Dear Editor: Should we reintroduce late president Hassanali’s no-alcohol policy at state functions?

“[…] The sight of public officials indulging in alcohol sends mixed messages, particularly to younger generations, who are often told to avoid drinking.

“The transformation of Trinidad and Tobago will only occur when we start making conscious decisions that reflect the values we want to promote…”

The following Letter to the Editor on the potential benefit to the country of banning alcohol at state events was submitted to Wired868 by Dennise Demming, wellness therapist, communications coach and speaker:

Rum til we die?

As we grapple with increasing violence and crime, I wonder about the use of alcohol. This thought brought to my mind the late Noor Mohamed Hassanali, who served as the second President of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago from 1987 to 1997.

Known for his conservative approach, President Hassanali made a conscious decision to prohibit the consumption of alcohol at the President’s House during his tenure—a policy that no one ever complained about.

President Hassanali’s legacy as a devout Muslim and a leader committed to moral and fiscal responsibility is evident in this stance. During his presidency, state functions at the President’s House were alcohol-free.

Former Trinidad and Tobago president Noor Hassanali.
(Copyright Office of the President)

Instead of offering alcoholic beverages, guests were served a refreshing fruit drink made from five-finger, a fruit grown on the grounds of the President’s House. While some guests may have quietly grumbled, they ultimately accepted and even enjoyed the alternative.

This decision not only reflected President Hassanali’s personal and religious values but also underscored his commitment to leading by example.

By eliminating alcohol from official functions, he saved the country significant sums of money—funds that could have been redirected to more pressing needs.

In a time when the country is facing economic and social challenges, perhaps this approach deserves reconsideration.

(From second to left to right) Ministers Symon de Nobriga, Faris Al Rawi, Dr Keith Rowley and Colm Imbert open the Diego Martin Administrative Complex on 10 June 2023.
Photo: Office of the Prime Minister

The sight of public officials indulging in alcohol sends mixed messages, particularly to younger generations, who are often told to avoid drinking. It raises the question: why should we tell children not to drink alcohol, only to show them adults, especially leaders, celebrating with it?

This disconnect between the messages we give to our children and the actions of our leaders is concerning.

In the current climate, where economic belts are tightening and social issues are on the rise, rethinking the role of alcohol in state functions could be a small but meaningful change.

Photo: A bartender on the job.
(Copyright Getty Images)

Imagine if the money saved from not purchasing alcohol for government events was redirected to help those in need. It would be a symbolic yet powerful statement of prioritizing the well-being of the nation over maintaining certain luxuries.

The transformation of Trinidad and Tobago will only occur when we start making conscious decisions that reflect the values we want to promote.

Removing alcohol from government activities may seem like a small issue, but it could have a significant impact. It represents an opportunity to lead by example, promote fiscal responsibility, and send a clear message that public officials are committed to making a positive difference in society.

Two spectators take a selfie during Trinidad and Tobago’s 2016 Independence Day Parade celebrations.
Photo: Chevaughn Christopher/ Wired868

If we truly want change, it starts with the small things—like choosing a non-alcoholic toast to celebrate our nation’s milestones.

More from Wired868
Demming: Sandals offer must be fair to all—why I split with TDC over MOU

“[…] The now-infamous Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), exposed thanks to Afra Raymond’s successful legal challenge, showed a lopsided agreement. The Read more

Dear Editor: Appeal Court ruling on buggery drives home importance of constitutional reform

“[…] The [Appeal] Court ruled that, despite modern thinking and growing public support for human rights, parts of our Constitution Read more

Dr Farrell: Judicial independence vs accountability—why everyone loses in Ayers-Caesar v JLSC

“[…] Both the Privy Council and the Court of Appeal noted that the motivations of the JLSC [in the Marcia Read more

Dear Editor: Digitalisation of Carnival could lead to national transformation

“[...] Here in Trinidad and Tobago, the Road March results still rely on a manual system—TUCO officials physically count song Read more

Dear Editor: A sitting MP is evading a debt collection agency; suppose he gets elected?

“[…] In the news just recently, we had a case of a sitting MP evading a collection agency over a Read more

Dear Editor: Calypso is not dying—it’s demonstrating its adaptability

“[…] The calypso artform, like other artforms, has [...] always been constantly evolving. Although I am an elderly person, I Read more

Check Also

Dear Editor: T&T’s housing crisis—“what good is a degree if you’re paying 60% of your salary in rent?”

“[…] I stand here not just for myself, but for every young professional drowning in …

One comment

  1. Excellent points, Ms. Demming!

    There is absolutely no value added in serving alcohol at state functions. Abstinence will naturally send a positive message to the population at large. Lead by example!

    I dare say that our society is what it is today due to either the inactions or actions on the part of our leaders over the past years.

    Nuff said!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.