Wired868 Wired868 for smart sport news and opinion
“This does not mean that hanging cannot take place; it merely means that the entire judicial process needs to take place and be completed within five years. So, it is rather disingenuous of Mr Ragoo to blame the ‘foreign architects’ (Privy Council judges) for the incompetence demonstrated by successive governments. It is incumbent upon the government to put into place a working system to speed up and streamline the judicial process. Therefore, the Attorney General is correct: the only mechanism the State could be involved in is to make sure the pace of the appellate process is quickened.
“The remaining questions in the article are meaningless as they are mere rhetoric without substance.”
The following Letter to the Editor, which is a response to a Trinidad Express letter critical of the ‘outrageous Pratt and Morgan decree,’ was submitted to Wired868 by Mohan Ramcharan of Birmingham, England.
In response to a letter by Lloyd Ragoo published in yesterday’s Trinidad Express (Tuesday 20 February), I will attempt to answer some of the questions he raised.
“What are the rudiments of a Pratt and Morgan ruling?” he asked. And “What is the logic behind this no hanging after five years ruling?”
Well, Lloyd, in its wisdom and following the law, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (PC) ruled that keeping a man on Death Row with a death sentence hanging over his head—and repeatedly reading out that final notice to him—amounted to cruel and unusual punishment (CUP). Since the Constitution forbids CUP, which is also forbidden under the most fundamental human rights and embedded in treaties to which Trinidad and Tobago has signed up, that means that it is now the law of the land that no hanging can take place after five years on Death Row.
This does not mean that hanging cannot take place; it merely means that the entire judicial process needs to take place and be completed within five years. So, it is rather disingenuous of Mr Ragoo to blame the “foreign architects” (Privy Council judges) for the incompetence demonstrated by successive governments. It is incumbent upon the government to put into place a working system to speed up and streamline the judicial process. Therefore, the Attorney General is correct: the only mechanism the State could be involved in is to make sure the pace of the appellate process is quickened.
The remaining questions in the article are meaningless as they are mere rhetoric without substance. What would be more meaningful to ask is when the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) will raise the level of performance to international standards, when the detection rate for murders will rise above 6% and when the police will gather sufficient irrefutable evidence and process it to permit convictions above 1% (of the detection rate, mind you!).
(Copyright News.gov.tt)
What would be more meaningful to ask is when will legislation be passed to speed up the judicial process so that final appeal has a chance of being completed before the five-year limit.
What would serve Mr Ragoo well would be to read the Pratt and Morgan judgement, analyse what the learned judges said, look for the reasons behind what their lordships have said and learn to separate the chaff (rhetoric and emotive diatribes) from the wheat (substance).
I suspect that this will never happen; Far too often, we find it easier to jump on the bandwagon and recycle meaningless rubbish.
Last week’s column was forced to return to what I assert is the government’s unwillingness to take any responsibility for Read more
“The area is dominated by gangs. Thus far, the police have had only limited success in eradicating the gangs. “It Read more
“A lawless, indisciplined and corrupt nation cannot fight crime.” Pastor Clive Dottin, The People’s Roundtable, January 2024. At The People’s Read more
“The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting.” Milan Kundera, a Czech and French novelist, Read more
“[…] Dr Paul Richards is not only an independent senator, but also a very experienced journalist. He ought to know Read more
A reader, who enjoys the historical perspective contained in many of these columns, asked me recently whether there is a Read more
