Dear editor: Kudos to Chang Kit for taking a stance—no matter the timing of it

Mr James Chang Kit resigned his post on 4 January, in reaction to what’s happening at the Office of Procurement Regulation. I think it is immaterial that he did so three weeks before his term expired.  

When should he have done it? The bill was proclaimed on 27 December 2020.

As if to make light of his resignation, many asked ‘why he resigning right before he departs anyway’? And ‘how does corruption impact economic growth’? (A very simple and  obvious relationship, I thought!)  

Photo: Former deputy chairman of the Office of Procurement Regulation James Chang Kit.

So the focus shifted to whether his resignation means anything so close to the end of his contract and if his points connecting corruption and poor economic growth were garbage. I disagree on both points.

Regression analysis indicates that the amount of corruption is negatively linked to the level of investment and economic growth—meaning the more corruption, the less investment and economic growth!

I suggest a read of Kay’s ‘Culture and Prosperity’. Check it out! 

A quick look through the internet unearthed some excellent articles and reports from studies. Some key takeaways from Investopedia are:

  • Countries that have a high level of corruption are unable to function efficiently or prosper at an economic level, causing suffering for society as a whole.
  • Emerging market economies tend to have much higher corruption levels compared to developed countries.
  • Corruption can lead to an uneven distribution of wealth, as small businesses face unfair competition from established corporate and family players that have established illegal connections with government officials.
Image: A satirical take on corruption.
  • In a corrupt economy, resources are inefficiently allocated and companies that otherwise would not be qualified to win government contracts are often awarded projects as a result of bribery or kickbacks.
  • The quality of education, healthcare and infrastructure also deteriorates under a corrupt economy, leading to an overall lower standard of living for the country’s citizens.

This is pretty straightforward stuff.  Mr Chang Kit took a stance: simple!  

Happy New Year!

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Is Cepep programme in crisis? Or is this an opportunity for reform?

“[…] Cepep was designed as a springboard—a transitional system for those facing barriers to employment, a way to build dignity Read more

Dear Editor: Why is accountability only demanded of ‘the other side’?

“[…] What kind of society are we building when the working class is always the first to feel the axe? Read more

MSJ: T&T Labour movement can breathe after Rowley’s relentless attacks

“[…] The 10 years under the Dr Keith Rowley-led PNM saw a vicious attack on the trade union movement and Read more

Dear Editor: Gov’t should encourage local carnival entrepreneurship over cheap imports

“[…] Most carnival costumes (beads, bikinis, feathers, clothes, uniforms, caps, wire bending, etc) are now manufactured in China at reasonable costs—transport Read more

Dear Editor: Gov’t must clamp down on police refusal to use bodycams, especially in current climate

“[…] When police officers disobey direct orders from superiors to wear body cameras, it is a serious breach of protocol Read more

Dear Editor: Time for Commonweath Caribbean to prioritise AI governance

“[…] Trinidad and Tobago now joins the United Arab Emirates and Canada as the only countries in the world with Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: Is Cepep programme in crisis? Or is this an opportunity for reform?

“[…] Cepep was designed as a springboard—a transitional system for those facing barriers to employment, …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.