Dear editor: Kudos to Chang Kit for taking a stance—no matter the timing of it

Mr James Chang Kit resigned his post on 4 January, in reaction to what’s happening at the Office of Procurement Regulation. I think it is immaterial that he did so three weeks before his term expired.  

When should he have done it? The bill was proclaimed on 27 December 2020.

As if to make light of his resignation, many asked ‘why he resigning right before he departs anyway’? And ‘how does corruption impact economic growth’? (A very simple and  obvious relationship, I thought!)  

Photo: Former deputy chairman of the Office of Procurement Regulation James Chang Kit.

So the focus shifted to whether his resignation means anything so close to the end of his contract and if his points connecting corruption and poor economic growth were garbage. I disagree on both points.

Regression analysis indicates that the amount of corruption is negatively linked to the level of investment and economic growth—meaning the more corruption, the less investment and economic growth!

I suggest a read of Kay’s ‘Culture and Prosperity’. Check it out! 

A quick look through the internet unearthed some excellent articles and reports from studies. Some key takeaways from Investopedia are:

  • Countries that have a high level of corruption are unable to function efficiently or prosper at an economic level, causing suffering for society as a whole.
  • Emerging market economies tend to have much higher corruption levels compared to developed countries.
  • Corruption can lead to an uneven distribution of wealth, as small businesses face unfair competition from established corporate and family players that have established illegal connections with government officials.
Image: A satirical take on corruption.
  • In a corrupt economy, resources are inefficiently allocated and companies that otherwise would not be qualified to win government contracts are often awarded projects as a result of bribery or kickbacks.
  • The quality of education, healthcare and infrastructure also deteriorates under a corrupt economy, leading to an overall lower standard of living for the country’s citizens.

This is pretty straightforward stuff.  Mr Chang Kit took a stance: simple!  

Happy New Year!

More from Wired868
Dear Editor: Here’s the problem with Devant Maharaj’s support for US sanctions on Cuba

“[…] Mr Devant Maharaj argues that critics of that vote treat a dictatorship as a victim. That is not the Read more

Devant Maharaj: Dictators are not victims—why I support Gov’t stance on Cuba embargo

“[…] Trinidad and Tobago’s vote on 28 October 2026 against the UN resolution on the Cuba embargo was not a Read more

St Louis: How do we support Cubans through invoking decades of hardships on their citizens?

I support democracy, human rights, political freedom and the right of the Cuban people to determine their own future. Those Read more

Jessica: Shame on who, Mr Shah? Start your finger-pointing at the Top of the Hill

“[…] Mr Raffique Shah admired Paris students protesting fuel prices and the poor conditions of schools in their poorer districts… Read more

He played his role with authenticity, courage, dignity and conviction—tribute to Brother Valentino, The People’s Calypsonian

Once again, the calypso fraternity and the nation of Trinidad and Tobago have been plunged into mourning with the passing Read more

Dear Editor: Demonising Independent senators is a dangerous attack on T&T’s democracy

I am not a politician. I’m certainly not a senator. I am just a citizen who pays attention. So, when Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: Here’s the problem with Devant Maharaj’s support for US sanctions on Cuba

“[…] Mr Devant Maharaj argues that critics of that vote treat a dictatorship as a …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.