Dear Editor: T&T’s bureaucratic education system doesn’t reward success or punish failure

“[…] Public Education is the only industry we have in which if you do a good job, nothing good happens; and if you do a bad job nothing bad happens to you. If we do not change this fact, we will not get better schools…”

The following letter to the editor on the Trinidad and Tobago Education system was submitted by Dr Cliff Bertrand, educator, former NYC Board of Education public school administrator and national athlete:

From an organisational development perspective, any conversation on a road map for Education in Trinidad and Tobago has to be predicated on fundamental reforms that will involve incremental change, and, in some cases, frame-breaking change.

Public Education is the only industry we have in which if you do a good job, nothing good happens; and if you do a bad job nothing bad happens to you. If we do not change this fact, we will not get better schools.

Educational research outside Trinidad and Tobago has revealed that there is no correlation between spending on Education and how much students learn. There has to be a paradigm shift; the Education sector needs to be reinvented.

The existing model is traditional and a classic example of bureaucracy. It is centralised and rule-driven with limited input from the consumers: children, parents, teachers, the public. No one job depends on performance.

The Trinidad and Tobago system of education guarantees stability and not change.

In charting the way forward, data collection must be paramount for: policy, plans, and programs. We need to craft a vision that operates through new eyes and anticipates and embraces the future of education in T&T.

In the Book of Proverbs, Solomon said: People without a vision will perish.

In the book ‘Reinventing Government’, David Osbourne and Ted Gaebler argue that the sector must be mission-driven; customer-driven and results-driven. It is about being more efficient—to change the culture of our national bureaucracy away from complacency and entitlement, toward initiative and empowerment.

The sector must be anticipatory and identifying prevention rather than cure. There must be set goals and objectives that are measurable with resultant strategies. An implementation plan must entail: timeliness, cost, responsibilities, activities, and critical success factors.

The aim is transform the sedate Ministry of Education into one that is innovative, creative, flexible, responsive and respectable. So it becomes an institution that is embracing, diverse, and classroom inclusive—facilitating students holistically, irrespective of their abilities or skills.

We need a system that decentralises authority and decision; one that rewards success, reevaluates failure and maximises productivity, efficiency and effectiveness.

A system that is digitised, driven by technology in all disciplines, and takes into account innovations in teaching methods that could impact curriculum.

The intent of this column is to argue for change to begin a long overdue national discussion on how to repair the deep division in the education and political landscape.

The national education conversation we should be having is on: the full details of our school reopening plans after the pandemic; guidelines for Covid-19 behaviour; education, human behaviour and parenting; controlled distribution of laptops with the ministry as property owner; homework when absolutely necessary; what matters and what does not matter in the education system; what comes between pre-school and UWI.

The semantic legacy of the Ministry of Education:

• CAC > Common Entrance
• Common Entrance > 11+
• 11+ > SEA
• Cambridge > GCE
• GCE > CXC
• CXC > CSEC
• HC > Advance
• Advance > CAPE

Our discussions should transcend political and economic considerations in order to address how children are being educated, along with adequate pay for teachers, and commitment to equity and integration with TUTTA, which has over 11,000 members.

We must hold students and teacher accountable by raising the bar, employing tough and uniform standards for what is taught, measuring the results with frequent testing, and using rewards and sanctions for schools based on those scores.

Also, why charge the innocent for the mistakes of the incompetent? Pay for a review of test scores!

More from Wired868

Dear Editor: Aren’t we fed up of political games? Don’t we want better than this?

“[…] Surely, we are supposed to be fed up and tired of the mess perpetrated on us by politicians who Read more

Noble: Why the Dragon isn’t dead yet—plus T&T’s education crisis

I do not believe that the Dragon Field initiative is dead. The rumours of its end are greatly exaggerated. For Read more

Demming: Sandals offer must be fair to all—why I split with TDC over MOU

“[…] The now-infamous Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), exposed thanks to Afra Raymond’s successful legal challenge, showed a lopsided agreement. The Read more

Dear Editor: Appeal Court ruling on buggery drives home importance of constitutional reform

“[…] The [Appeal] Court ruled that, despite modern thinking and growing public support for human rights, parts of our Constitution Read more

Dr Farrell: Judicial independence vs accountability—why everyone loses in Ayers-Caesar v JLSC

“[…] Both the Privy Council and the Court of Appeal noted that the motivations of the JLSC [in the Marcia Read more

Dear Editor: Digitalisation of Carnival could lead to national transformation

“[...] Here in Trinidad and Tobago, the Road March results still rely on a manual system—TUCO officials physically count song Read more

Letters to the Editor

Want to share your thoughts with Wired868? Email us at editor@wired868.com.
Please keep your letter between 300 to 600 words and be sure to read it over first for typos and punctuation.
We don’t publish anonymously unless there is a good reason, such as an obvious threat of harassment or job loss.