relatives of the murdered girl, Andrea Bharatt, must feel. Indeed, the people of Trinidad and Tobago share it with them. But this letter has to be written at the risk of losing the few friends I have left, because there are others who feel the same way but are afraid to speak out. And I have a civic, ethical, moral and dare I say a human duty to do so.

We have the deaths of two men, whose fates have to be examined. In real life, vigilante justice is an incredibly slippery slope that we as a society should avoid at all cost. 

Generally, we think of the police as controllers of crime; however, the original English conception of the role of the police force emphasised the need for police to obtain the goodwill of citizens in performing their policing duties.


Photo: Commissioner of Police Gary Griffith (right) joins officers on an exercise.

The very first set of instructions to constables, published in England in 1829, reminded the new police officer:

‘There is no qualification more indispensable to a police officer than a perfect command of temper, never suffering himself to be moved in the slightest degree, by any language or threats that may be used; if he does his duty in a quiet and determined manner, such conduct will probably induce well-disposed by-standers to assist him should he require it.’ (quoted in Skolnick and Fyfe 1993: 70)

Violence should not be an accepted norm, because many policemen believe they are entitled to punish wrongdoers. There are three dominant characteristics of police culture:

1. CynicismPolice view all citizens with suspicion, and all citizens are seen as a ‘problem’, especially if they can be categorised into a ‘type’. Those who can be categorised are to be dealt with as though they have already committed a crime, because they probably have. The very nature of police work leads police to the conclusion that all people are weak, corrupt, and/or dangerous.

2ForceThis is to be used in all situations where a threat is perceived. They can include perceived threats against the officer’s authority rather than physical ones, so that anyone with ‘an attitude’ is thought to deserve a lesson in humility. Force, then, is both expressive and instrumental. It is a symbol of the officer’s authority and dominance and is seen as the most effective method of control, because it keeps all people in line.

Photo: Police officers arrest a UWI student during a protest at the university.

3. The Police Are VictimsThe idea that the police are themselves victims of public misunderstanding and scorn, recipients of low wages, and victims of vindictive administrators sets police officers apart from other people and legitimises and rationalises a different set of rules for them. Police perception is that the public does not mind when the civil rights of ‘criminal types’ are violated; they are only upset when police misconduct targets ‘good people’.

The crux of the problem is whether means that are illegal and ethically questionable may be used to achieve ends that may themselves be considered moral. 

Police officers who use dirty means should be punished, because they will grasp their error in judgment if this happens. If we fail to condemn the use of dirty means, we become complicit in their corruption of ‘noble cause’. 

Conversely, if the public insists on punishing police officers who use dirty means, the ironic effect could be to increase our fear of crime since, we feel, criminals may go unpunished.

This paraphrase of Nietzsche is now very apt: ‘Whoever chases monsters cockroaches should see to it that, in the process, he does not become a monster cockroach himself.’ 

Photo: Commissioner of Police Gary Griffith poses over a dying suspect, arrested for the murder of a policeman, on 28 December 2019. 
The image is blurred as it may be disturbing to some readers.
More from Wired868
Judge: ‘Commissioner cannot be thin-skinned’; how Newsauce double-checked Griffith, with memorable critique

On 3 February 2021, as Trinidad and Tobago was gripped by a search for 23-year-old clerk Andrea Bharatt, blogger Rhoda Read more

Noble: The Men Behind the Curtains—beware the manipulators among us

“[…] The police, they’re going after the young kids on the streets…the big fish don’t come to do deals directly. Read more

Demming: What criteria were used to measure Erla’s performance?

When Erla Harewood-Christopher assumed the role of acting commissioner of police in December 2022 following the vacation of her predecessor, Read more

Daly Bread: Practiced detachment from the killings

Last week’s column was forced to return to what I assert is the government’s unwillingness to take any responsibility for Read more

Noble: Unending pain and suffering—save grieving communities from Hinds’ arrogance

“The area is dominated by gangs. Thus far, the police have had only limited success in eradicating the gangs. “It Read more

Noble: Is Griffith positioning himself as T&T’s J Edgar Hoover? Or Donald Trump?

“A lawless, indisciplined and corrupt nation cannot fight crime.” Pastor Clive Dottin, The People’s Roundtable, January 2024. At The People’s Read more

Check Also

Orson: How to break chains of mental slavery—including pressure of social media

“[…] The term ‘mental slavery’ suggests that even after physical chains have been broken, the …

4 comments

  1. Andrew Morris and Joel Belcon were apparently such scum of society that no one cares enough to remember their names or the fact they died under very suspicious circumstances while in police custody. Until it becomes a problem for your brother, son, nephew, uncle, father, right? Why do we need judges or courts if police are accepted as judge, jury and executioner? What part of that is in the motto: protect and serve? Slippery slopes… My condolences to the families of Andrea, Andrew and Joel.

  2. thehandbehindthecurtain

    Stop calling Gary in this crap. Our Commissioner fighting hard for us, you cannot go after swamp monsters and come out the swamp with clean pants. These criminals thought SORT is short pants police, you don’t mess with special forces or you get hurt, badly.

  3. Allyuh publishin anyting now!

  4. This is an all round sad situation. While I am no criminologist, psychologist, or law enforcement expert the outcomes here are quite troubling and must have some effect (negative or positive) on the psyche of the population. The outcry and condemnation from the population on the killing of the young woman is justified and very necessary. Likewise questions relating to police tactics and the overall treatment of suspects (persons not charged) must be called into question. Something has to be done very quickly about the level of violence that is gripping this nation. If left to fester there are going to be some very dark days ahead for our country.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.