Wired868 Wired868 for smart sport news and opinion
“This does not mean that hanging cannot take place; it merely means that the entire judicial process needs to take place and be completed within five years. So, it is rather disingenuous of Mr Ragoo to blame the ‘foreign architects’ (Privy Council judges) for the incompetence demonstrated by successive governments. It is incumbent upon the government to put into place a working system to speed up and streamline the judicial process. Therefore, the Attorney General is correct: the only mechanism the State could be involved in is to make sure the pace of the appellate process is quickened.
“The remaining questions in the article are meaningless as they are mere rhetoric without substance.”
The following Letter to the Editor, which is a response to a Trinidad Express letter critical of the ‘outrageous Pratt and Morgan decree,’ was submitted to Wired868 by Mohan Ramcharan of Birmingham, England.
In response to a letter by Lloyd Ragoo published in yesterday’s Trinidad Express (Tuesday 20 February), I will attempt to answer some of the questions he raised.
“What are the rudiments of a Pratt and Morgan ruling?” he asked. And “What is the logic behind this no hanging after five years ruling?”
Well, Lloyd, in its wisdom and following the law, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (PC) ruled that keeping a man on Death Row with a death sentence hanging over his head—and repeatedly reading out that final notice to him—amounted to cruel and unusual punishment (CUP). Since the Constitution forbids CUP, which is also forbidden under the most fundamental human rights and embedded in treaties to which Trinidad and Tobago has signed up, that means that it is now the law of the land that no hanging can take place after five years on Death Row.
This does not mean that hanging cannot take place; it merely means that the entire judicial process needs to take place and be completed within five years. So, it is rather disingenuous of Mr Ragoo to blame the “foreign architects” (Privy Council judges) for the incompetence demonstrated by successive governments. It is incumbent upon the government to put into place a working system to speed up and streamline the judicial process. Therefore, the Attorney General is correct: the only mechanism the State could be involved in is to make sure the pace of the appellate process is quickened.
The remaining questions in the article are meaningless as they are mere rhetoric without substance. What would be more meaningful to ask is when the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) will raise the level of performance to international standards, when the detection rate for murders will rise above 6% and when the police will gather sufficient irrefutable evidence and process it to permit convictions above 1% (of the detection rate, mind you!).
(Copyright News.gov.tt)
What would be more meaningful to ask is when will legislation be passed to speed up the judicial process so that final appeal has a chance of being completed before the five-year limit.
What would serve Mr Ragoo well would be to read the Pratt and Morgan judgement, analyse what the learned judges said, look for the reasons behind what their lordships have said and learn to separate the chaff (rhetoric and emotive diatribes) from the wheat (substance).
I suspect that this will never happen; Far too often, we find it easier to jump on the bandwagon and recycle meaningless rubbish.
“[…] Both the Privy Council and the Court of Appeal noted that the motivations of the JLSC [in the Marcia Read more
It is folly for us to be absorbed with the issue of the sniper rifles and not address the more Read more
Tonight marks the start of the National Large Conventional Band preliminaries. I have described the magnificence of this evening in Read more
“[…] Arresting and imprisoning individuals removes them from society, preventing them from committing more crimes while incarcerated. But there are Read more
“[…] The accusations of political or cultural bias against our judges are simply not warranted on the facts which I Read more
On 3 February 2021, as Trinidad and Tobago was gripped by a search for 23-year-old clerk Andrea Bharatt, blogger Rhoda Read more
Mohan Ramcharan is a Trinidadian living in England, an LLB (Hons) law graduate, systems thinking practitioner, and critical thinker. He is a product of two cultures and strives to be ethical and impartial in his thoughts and actions.
